Bug#842405: paraview: can't load hdf5 file: vtkSISourceProxy: Failed to create vtkXdmfReader

2024-10-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #842405 p.s. paraview does still crash when trying to read a .h5 file using an XDMF reader. But I'll keep this bug closed all the same, since the XDMF reader should be used to open .xdmf files, not .h5 files. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian

Bug#1081631: pyzoltan: FTBFS error: ‘MPI_Session’ does not name a type

2024-09-22 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: pyzoltan Followup-For: Bug #1081631 Ah, correction, zoltan is not built on the 32-bit arches, so we don't need to worry about pyzoltan and mpi4py interacting with mpich. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.deb

Bug#1081631: pyzoltan: FTBFS error: ‘MPI_Session’ does not name a type

2024-09-22 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: pyzoltan Followup-For: Bug #1081631 Control: tags -1 ftbfs Looks like one of the two solutions at https://github.com/mpi4py/mpi4py/issues/525#issuecomment-2256633404 is what's needed. We'll need to see how it goes with mpich (on the 32-bit arches). -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

Bug#1082567: deal.ii: new upstream release needed to support sundials 7

2024-09-22 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: deal.ii Version: 9.5.1-3 Severity: important sundials 7 (in experimental) introduced enough API changes that probably break deal.ii 9.5. deal.ii 9.6 has already been updated to support sundials 7, so please update to the latest upstream release. Note that sundials 7 moves MPI support int

Bug#1082562: dyssol: FTBFS build fails with sundials 7

2024-09-22 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: dyssol Version: 1.1.1+ds1-2.1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/DyssolTEC/Dyssol-open/issues/188 dyssol fails to build against sundials 7 (in experimental) We'll want to upload sundials 7 soon to unstable (transition #1082552), at which point this bu

Bug#1082552: transition: petsc and numerical library stack

2024-09-21 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@packages.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:petsc User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I'd like to update the numerical library stack, for petsc and related libraries. L

Bug#1082291: scikit-learn: tests fail with scipy 1.14

2024-09-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scikit-learn Version: 1.4.2+dfsg-6 Severity: normal scikit-learn tests fail with scipy 1.14 from experimental Perhaps it's been fixed in the latest upstream release, I don't know. https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/scikit-learn/unstable/amd64/51759247/ 648s ___ test_standard_scaler_par

Bug#1082085: libsundials-dev: sundials_config.h sets SUNDIALS_MPI_ENABLED=1 even for serial jobs

2024-09-18 Thread Drew Parsons
The issue is known upstream, and in fact is deliberate. In that sense it is not a bug, but may be an issue for reverse dependencies. The change in behaviour comes from the introduction of SUNComm in PR#370 https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/pull/370 committed at https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/c

Bug#1082085: libsundials-dev: sundials_config.h sets SUNDIALS_MPI_ENABLED=1 even for serial jobs

2024-09-18 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: libsundials-dev Version: 7.1.1+dfsg1-1exp1 Severity: normal The build for sundials 7.1.1 seems to hardcode support for MPI, placing #define SUNDIALS_MPI_ENABLED 1 in /usr/include/sundials/sundials_config.h This makes it more difficult than it should be to use components of SUNDIALS in se

Bug#1015672: sundials: ftbfs with LTO (link time optimization) enabled

2024-09-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: sundials Followup-For: Bug #1015672 This issue seems to have metastasised, such that the suggested SUSE patch is no longer sufficient. sunlinsol is now affected, not the nvector components With sundials 7.1.1, optimize=+lto gets [ 82%] Linking Fortran executable test_fsunlinsol_spbcgs_m

Bug#1081972: nmu: fenics-dolfinx_1:0.8.0-11

2024-09-16 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: fenics-dolf...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:fenics-dolfinx User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu fenics-dolfinx_1:0.8.0-11 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against mpi4py 4" nmu dolfin_2019.2.0~le

Bug#1080198: h5py: autopkgtest regressions with mpich as default provider on 32 bit architectures

2024-09-16 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: h5py Followup-For: Bug #1080198 As far as I can read the test log, the mpich (32-bit) tests are not actually failing. It looks like the error conditions is occuring afterwards during shutdown. Perhaps some test files need to be explicitly closed before shutdown. -- debian-science-maint

