Re: [NMU / Sponsor upload] clfft non reproducible build (Closes: 1003375)

2023-09-28 Thread Jonathan Bergh
s which "owned" by Debian Science Maintainers teams > > which I believe have been de facto abandoned by the original maintainer(s) > > (?) > > but not formally put up for adoption (excuse any inaccuracies in > > terminology or > > fact) > > > >

Re: [NMU / Sponsor upload] clfft non reproducible build (Closes: 1003375)

2023-09-28 Thread tony mancill
en de facto abandoned by the original maintainer(s) (?) > but not formally put up for adoption (excuse any inaccuracies in terminology > or > fact) > > The packages i have worked on are: > * clfft (https://mentors.debian.net/package/clfft/) (fixed reproducibility > bug (Closes

Re: [NMU / Sponsor upload] clfft non reproducible build (Closes: 1003375)

2023-09-24 Thread Jonathan Bergh
> > of packages which "owned" by Debian Science Maintainers teams > > which I believe have been de facto abandoned by the original maintainer(s) > > (?) > > but not formally put up for adoption (excuse any inaccuracies in > > terminology or >

Re: [NMU / Sponsor upload] clfft non reproducible build (Closes: 1003375)

2023-09-24 Thread tony mancill
I believe have been de facto abandoned by the original maintainer(s) (?) > but not formally put up for adoption (excuse any inaccuracies in terminology > or > fact) > > The packages i have worked on are: > * clfft (https://mentors.debian.net/package/clfft/) (fixed reproducibility

[NMU / Sponsor upload] clfft non reproducible build (Closes: 1003375)

2023-09-23 Thread Jonathan Bergh
excuse any inaccuracies in terminology or fact) The packages i have worked on are: * clfft (https://mentors.debian.net/package/clfft/) (fixed reproducibility bug (Closes: #1003375)) * clblas (https://mentors.debian.net/package/clblas/) (fixed various bugs ...) (Closes: #877316, #921611, #9

Re: state of clblas/clfft/clsparse

2019-04-02 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I haven't found anything officially saying they're abandoned upstream, but none of them have any commits since August 2017, despite open pull requests. clblas and clfft currently appear to be mostly OK in Debian (and most of the bugs that are known have patches; clsparse was remov

Re: clFFT

2015-05-04 Thread Jerome Kieffer
On Sun, 3 May 2015 21:39:39 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Jerome, > > On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 11:27:25AM +0200, Jerome Kieffer wrote: > > I have been working on the packaging of an OpenCL library to perform > > Fast Fourier Transform: clFFT. AMD is behind it but it is

Re: clFFT

2015-05-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jerome, On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 11:27:25AM +0200, Jerome Kieffer wrote: > I have been working on the packaging of an OpenCL library to perform > Fast Fourier Transform: clFFT. AMD is behind it but it is Apache-2 > license which makes a huge difference from the Debian point of vi

Re: clFFT

2015-05-03 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
That would be an awesome addition to the core Debian science packages. Thanks ! Le 3 mai 2015 10:27 AM, "Jerome Kieffer" a écrit : > Hi all, > > I have been working on the packaging of an OpenCL library to perform > Fast Fourier Transform: clFFT. AMD is behind it but it

clFFT

2015-05-03 Thread Jerome Kieffer
Hi all, I have been working on the packaging of an OpenCL library to perform Fast Fourier Transform: clFFT. AMD is behind it but it is Apache-2 license which makes a huge difference from the Debian point of view, the competitors on GPU is cuFFT which proprietary, while free to use & redistri