On 12/06/2017 11:49, Drew Parsons wrote:
I wonder whether this should be listed in Debian Science policy as a
general policy?: new major updates (especially transitions with a
soname change) should always be pushed first to experimental.
Otherwise you risk the danger where one component of the l
On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 10:31 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 12/06/17 10:11, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ghislain, that'd be great if you can take on scotch.
>
> Please keep in mind that I cannot commit to a super speedy ETA with
> the
> holidays coming :-)
No great rush, it'll be a c
On 12/06/17 10:11, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 09:38 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
On 12/06/17 09:03, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 15:55 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
Hi Graham, once stretch is clear I want to push the new version
of
MUMPS to unstable. Just letting y
- Original Message -
> From: "Drew Parsons"
> To: "Ghislain Vaillant" , "Debian Science List"
>
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 11:11:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Scotch upgrade [Was: Re: MUMPS and other imminent upgrades]
>
> On Mon, 2017-06-12
On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 09:38 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 12/06/17 09:03, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 15:55 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Hi Graham, once stretch is clear I want to push the new version
> > > of
> > > MUMPS to unstable. Just letting you know and Debian S
On 12/06/17 09:03, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 15:55 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
Hi Graham, once stretch is clear I want to push the new version of
MUMPS to unstable. Just letting you know and Debian Science know in
case we need to worry about trilinos during the transition.
In t
6 matches
Mail list logo