Bug#1081631: pyzoltan: FTBFS error: MPI_Session does not name a type

2024-09-16 Thread Drew Parsons
reassign 1081631 src:pyzoltan thanks MPI_Session is defined in mpi4py.h (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mpi4py/include/mpi4py/mpi4py.h) pyzoltan is not including it -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi

Bug#1081631: pyzoltan: FTBFS error: ‘MPI_Session’ does not name a type

2024-09-16 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-mpi4py Followup-For: Bug #1081631 mpi4py is scrupulously tested. It's more likely a bug in pyzoltan. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1081459: FTBFS: test_util_pool fails

2024-09-11 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-mpi4py Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: FTBFS Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mpi4py/mpi4py/issues/545 mpi4py 4 was building fine in experimental but shows tests error in unstable: testTestAll (test_util_pkl5.TestPKL5World.testTestAll) ... ok

Bug#1079789: statsmodels: tests fail on arm64 with scipy 1.14

2024-08-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: statsmodels Version: 0.14.2+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/issues/7866 statsmodels is failing tests on arm64 with scipy 1.14 (from experimental) 1504s __ TestZeroInflatedModel_probit.test_fit_regularized __

Bug#1079787: python-fluids: tests fail with scipy 1.14

2024-08-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: python-fluids Version: 1.0.22-2 Severity: normal python-fluids is failing tests with scipy 1.14 (from experimental) due to a change in API. The problem is fixed in the latest upstream release. The error looks like 84s __ test_integrate_drag_sphere

Bug#1079681: python-ltfatpy: tests fail with scipy 1.14

2024-08-26 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: python-ltfatpy Version: 1.0.16-10 Severity: normal python-ltfatpy is failing tests with scipy 1.14 (from experimental) 94s _ TestGabWin.test_str_entries __ 94s 94s self = 94s 94s def test_str_entries(self): 94s a = ran

Bug#1079566: petsc 3.21 fails to run build-time-tests

2024-08-24 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: petsc Version: 3.21.4+dfsg1-1exp1 Severity: normal Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/issues/1634 petsc 3.21 is failing to successfully run build-time tests (with build dir identified by PETSC_ARCH at build time). The check_build rule invokes testex19 in src/snes/tutor

Bug#1075380: petsc: ftbfs with GCC-14

2024-08-14 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: petsc Version: 3.20.6+dfsg1-1 Followup-For: Bug #1075380 petsc still fails this way with scotch 7.0.5 (which has fixed scotch's own gcc-14 problem). The issue is that petsc is configured to use default scotch (integer not specified, meaning int). But the petsc64 build gets PetscInt defin

Bug#1078123: scikit-learn: test_svm fails on i386 with scipy 1.13

2024-08-07 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scikit-learn Version: 1.4.2+dfsg-5 Severity: normal Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/29633 scipy 1.13 is triggering test failure in test_svc_ovr_tie_breaking[NuSVC] on i386 architecture. The error can be seeing in debian CI tests, https://ci.debia

Bug#1075380: petsc: ftbfs with GCC-14

2024-08-02 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: petsc Followup-For: Bug #1075380 Control: block 1075380 by 1075495 The error refers to scotch. I'm working through the scotch gcc-14 error first. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/

Bug#1077592: openmpi: rebuilding openmpi 4 for ppc64el without UCX

2024-07-30 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: openmpi Version: 4.1.6-13.3 Severity: normal libopenmpi3t64 4.1.6-13.3 Depends on libucx0 for ppc64el, but ucx 1.17.0+ds-2 dropped ppc64el as a supported arch. Does openmpi 4.1.6 need to be reconfigured to build on ppc64el without UCX, or does it only need a binNMU? -- debian-science-m

Bug#1076130: slepc's autopkg tests fail on armhf and i386, triggered by gcc-13

2024-07-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: slepc Followup-For: Bug #1076130 Control: block 1076130 by 1076579 As far as I can tell this test failure simply got caught in the mpi transition (mpich on 32-bit). Nothing seems to be blocking mpi migration to testing apart from ucx being removed from ppc64el (see Bug#1076579). I thin

Bug#1076579: RM: ucx [ppc64el] -- ROM; Temporarily drop ppc64el as a supported arch

