Re: onetbb_2021.4.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2022-02-03 Thread M. Zhou
Hi, Thanks a lot to Scott for the review! @Andreas: Thanks, please go ahead. Ping me if it FTBFS or any patch needs a rebase. On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 17:22 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 03:00:08PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > > > Normally for a

Re: onetbb_2021.4.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2022-02-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Scott, Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 03:00:08PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > Normally for a package already in Debian I wouldn't reject due to copyright/ > license documentation, but I am making an exception is this case. I only > started to look at this package by doing grep -ir copyright *

onetbb_2021.4.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2022-02-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
Normally for a package already in Debian I wouldn't reject due to copyright/ license documentation, but I am making an exception is this case. I only started to look at this package by doing grep -ir copyright * over the source. I made redirected the output of that to a file and made a list of