Re: debian: blands: mathematics-dev: libmpfi libtestu01: git-format-patch

2015-05-22 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi: On 21/05/15 21:19, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Meanwhile, I have noticed an oddity concerning libnauty-dev : the related information at http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics-dev#libnauty-dev are clearly obsolete.

Re: debian: blands: mathematics-dev: libmpfi libtestu01: git-format-patch

2015-05-22 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, On 22/05/15 14:35, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:19:15AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: The essence of this issue is: Package maintainers should either maintain the Blends tasks files when creating new packages (and libnauty2-dev is per definition a new package

Re: debian: blands: mathematics-dev: libmpfi libtestu01: git-format-patch

2015-05-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:19:15AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: The essence of this issue is: Package maintainers should either maintain the Blends tasks files when creating new packages (and libnauty2-dev is per definition a new package since there is a new name string) or at least

Re: debian: blands: mathematics-dev: libmpfi libtestu01: git-format-patch

2015-05-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jerome, On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:51:21PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: On the other hand, libnauty2-dev Provides libnauty-dev, which may be also provided by libnauty3-dev and so forth: my guess is that it would be more appropriate that the latest concrete package that Provides a

Re: debian: blands: mathematics-dev: libmpfi libtestu01: git-format-patch

2015-05-21 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Meanwhile, I have noticed an oddity concerning libnauty-dev : the related information at http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics-dev#libnauty-dev are clearly obsolete. Well, not that clearly since it is found in