2024-07-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: u...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ucx User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Control: affects -1 src:mpich ucx 1.17.0+ds-2 has temporarily dropped ppc64el as a supported arch to allow it to proceed. But the

Bug#1076466: dijitso: autopkgtest regressions with mpich as default provider on 32 bit architectures

2024-07-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: dijitso Followup-For: Bug #1076466 32-bit (mpich) tests are passing in unstable. I guess this bug is caught in the middle of the mpi transition. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/l

Bug#1076234: (no subject)

2024-07-13 Thread Drew Parsons
Subject: Re: lammps: FTBFS with mpich as default MPI provider on armel, armhf: Fatal error in internal_Comm_set_errhandler: Invalid communicator Followup-For: Bug #1076234 Package: lammps Control: tags -1 ftbfs This looks like a bug in libfakeroot rather than lammps. -- debian-science-maintaine

Bug#1076028: h5py: FTBFS with mpich as default MPI implementation on armel, armhf, i386: build/h5py/_debian_h5py_mpi/tests/test_file.py::TestMPI::test_mpio make[1]: *** [debian/rules:125: override_dh_

2024-07-10 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: h5py Followup-For: Bug #1076028 Control: tags -1 ftbfs Control: blocks 1076028 by 1075980 I'm not certain this is a bug in h5py. More likely the problem is mpi4py, Bug#1075980. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-l

Bug#1074629: pyswarms: fails tests with matplotlib 3.8

2024-07-02 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: pyswarms Version: 1.3.0-6 Severity: normal pyswarms is failing tests with matplotlib 3.8 from experimental: 57s ERROR collecting tests/utils/plotters/test_plotters.py 57s ImportError while importing test module '/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.ljy3li2v/downtmp/autopkgte

Bug#1073547: pytorch-geometric: tests fail with scipy 1.13

2024-06-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: pytorch-geometric Version: 2.4.0-2 Severity: important Control: affects -1 src:scipy pytorch-geometric is failing tests with scipy 1.13 from experimental, evidently due to use of a deprecated API. The error message is 187s test/distributed/test_rpc.py On WorkerInfo(id=0, name=dist-featur

Bug#1073541: gensim: tests fail with scipy 1.13

2024-06-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: gensim Version: 4.3.2+dfsg-1 Severity: important Control: affects -1 src:scipy gensim is failing to start tests using scipy 1.13 from experimental, apparently due to use of a decprecated API. Error is 278s ___ ERROR collecting gensim/test/test_aggregation.py ___

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-06-12 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-06-11 16:53, Timo Röhling wrote: Hi, I gave it a bit of thought and tightened the dependency from python3-nanobind on nanobind-dev, so both packages will be installed with the same version. I also added a pydist override so that python3-nanobind will automatically emit a versioned dep

Bug#1072939: paraview: armel needs -latomic linking

2024-06-10 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Version: 5.12.0+dfsg-4 Severity: important Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues/19352 paraview FTBFS on armel with bin/vtkWrapPython-pv5.12 -MF /<>/build.python3.12/CMakeFiles/vtkRemotingServerManagerPython/vtkSMDataSourceProxyPython.cxx.d @/<>/

Bug#1072591: silx: debci fails tests (testClickOnBackToParentTool))

2024-06-04 Thread Drew Parsons
I meant to add, the testClickOnBackToParentTool failure was on ppc64el. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1072591: silx: debci fails tests (testClickOnBackToParentTool)

2024-06-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: silx Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: debci Control: affects -1 src:scipy silx has started failing debci tests. This is blocking migration of scipy 1.12 to testing (though in principle scipy shouldn't be causing the problem, since tests passed recently against the ve

Bug#1071722: adios4dolfinx: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-05-31 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-05-31 14:04, Santiago Vila wrote: El 31/5/24 a las 13:21, Drew Parsons escribió: Source: adios4dolfinx Followup-For: Bug #1071722 Santiago, could you try running with export OMPI_MCA_rmaps_base_oversubscribe=true added to the top of debian/rules? That seems to work. And also it

Bug#1071722: adios4dolfinx: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-05-31 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios4dolfinx Followup-For: Bug #1071722 Santiago, could you try running with export OMPI_MCA_rmaps_base_oversubscribe=true added to the top of debian/rules? I think that will get it working on your test system. I think the problem is that openmpi does not use hwthreads or oversubscrib

