a.
I don't understand what the problem here should be? The mail address
should be valid.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
other reasons too such as merging multiple documents
into one or such. One can probably fine more in endless mail threads
from the time of the decision above.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
anual, like GNU software”.
> ---
>
> Can you please share where the licensing issue is? I don't think
> that's the GFDL - because this manual has no invariant sections - is
> it?
The problem are the "Front-Cover Texts" and "Back-Cover Texts".
Ansgar
--
debian-science
Source: ucx
Version: 1.10.0~rc1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Alastair McKinstry
The maintainer address is invalid, see below.
Ansgar
Start of forwarded message
From: Mail Delivery System
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
lon for comparison seems to large for
arm64. Given arch:all packages are only built on amd64, I think this
shouldn't be release critical.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
ckages, I don't think it should be release
critical.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
important as
otherwise bug reports or other mails will most likely just go
unnoticed.
Ansgar
[1]: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
eh:/<>/dune/grid-glue/test/ringcommtest.cc:24]: MPI ERROR --
>> MPI_ERR_TAG: invalid tag
The is probably caused by `int tag = 12345678;` in the code while
OpenMPI might have a lower limit, see [1].
[1]: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/6940
Ansgar
--
debian-science-main
. I
usually build with parallel=8 without problems, so I don't want to
limit it to 3.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
test-geogrid-yaspgrid
> Status:FAILED
> Output:
[...]
>Dune::GridError
> [checkIntersectionIterator:/<>/dune/grid/test/checkintersectionit.hh:518]:
> Could not find inside entity through intersection iterator on outside entity.
This is not fixed by 2.7.0
ting DUNE modules
from its old autotools buildsystem to CMake. I don't think it is worth
porting it to python3 and will likely remove it from the Debian package
with the next upload; maybe it should also be removed upstream.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-ma
f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault pti ssbd
ibrs ibpb stibp fsgsbase smep arat md_clear flush_l1d arch_capabilities
+---[ Output from `lscpu` ]
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.deb
Hi,
Kurt Kremitzki writes:
> On 5/17/19 4:14 AM, Ansgar wrote:
>> I tried and with this line removed gmsh builds again. I'll ask the
>> release team about t-p-u or reverting in unstable.
[...]
> Sorry for not addressing this sooner such that you needed to spend time
> lookin
this line removed gmsh builds again. I'll ask the
release team about t-p-u or reverting in unstable.
Thanks for looking into the problem.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/l
On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 16:05 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> [ Ansgar: If you still can reproduce the assertion failure, please
> file
> a new bug. It's better not to mix different issues in the same report ].
The other assertion failure I had also disappeared this week.
go away, but the
name of template arguments shouldn't really matter?
There is also a template argument `T` in the generic version of the
`Transfer` class... Maybe that results in the confusion in some way?
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
h
OpenMPI, you can just build the attached minimal MPI program.
Ansgar
/*
sudo apt-get install mpi-default-bin mpi-default-dev
export OMPI_MCA_plm_rsh_agent=/bin/false
export OMPI_MCA_rmaps_base_oversubscribe=1
mpicc -o mpi-test mpi-test.c && mpirun -np 2 ./mpi-test
*/
#include
int
porting the changes to the Debian package in the next
days.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
breaking multi-arch.
If I don't find time to look at the errors or still get compiler errors,
I'll probably ask for removal of the binary packages on the failing
architectures.
Ansgar
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
19 matches
Mail list logo
