pyviennacl is marked for autoremoval from testing

pyviennacl 1.0.2+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-09-28 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 795544: fglrx-driver: xorg: open source video drivers flawed? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://list

Приветики

facеbook Римма пишет: Зарабатывайте на бинарных опционах уже сегодня! Самый популярный вид заработка онлайн. Заработать сейчас Сообщение было отправлено на debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org. Если вы не хотите получать эти эл. письма от Facebook, либо если вы не хотите, чтобы

Bug#793012: gmp-ecm: FTBFS on mipsel: bad assembly?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Arturo: Have you made any progress ? Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV2QsmAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjxcQH/j96ha2fKrodVdu8E9MxMB7F bMdpC5SokKhRh+Eu6rZGioC59DecM8HkAPuuqiYsmazYe2mNFLpf2rseiTC3jb3V IdiTlxfV9XkpU

berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:36:28 +0200 Source: berkeley-abc Binary: berkeley-abc Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Chan

Processing of berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2_amd64.changes

berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2.dsc berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2_amd64.deb Greetings,

REPLY

Dearest One I feel quite safe in dealing with you in this Mutual Beneficial transaction. Though, this medium (Internet) has been greatly abused, I choose to reach you through it because it Still remains the fastest,and most secured Medium of communication. However, this transaction is purely priv

Processed: Re: Bug#796544: osrm: FTBFS: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::io::StringOutputStream::StringOutputStream(std::string*)'

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 791173 Bug #796544 [src:osrm] osrm: FTBFS: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::io::StringOutputStream::StringOutputStream(std::string*)' 796544 was blocked by: 791246 796544 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 796544: 791173 -- 79

Processed: Re: Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #791173 {Done: Simon McVittie } [src:libstxxl] libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791173 to the same values previously set -- 791173: http://bugs.debian.

Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Control: reopen -1 On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:03:51 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:12:19 +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package > >maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might > >break s

rw 0.7-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the rw source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.7-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei

graywolf 0.1.2-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the graywolf source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.1.2-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wi

compute 0.4-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the compute source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.4-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

Bug#792624: Bugfix uploaded, but the package remains on the old verison ?

Roelof, On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 09:38:12AM +0200, David Bremner wrote: > Roelof Berg writes: > > > Hi, > > > > this is about the third or fourth time I'm asking this. Any help would > > be greatly aprechiated. > > > > I uploaded a new version 1.4.0-2 of limereg that fixes #792624 and > > #7926

sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Mapping sid to unstable. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:15:59 +0200 Source: sagemath-database-elliptic-curves Binary: sagemath-database-elliptic-curves Architecture: source all Version: 0.8-1 Distribution: sid Urgency: medium Maint

sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Mapping sid to unstable. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:09:29 +0200 Source: sagemath-database-graphs Binary: sagemath-database-graphs Architecture: source all Version: 20150724+dfsg-1 Distribution: sid Urgency: medium Maintainer: D

Processing of sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg-1.dsc sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2 sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz sagemath-database-graphs_2

Processing of sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8-1_amd64.changes

sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8-1.dsc sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8.orig.tar.bz2 sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8-1.debian.tar.xz sagemath-database-elliptic-cur

Bug#786122: marked as done (lhapdf: deprecation of python-support)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:41:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#786122: fixed in lhapdf 5.9.1-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #786122, regarding lhapdf: deprecation of python-support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

lhapdf_5.9.1-3.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 10:38:17 +0200 Source: lhapdf Binary: liblhapdf0 liblhapdf-dev python-lhapdf octave-lhapdf lhapdf-pdfsets-minimal lhapdf-ccwrap-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 5.9.1-3.1 Distribution: unsta

Processing of lhapdf_5.9.1-3.1_amd64.changes

lhapdf_5.9.1-3.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lhapdf_5.9.1-3.1.dsc lhapdf_5.9.1-3.1.debian.tar.xz lhapdf-ccwrap-doc_5.9.1-3.1_all.deb lhapdf-pdfsets-minimal_5.9.1-3.1_all.deb liblhapdf-dev_5.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb liblhapdf0_5.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb oct

Bug#792625: Bug#792624: Bugfix uploaded, but the package remains on the old verison ?

Roelof Berg writes: > Hi, > > this is about the third or fourth time I'm asking this. Any help would > be greatly aprechiated. > > I uploaded a new version 1.4.0-2 of limereg that fixes #792624 and > #792625. But I don't see the new version on: > http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/imageana

Bug#792624: Bugfix uploaded, but the package remains on the old verison ?

Hi, this is about the third or fourth time I'm asking this. Any help would be greatly aprechiated. I uploaded a new version 1.4.0-2 of limereg that fixes #792624 and #792625. But I don't see the new version on: http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/imageanalysis , so I cannot close the bug