Bug#1071722: adios4dolfinx: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-05-31 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios4dolfinx Followup-For: Bug #1071722 Control: severity 1071722 important This bug appears to arise from how openmpi needs to be invoked on a specific system. It doesn't affect all systems, and doesn't affect debian buildds or debci, so downgrading severity. -- debian-science-maintai

Bug#1071722: adios4dolfinx: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-05-26 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-05-26 12:44, Santiago Vila wrote: To track that, what does `lscpu` report on your failing system? (the thread,core,socket lines are probably the relevant ones) It's an AWS machine of type m6a.large. These are the most relevant specs. Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socke

Bug#1071722: adios4dolfinx: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-05-26 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-05-25 18:31, Santiago Vila wrote: El 25/5/24 a las 16:42, Drew Parsons escribió: adios4dolfinx is building cleanly in reproducibility builds. Perhaps the problem was a temporary glitch on your test system? No, this is unlikely to be a temporary glitch: ... My system has 2 CPUs

Bug#1061243: Bug #1061243 FTBFS: needs update for xsimd 12

2024-05-25 Thread Drew Parsons
Control: retitle 1061243 needs update for xsimd 13 Now xsimd 13 is available. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1071722: adios4dolfinx: FTBFS: failing tests

2024-05-25 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios4dolfinx Followup-For: Bug #1071722 Control: tags -1 ftbfs adios4dolfinx is building cleanly in reproducibility builds. Perhaps the problem was a temporary glitch on your test system? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https

Bug#1071700: paraview: FTBFS 32-bit arches: xdmf3 invalid conversion ‘long unsigned int*’ to ‘const int*’

2024-05-23 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Version: 5.12.0+dfsg-4 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs paraview 5.12 has started failing to build on i386. paraview 5.11 previously built on i386. The problem appears to be an implicit conversion from ‘long unsigned int*’ to ‘const int*’ in getArrayType in XdmfArray.cpp paravie

Bug#1071518: paraview: s390x test failure: vtkClientServerStream::Invoke stream_value invalid

2024-05-20 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Version: 5.11.2+dfsg-7 Severity: important Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/-/issues/22620 The Debian build of paraview (5.11.2) fails CI tests on the s390x architecture. Test logs can be found at https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/paraview/unsta

Bug#900364: paraview: Paraview viewer mishandles fractional Qt screen scaling

2024-05-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #900364 Control: tags 900364 moreinfo Fractional scaling seems to be working now, at least for eDP-1 > 1. Can you confirm if the problem is fixed in paraview 5.11.2 or later? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.d

Bug#842405: paraview: can't load hdf5 file: vtkSISourceProxy: Failed to create vtkXdmfReader

2024-05-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #842405 Control: tags 842405 moreinfo HDF5 is a general data format, it has no natural viewing format. When you load a file into paraview you need to specify which reader you want to open it with. Which reader are you expecting to use with your .h5 file? Your

Bug#820453: paraview: "Help -> ParaView Guide" gives error

2024-05-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #820453 "Help -> ParaView Guide" now (5.11.2) provides a (functioning) url link to https://docs.paraview.org/en/v5.11.2/ which opens normally in the web browser. Not so helpful if you don't have internet access, but at least it's not giving an error now. Perha

Bug#982601: python3-paraview Conflicts: python3-vtk9

2024-05-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Version: 5.11.2+dfsg-6+b9 Followup-For: Bug #982601 X-Debbugs-Cc: Petter Reinholdtsen Petter, paraview might never be aligned with vtk. See https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/-/issues/18751 If facet-analyser needs to be able to work with either (both) python3-paravie

Bug#1070894: slepc: FTBFS: Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘slepcmfn.mod’ for reading at (1): No such file or directory

2024-05-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: slepc Followup-For: Bug #1070894 Control: tags -1 ftbfs fixed-upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/slepc/slepc/-/issues/83 Fixed upstream in 3.20.2, https://gitlab.com/slepc/slepc/-/merge_requests/639 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alio

Bug#1069321: FTBFS: [Makefile:163: check] Error 1

2024-05-14 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: hypre Followup-For: Bug #1069321 It's passing in reproducibility rebuilds. Perhaps it was a transitory glitch. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1069321: FTBFS: [Makefile:163: check] Error 1

