Hi Yaroslav,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:24:42AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > Neurodebian already offers a bootable image, and a default virtual
> > machine -- so you already *have* some idea of a default installation.
>
> we had some live cd attempt in the past but didn't push it forward.
Hi Michael and Yaroslav, and all
Just making the mails a bit shorter... :-)
On 06.04.2016 15:49, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Yes, you got it right. Debian science is the reference. Anybody who cares
> should rightfully feel responsible.
> [...]
> No we don't generate the tasks from tags, the tags a ge
Hey,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 06.04.2016 14:36, Michael Hanke wrote:
> >> Some Fields in neurodebian seem not to have 1:1 tasks in
> >> debian-science: [...]
> > Any discrepancy should be in favor of the non-neurodebian tasks,
> > everything else
Hi Michael,
On 06.04.2016 14:36, Michael Hanke wrote:
>> Some Fields in neurodebian seem not to have 1:1 tasks in
>> debian-science: [...]
> Any discrepancy should be in favor of the non-neurodebian tasks,
> everything else is an ommision/bug in our side.
>> The debian-science task "science-neu
quick clarification for now, hopefully would find time for more later)
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > Are you aiming to provide that level of granularity within debian
> > installer? if so -- that would be cool.
> Sure, I am also unstatisfied with the current state. There is curr
Hi,
advance sorry for a terse reply ... resource issues...
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Dear Yaroslav, and all,
>
> I am currently looking on how we get the Debian Blends into the
> installer for the next release. This is connected to Bug #758116 [1]
>
> One of the po
Yaroslav Halchenko writes:
> Would any user ever want that particular selection of Recommended
> packages? may be, but I see that most often users would want a
> particular selection from those pointed by Suggests and Recommends.
I think that both is useful. Sure, there are many users who wan
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Dear Yaroslav, and all,
> I am currently looking on how we get the Debian Blends into the
> installer for the next release. This is connected to Bug #758116 [1]
> One of the points there is the inclusion of NeuroDebian, which does not
> follow the usual
Dear Yaroslav, and all,
I am currently looking on how we get the Debian Blends into the
installer for the next release. This is connected to Bug #758116 [1]
One of the points there is the inclusion of NeuroDebian, which does not
follow the usual Pure Blends scheme. Since you gave a "+100" in the
9 matches
Mail list logo
