woo_1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
woo_1.0-1.dsc
woo_1.0.orig.tar.gz
woo_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz
python-woo_1.0-1_amd64.deb
python3-woo_1.0-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
binary:python-woo is NEW.
binary:python3-woo is NEW.
source:woo is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 749921 +wontfix
Bug #749921 [src:vtk6] Provide symbol file
Added tag(s) wontfix.
fixed 773380 6.2.0+dfsg1-2
Bug #773380 [libvtk6.1] Bogus description in d/control
There is no source info for the package 'libvtk6.1' at version '6.2.0+dfsg1-2'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfixed 750200 6.2.0+dfsg1-2
Bug #750200 [vtk6] Do not hardcode tcl version
No longer marked as fixed in versions vtk6/6.2.0+dfsg1-2.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
750200:
Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2015 09:24:04 +0200
with message-id
CALF6qJnF=y57xam4yddnc+u_zaswmongjj7gmrpv0uvhhcb...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #749921,
regarding Provide symbol file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2015 09:24:04 +0200
with message-id
CALF6qJnF=y57xam4yddnc+u_zaswmongjj7gmrpv0uvhhcb...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #750171,
regarding Get rid of libvtk6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2015 09:24:04 +0200
with message-id
CALF6qJnF=y57xam4yddnc+u_zaswmongjj7gmrpv0uvhhcb...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #750200,
regarding Do not hardcode tcl version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2015 09:24:04 +0200
with message-id
CALF6qJnF=y57xam4yddnc+u_zaswmongjj7gmrpv0uvhhcb...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #773380,
regarding Bogus description in d/control
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Kartik,
please add the missing license of
apertium-af-nl-0.2.0~r57554/paper/linguho.sty
to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:59:34 +0530
Source: apertium-cy-en
Binary: apertium-cy-en
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.1~r57554-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 20:24:04 +0530
Source: apertium-br-fr
Binary: apertium-br-fr
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.0~r61325-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:36:45 +0200
Source: octomap
Binary: liboctomap1.6v5 octomap-tools liboctomap-dev liboctomap1.6v5-dbg
libdynamicedt3d1.6 libdynamicedt3d-dev libdynamicedt3d1.6-dbg liboctovis1.6v5
liboctovis-dev
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 12:02:06 +0200
Source: ipe
Binary: ipe libipe7.1.4v5 libipe-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 7.1.4-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was a...@debian.org).
usertags 794621 piuparts
Usertags were: piuparts.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
affects 794621 + ecatools libecasoundc-dev
Bug #794621
Your message dated Sat, 08 Aug 2015 10:00:38 +
with message-id e1zo0ve-0003t5...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#791079: fixed in ipe 7.1.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #791079,
regarding ipe: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 08 Aug 2015 10:00:56 +
with message-id e1zo0vw-00041x...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#791221: fixed in octomap 1.6.8+dfsg-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #791221,
regarding octomap: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
to be marked
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
please add the missing license of
apertium-af-nl-0.2.0~r57554/paper/linguho.sty
to your debian/copyright.
Oops!
Should I put complete text of http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt (LPPL)?
--
Kartik
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015, Kartik Mistry wrote:
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
please add the missing license of
apertium-af-nl-0.2.0~r57554/paper/linguho.sty
to your debian/copyright.
Oops!
Should I put complete text of http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt (LPPL)?
Yes, please.
Possibly a help2man https://bugs.debian.org/787444 version below
1.47.1 is used on the build server and help2man doesn't support
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH before this date. (See:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal). I'm not
familiar with the debian automated build
Hi,
I'm new to Debian maintain 'Limereg' in DebSci. What would be the best
way to examine the Debian build toolchain being used for a released
package ?
I need to find out the version of help2man being used for fixing the
bugs below.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792624
20 matches
Mail list logo