2024-05-13 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: hypre Followup-For: Bug #1069321 Control: tags -1 ftbfs hypre is passing debci and reproducibility tests on armhf. Looks like the error reported here was a transitory issue, possibly related to openmpi upgrades. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@aliot

Bug#1066449: mpi4py: FTBFS: Segmentation fault in tests

2024-05-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: mpi4py Followup-For: Bug #1066449 Control: tags -1 ftbfs The bug report stopped scanning at the first "error", which is not an error (it's a check). The last error is the relevant one testIReadIWrite (test_io.TestIOSelf.testIReadIWrite) ... ok testIReadIWriteAll (test_io.TestIOSelf.testI

Bug#1069432: mpi4py: FTBFS on armhf: ld: cannot find -llmpe: No such file or directory

2024-05-05 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: mpi4py Followup-For: Bug #1069432 There have been ongoing issues with OpenMPI on 32-bit architectures, partly related to drop of 32-bit support by pmix. This bug is likely related to that i.e. not a bug in mpi4py itself. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintain

Bug#1070338: FTBFS: libadios2_serial_evpath.so.2.10.0: undefined reference to `cmfabric_add_static_transport'

2024-05-03 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios2 Version: 2.10.0+dfsg1-1 Severity: normal Tags: ftbfs Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ornladios/ADIOS2/issues/4156 Building the debian package for adios 2.10.0 (in experimental) fails with "libadios2_serial_evpath.so.2.10.0: undefined reference to `cmfabric_add_static_tran

Bug#1062405: dolfin: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-04-20 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: dolfin Followup-For: Bug #1062405 Control: severity 1062405 testing Control: tags 1062405 moreinfo This time_t patch was never applied. Is it not needed after all? Can we close this bug now? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net h

Bug#1062587: fenics-dolfinx: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-04-12 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: fenics-dolfinx Followup-For: Bug #1062587 Control: severity 1062587 important Control: tags 1062587 moreinfo This time_t patch was never applied. I presume it's not needed after all and we can close this bug now? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alio

Bug#1068319: armci-mpi: debian-...@lists.debian.org

2024-04-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: armci-mpi Followup-For: Bug #1068319 armci-mpi is already building for mpich so the transition should be manageable. Will just need to make sure it switches off the openmpi build cleanly. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https

Bug#1068464: deal.ii: FTBFS: libgmp not linked, libdeal.ii.g.so.9.5.1: error: undefined reference to '__gmpn_neg'

2024-04-05 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: deal.ii Version: 9.5.1-2 Severity: normal Tags: ftbfs I'm getting an error running deal.ii tests building against petsc 3.20 (from experimental) [100%] Built target dealii_release make -f tests/CMakeFiles/test.dir/build.make tests/CMakeFiles/test.dir/depend make[5]: Entering directory '

Bug#1067308: python-meshplex: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" --test-args=--ignore-glob=\*test_io\* returned exit code 13

2024-04-02 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: python-meshplex Followup-For: Bug #1067308 Control: tags -1 ftbfs I can't reproduce this error now. It must have been resolved by a separate library transition, or possibly a numpy update. If 0.17.1-3 passes tests successfully then we can close this bug. -- debian-science-maintainers m

Bug#1067064: transition: petsc hypre

2024-03-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@packages.debian.org, francesco.balla...@unicatt.it Control: affects -1 + src:petsc User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition The petsc patch for the 64-bit time_t transition was deeply invasive. It makes petsc

Bug#1065323: petsc: bad Provides in libpetsc64-real3.19t64, libpetsc64-complex3.19t64 and libpetsc-real3.19t64

2024-03-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: petsc Followup-For: Bug #1065323 petsc has a complex set of symlink farms since it needs to enable multiple alternative build profiles. I'll implement the patch in a way that doesn't let t64 get in the way of updating subsequently (to 3.20 in the near future). Drew -- debian-science-ma

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2024-02-24 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-02-24 12:40, Francesco Poli wrote: On Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:18:21 +0100 Drew Parsons Can you confirm paraview 5.11 is meeting your image quality expectations? Only if I disable FXAA (which, by the way, is enabled by default, but can luckily be disabled in the settings!). ... Could

Bug#1064280: scikit-learn: armhf tests failing: not giving expected divide-by-zero warning

