Re: simple batch queue system

Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: > OK, so I guess we have hijacked this thread for a discussion of Torque > packaging. Sorry about that! I hope the OP is content with the feedback so > far, and perhaps will try out torque and help debug the packages ;-) > :) > Now I see that Steffen also has submitted th

Re: simple batch queue system

OK, so I guess we have hijacked this thread for a discussion of Torque packaging. Sorry about that! I hope the OP is content with the feedback so far, and perhaps will try out torque and help debug the packages ;-) Steffen Moeller wrote: > Yes. We are both in the pkg-escience.alioth.debian.org pr

Re: simple batch queue system

Hi, On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:05:26PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > > I've been working on TORQUE packages *from scratch* for a pair of days. > > Michael Banck learned about this, and he pointed me at this thread and at > > the Ubuntu packages I did not know about. Great way of duplicating wor

Re: simple batch queue system

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:05:26PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > Yes. We are both in the pkg-escience.alioth.debian.org project, to which I > would very much > like to welcome you, too. Just to cook up an old discussion: What actually was the reason to have pkg-escience.alioth.debian.org in par

Re: simple batch queue system

Hi, Jordi Mallach wrote: > [ Please CC: me on replies, as I'm not subscribed to this list ] please subscribe - it is low traffic. > I've been working on TORQUE packages *from scratch* for a pair of days. > Michael Banck learned about this, and he pointed me at this thread and at > the Ubuntu pac

Re: simple batch queue system

[ Please CC: me on replies, as I'm not subscribed to this list ] Hi! I've been working on TORQUE packages *from scratch* for a pair of days. Michael Banck learned about this, and he pointed me at this thread and at the Ubuntu packages I did not know about. Great way of duplicating work! Anyway,

Re: simple batch queue system?

On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 11:12:16AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I have missed the reason why the expiration of clauses 1 and 2 could have been > cancelled a posteriori. Because the OpenPBS copyright holder decided to go commercial and push their OpenPBS-Enhanced or whatever product. Note that

Re: simple batch queue system?

Le Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 04:08:48PM +0200, Steffen Moeller a écrit : > > Upon your initial comment, I had updated torque from free to non-free and > asked for a > removal of the free version from the upstream queue. Since the second upload > did not also > upload the source, that second upload ha

Re: simple batch queue system?

Steffen Moeller wrote: > Michael Banck wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:35:44AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: >>> I am now uploading a new version ... [...] > > Upon your initial comment, I had updated torque from free to non-free and > asked for a > removal of the free version from the upst

Re: simple batch queue system?

Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:35:44AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: >> I am now uploading a new version ... > > What happened? Torque seems to be no longer in the NEW queue. What happened...I asked upstream who agree to what you say, without really saying to what bits of yo

Re: simple batch queue system?

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:35:44AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > I am now uploading a new version ... What happened? Torque seems to be no longer in the NEW queue. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: simple batch queue system?

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:35:44AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > Well, upstream likes the Debian package to appear and indicated that > they would refer to it on their web site once it has hit the archive. > Concerning the license, yes, I made a mistake, it should have gone to > non-free since it

Re: simple batch queue system?

Michael Banck wrote: > On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: >> Sorry for having lost the original post already, but you might be interested >> in the upload >> of Morten's Ubuntu package (a week ago) for the PBS-descendent Torque in its >> new upstream >> version 2.3.7

Re: simple batch queue system?

On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > Sorry for having lost the original post already, but you might be interested > in the upload > of Morten's Ubuntu package (a week ago) for the PBS-descendent Torque in its > new upstream > version 2.3.7 to the new queue > http://

Re: simple batch queue system?

Sorry for having lost the original post already, but you might be interested in the upload of Morten's Ubuntu package (a week ago) for the PBS-descendent Torque in its new upstream version 2.3.7 to the new queue http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/torque_2.3.7+dfsg-1.html . I don't know if it is s

Re: simple batch queue system?

Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >Another entry from France was presented in one of the UseR! 2009 sessions: >http://www.agrocampus-ouest.fr/math/useR-2009/slides/Etienne+Corvazier+Legros.pdf >Their code is at http://code.google.com/p/coalition/ --- it uses Python and >Twisted (which we have) and two si

Re: simple batch queue system?

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 22 July 2009 at 16:32, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | On 22/07/09 at 12:30 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote: > | > I'm in the market for a simple job scheduler for a set of work nodes [...] > | OAR . Not packaged in Debian, but

Re: simple batch queue system?

On 22 July 2009 at 16:32, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | On 22/07/09 at 12:30 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote: | > Hi Debian scientists, | > | > I'm in the market for a simple job scheduler for a set of work nodes | > in the 'cloud' (i.e. EC2). A queue for submitted non-parallel jobs, | > commands to insert a

Re: simple batch queue system?

On 22/07/09 at 12:30 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote: > Hi Debian scientists, > > I'm in the market for a simple job scheduler for a set of work nodes > in the 'cloud' (i.e. EC2). A queue for submitted non-parallel jobs, > commands to insert and delete jobs, and simple first-come, first > served schedul

simple batch queue system?

Hi Debian scientists, I'm in the market for a simple job scheduler for a set of work nodes in the 'cloud' (i.e. EC2). A queue for submitted non-parallel jobs, commands to insert and delete jobs, and simple first-come, first served scheduling is what I'm looking for. Starting and stopping node inst