On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:42:06PM -0700 schrieb Diane Trout:
> > Is there a way we could coordinate and split up updating packages? I
> > think the widgets package has been missing the javascript libraries
> > forever.
> >
> > Also
Am Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:42:06PM -0700 schrieb Diane Trout:
> Is there a way we could coordinate and split up updating packages? I
> think the widgets package has been missing the javascript libraries
> forever.
>
> Also is there a debian science chat channel?
There is #debian-science (from my
On 2024-07-04 16:23, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2024-07-03 08:34, Diane Trout wrote:
Upstream's release files for debugpy includes a vendored copy of
pydevd. For the 1.8.2 release it looks like it includes pydevd 2.9.5.
I tried building 1.8.2 with the embedded copy of pydevd removed and
the
test
On 2024-07-03 08:34, Diane Trout wrote:
Upstream's release files for debugpy includes a vendored copy of
pydevd. For the 1.8.2 release it looks like it includes pydevd 2.9.5.
I tried building 1.8.2 with the embedded copy of pydevd removed and the
tests immediately crashed without making much pr
Le Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 11:34:36PM -0700, Diane Trout a écrit :
> I did a first peek at the jupyter packages and tried to build jupyter-
> core to see what was up with #1047824 "jupyter-core fails to build
> source after successful build".
I assume jupyter-core-5.3.1/changelog.md is regenerated bu
I did a first peek at the jupyter packages and tried to build jupyter-
core to see what was up with #1047824 "jupyter-core fails to build
source after successful build".
However then I discovered that it depends on a version of
pydevd < 2.11 and debian now has 3.1.0 in unstable, so it has an
unsa
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 9:21 AM Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear Debian science,
>
> The jupyter-notebook packages are in bad shape,
> there are 4 RC bugs and the last maintainer upload was nearly 2 years ago,
> the version in unstable does not start, there are new usptreamm version
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 03:07:56PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2024-07-01 14:55, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:40:00PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > On 2024-06-29 14:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > Dear Debian science,
> > >
Hi Bill,
On 29/06/2024 14:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
Dear Debian science,
The jupyter-notebook packages are in bad shape,
there are 4 RC bugs and the last maintainer upload was nearly 2 years ago,
the version in unstable does not start, there are new usptreamm versions etc.
Maybe we can do
On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 15:07 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> Yeah, a lot of Debian Science developers are already members of the
> Python team. If not, they can easily sign up to the DPT.
>
> > Is there any obstruction to upgrade it to the latest upstream
> > version
> > (7.2.1) ?
> > Would that
On 2024-07-01 14:55, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:40:00PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2024-06-29 14:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear Debian science,
>
> The jupyter-notebook packages are in bad shape,
> there are 4 RC bugs and the last maintainer upload was ne
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:40:00PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2024-06-29 14:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Dear Debian science,
> >
> > The jupyter-notebook packages are in bad shape,
> > there are 4 RC bugs and the last maintainer upload was nearly 2 years
On 2024-06-29 14:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
Dear Debian science,
The jupyter-notebook packages are in bad shape,
there are 4 RC bugs and the last maintainer upload was nearly 2 years
ago,
the version in unstable does not start, there are new usptreamm
versions etc.
Maybe we can do something
Dear Debian science,
The jupyter-notebook packages are in bad shape,
there are 4 RC bugs and the last maintainer upload was nearly 2 years ago,
the version in unstable does not start, there are new usptreamm versions etc.
Maybe we can do something about it.
Cheers,
--
Bill.
Imagine a large
14 matches
Mail list logo