2024-02-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scikit-learn Version: 1.4.1.post1+dfsg-1 Severity: normal sklearn 1.4 is passing most tests but two remain "failing" on armhf. test_tfidf_no_smoothing and test_qda_regularization are "expected to fail" by emitting a divide-by-zero warning, but they emit no such exception. I guess it's a

Bug#1029701: scikit-learn: tests fail with scipy 1.10

2024-02-15 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scikit-learn Version: 1.2.1+dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #1029701 Control: severity 1029701 serious scipy 1.11 is now uploaded to unstable, so bumping this bug severity to serious. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-li

Bug#1029701: scikit-learn: tests fail with scipy 1.10

2024-02-09 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: scikit-learn Version: 1.2.1+dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #1029701 scikit-learn continues to fail with scipy 1.11 from experimental 648s FAILED ../../../../usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py::test_incompatible_solver_for_sparse_input[interior-point] 648s

Bug#1062356: adios2: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): times out on big host

2024-02-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios2 Followup-For: Bug #1062356 The flakey test is adios2-mpi-examples. debian/tests is building and running them manually, and running on only 3 processors (mpirun -n 3) So the problem can't be overload of the machine. I'll just skip insituGlobalArraysReaderNxN_mpi. For reference, ups

Bug#1062356: adios2: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): times out on big host

2024-02-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios2 Followup-For: Bug #1062356 Can't be quite as simple as just the host machine. https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/a/adios2/41403641/log.gz completed in 9 minutes, while https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/a/adios2/41496866/log.gz failed with time

Bug#1061386: libxtensor-dev: Fails to install for arm64 arch on amd64

2024-02-05 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: libxtensor-dev Followup-For: Bug #1061386 Control: fixed 1061386 0.24.7-1 I'm a bit confused why you're installing libxtensor-dev:arm64 on amd64. Wouldn't it make more sense to install libxtensor-dev:amd64? In any case this was fixed in libxtensor-dev 0.24.7 (actually in 0.24.4-1exp1), m

Bug#1061357: python3-spglib: spglib python package not identified by dh_python3

2024-01-22 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-spglib Version: 2.2.0-2 Severity: normal We have dh_python3 to help automatically identify python package dependencies when building a package. It's unable to identify spglib, however. For instance a pymatgen build log shows dh_python3 -a -O--buildsystem=pybuild I: dh_python3

Bug#1061263: python3-spglib: fails with python3.12 (extension not built)

2024-01-22 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-01-22 09:28, Andrius Merkys wrote: Hi Drew, spglib should be configured to build for all available python versions. In other libraries (e.g. fenics-basix) this is done by building the C library separately from the the python module. Thanks for a pointer, I will give fenics-basix a l

Bug#1061263: python3-spglib: fails with python3.12 (extension not built)

2024-01-21 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-spglib Version: 2.2.0-2 Severity: normal python3-spglib fails with python3.12, since the python extension is built only for python3.11. spglib should be configured to build for all available python versions. In other libraries (e.g. fenics-basix) this is done by building the C li

Bug#1061243: FTBFS: needs update for xsimd 12

2024-01-21 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: libxtensor-dev Version: 0.24.7-4 Severity: important Tags: upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xtensor/issues/2769 xtensor 0.24.7 is configured to use xsimd 10. xtensor upstream head supports xsimd 11. But xsimd 12 has been recently released and is required to

Bug#1061063: armhf: h5py's tests expose unaligned memory accesses during the build

2024-01-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: h5py Followup-For: Bug #1061063 Control: forwarded 1061063 https://github.com/h5py/h5py/issues/1927 The problem was raised upstream at https://github.com/h5py/h5py/issues/1927 Makes it difficult to test if we can't reproduce it on all armhf environments. A patch was suggested for the ups

Bug#837796: paraview: segfaults when performing query-based selections

2024-01-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #837796 Control: fixed -1 5.11.0+dfsg-1 I think this problem is now dealt with (paraview 5.11). The query-based selection is not segfaulting now. The values are found as described in the tutorial, and the 3D can image gets highlighting indicated the selection

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

2024-01-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #894462 The png generated by the procedure in this bug looks fine to me, using current paraview (5.11). It's slightly blurry but no more than you'd expect for a png file (it's raster image format, not a vector image format, you can't expect to main high resolut

Bug#754968: paraview: cmake crashes when find paraview

2024-01-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #754968 find_package(ParaView) is now operating successfully in cmake. (needs libgdal-dev) That's with paraview-dev 5.11.2+dfsg-4 and cmake 3.28.1-1. Can you confirm paraview is now working for you from cmake, and we can close this bug? -- debian-science-mai

Bug#959677: paraview: Python calculator does not work

2024-01-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #959677 The calculator seems to be working fine e.g. tutorial steps at https://docs.paraview.org/en/latest/UsersGuide/filteringData.html#python-calculator change the colour of the sphere depending on the value entered in the calculator. Can you confirm you inst

Bug#753685: dist-packages/paraview/ColorMaps.xml missing

2024-01-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #753685 I suspect the problem with ColorMaps is fixed in paraview 5.11 but can't confirm since paraview.simple has other issues. It wants to use inspect.getargspec, but there's no such function anymore (python 3.11). $ python3 -c "import paraview.simple" ( 0.

Bug#688875: paraview: cannot select and copy current time

2024-01-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #688875 I can't see a "Current Time Controls" toolbar in paraview 5.11. Is it the "Time Inspector" tool bar? Are your requirements now met in paraview 5.11? Can we close this bug? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-li

Bug#954329: paraview: opacity incorrectly handled by the debian bullseye(testing) package paraview-5.7

2024-01-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Followup-For: Bug #954329 I can't see a problem with the test file using latest paraview 5.11. It displays a translucent sphere coloured red on one side, blue on the other. Can you confirm this bug has now been fixed? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-

Bug#1059842: FTBFS: test fails: ZFP lib not compiled with -DBIT_STREAM_WORD_TYPE=uint8

2024-01-02 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-hdf5plugin Version: 4.0.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS python3-hdf5plugin has started failing testZfp, causing both FTBFS and debci failure. The error message from debci is 56s ERROR: testZfp (__main__.TestHDF5PluginRW.testZfp) (options={'lossless': False}, dtype=)

Bug#1059791: python3-mpi4py: testPackUnpackExternal alignment error on sparc64

2024-01-01 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-mpi4py Version: 3.1.5-2 Severity: normal Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mpi4py/mpi4py/issues/147 sparc64 has started giving a Bus Error (Invalid address alignment) in testPackUnpackExternal (test_pack.TestPackExternal), testProbeRecv (test_p2p_obj_matched.TestP2PMatched

Bug#1058944: transition: petsc

2023-12-18 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:petsc I'd like to upgrade PETSc (and SLEPc, and their python packages) from 3.18 to 3.19. This is expected to fix the py

Bug#1057863: slepc4py ftbfs with Python 3.12

2023-12-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: slepc4py Followup-For: Bug #1057863 Correction: curexc_traceback is not used in slepc4py 3.19. Maybe it's time to upgrade to PETSc 3.19. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Bug#1057863: slepc4py ftbfs with Python 3.12

2023-12-17 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: slepc4py Followup-For: Bug #1057863 slepc4py does not use curexc_traceback. Perhaps this is a bug in cython? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1058353: libadios2-mpi-c-dev: ships headers already shipped in libadios2-common-c-dev

2023-12-13 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios2 Followup-For: Bug #1058353 Damn, something went badly wrong in debian/rules. Sorry about that. I'll fix it as soon as possible, in the meantime use the version in testing. Drew -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://a

Bug#1058018: libadios2-common-core-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/adios2/adios2-config.cmake

2023-12-11 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios2 Followup-For: Bug #1058018 Control: severity -1 important Call it teething issues. This is a new package, so I'm trying to avoid making debian/control more verbose than it needs to be by not crowding the fields with the strict specifications needed to avoid this error. Once the new

Bug#1043240: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1?

2023-12-10 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2023-12-10 21:55, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote: Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great and small! 3.) The following one-liner suggests 44 debian packages might be affected by the breaks Rebecca said would be caused by pandas 2.x: $ for s in augur c

Re: paraview_5.11.2+dfsg-2_source.changes REJECTED

2023-12-06 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2023-12-06 08:29, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: Hi Drew, * Drew Parsons [2023-12-05 10:10]: On 2023-12-05 05:18, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:27:53PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2023-12-04 23:24, Debian FTP Masters wrote: paraview source: lintian output: 'li

Re: paraview_5.11.2+dfsg-2_source.changes REJECTED

2023-12-05 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2023-12-05 05:18, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:27:53PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2023-12-04 23:24, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > paraview source: lintian output: 'license-problem-json-evil > VTK/ThirdParty/fides/vtkfides/thirdparty/rapidjson/fidesrapidjson/

Re: paraview_5.11.2+dfsg-2_source.changes REJECTED

2023-12-04 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2023-12-04 23:24, Debian FTP Masters wrote: paraview source: lintian output: 'license-problem-json-evil VTK/ThirdParty/fides/vtkfides/thirdparty/rapidjson/fidesrapidjson/license.txt', automatically rejected package. paraview source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag

Bug#1016430: netgen: New upstream version 6.2.2007 available / why is the version overriden with +really?

2023-11-14 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2023-11-13 22:31, Kurt Kremitzki wrote: Hello Drew, ... Debian builds were only succeeding on amd64 but failing on all the other architectures: i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mipsel, mips64el, ppc64el, and s390x. I was able to fix some of the problems by switching to an older version (thus th

Bug#1016430: netgen: New upstream version 6.2.2007 available / why is the version overriden with +really?

2023-11-13 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: netgen Followup-For: Bug #1016430 I've prepared netgen 6.2.2305 in experimental. I guess we might as well close this bug when it gets uploaded to unstable. Still, I'd also be interested to hear what the motivation was for the +really6.2.1905 version. -- debian-science-maintainers maili

Bug#910247: python3-netgen: importing netgen.gui fails due to MPI_Comm_size()

2023-11-09 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-netgen Version: 6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfsg-10 Followup-For: Bug #910247 As a workaround, initialise MPI before importing netgen.gui. > from mpi4py import MPI > import netgen.gui -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net http

Bug#1054712: ensmallen: FTBFS: adam_test.cpp:17:10: fatal error: catch2/catch.hpp: No such file or directory

2023-10-31 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: ensmallen Followup-For: Bug #1054712 Should be noted that the problem is linked to debian patch 0002-use-system-catch.patch, which disables upstream's local copy of catch in order to use the system catch2 library. So one workaround could be to disable 0002-use-system-catch.patch. -- deb

Bug#1054712: ensmallen: FTBFS: adam_test.cpp:17:10: fatal error: catch2/catch.hpp: No such file or directory

2023-10-31 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: ensmallen Followup-For: Bug #1054712 Control: forwarded 1054712 https://github.com/mlpack/ensmallen/issues/372 This error occurs because of the upgrade of catch2 from v2 to v3. Unfortunately ensmallen upstream don't sound very enthusiastic about dealing with it, https://github.com/mlpack/

Bug#1054159: paraview: build and provide gmsh plugin

2023-10-18 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Version: 5.11.0+dfsg-2 Severity: normal paraview offers a GMSH plugin, providing the capability to visualise gmsh meshes. It's not built by default, can it be added to the debian paraview package? Actually there's two of them, https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/paraview/-/tr

Bug#1053090: libxsimd-dev: arm64 error in xtensor: usage of batch type with unsupported type

2023-10-18 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: xtensor Version: 0.24.7-4 Followup-For: Bug #1053090 Control: severity 1053090 important xsimd support is optional for xtensor. Use of batch is apparently not expected to be routinely used anyway. See further discussion at https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd/issues/945 In summary, xte

Bug#1053854: xsimd: error: ‘aligned_mode’ in namespace ‘xsimd’ does not name a type

2023-10-12 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: xsimd Version: 10.0.0-3 Severity: important Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd/issues/954 Control: affects -1 libxtensor-dev xtensor 0.24.7 tests are exposing an error in xsimd 10.0.0 on less common architectures armel, ppc64el and s390x, seen in debian CI tests a

Bug#1053314: Depends: python3-h5py-mpi without python3-h5py

2023-10-10 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2023-10-10 09:26, Rafael Laboissière wrote: * Rafael Laboissière [2023-10-09 08:30]: […] At least, I hope that version 3.1.0+dfsg2-5 will really fix Bug#1053314 and the h5py transition will be completed. Unfortunately, it is still not working: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >