Processed: Re: dolfin-bin: FEniCS/DOLFIN fails to compile Python dolfin.Expression()

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 782029 libsuitesparse-metis-dev Bug #782029 [dolfin-bin] dolfin-bin: FEniCS/DOLFIN fails to compile Python dolfin.Expression() Bug reassigned from package 'dolfin-bin' to 'libsuitesparse-metis-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#782029: dolfin-bin: FEniCS/DOLFIN fails to compile Python dolfin.Expression()

reassign 782029 libsuitesparse-metis-dev retitle 782029 build multiarch installation of suitesparse-metis  severity 782029 serious thanks On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:57:40 -0700 Jan Medlock wrote: >  > Removing '/x86_64-linux-gnu' from the paths to the libsuitesparse

Bug#806198: siscone: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_testroot in build-indep)

tags 806198 + patch thanks As explained in the previous message, this is the patch I would apply if this were my package. Now "dpkg-buildpackage -A" works again. This is of course a lot better than not working at all, but be careful because now "dpkg-buildpackage -A" creates a siscone-doc-html

Processed: Re: Bug#806198: siscone: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_testroot in build-indep)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 806198 + patch Bug #806198 [src:siscone] siscone: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_testroot in build-indep) Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 806198:

Processed: Reopen

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 784505 Bug #784505 {Done: Anton Gladky } [src:paraview] [paraview] Qt4's WebKit removal 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to

Bug#784505: Reopen

reopen 784505 notfixed 784505 5.0.1+dfsg1-1 thanks -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

openblas_0.2.18-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 18:40:31 +0200 Source: openblas Binary: libopenblas-base libopenblas-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.2.18-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Bug#821299: marked as done (vmtk: BD insighttoolkit4-dev Uninstallable on most archs previously built)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2016 17:11:23 + with message-id <20160417171123.gc12...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#821299: vmtk: BD insighttoolkit4-dev Uninstallable on most archs previously built has caused the Debian Bug report #821299, regarding vmtk: BD insighttoolkit4-dev

Processing of openblas_0.2.18-1_amd64.changes

openblas_0.2.18-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openblas_0.2.18-1.dsc openblas_0.2.18.orig.tar.gz openblas_0.2.18-1.debian.tar.xz libopenblas-base-dbgsym_0.2.18-1_amd64.deb libopenblas-base_0.2.18-1_amd64.deb libopenblas-dev_0.2.18-1_amd64.deb

Bug#821297: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libvmtk-dev | 1.0.1-3+b1 | arm64, hurd-i386, mips64el, ppc64el libvmtk-dev | 1.0.1-3+b2 | armel, armhf, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x libvmtk1.0 | 1.0.1-3+b1

Bug#798665: marked as done (mmtk: FTBFS: Not compatible with python-numpy 1.9)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2016 16:31:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#821214: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #798665, regarding mmtk: FTBFS: Not compatible with python-numpy 1.9 to be marked as done. This

Bug#821214: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 2.7.9-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package mmtk has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/821214 The

Bug#800460: mathgl: Test program fails to build, syntax error in header

Le 15/04/2016 21:37, Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos a écrit : C++11 features have been disabled at configuration time, so the package builds without enabling theese features. Hence I cannot see the point of using the compilation option -std=cpp. I understand that C++11 have been disabled to make

Bug#821299: vmtk: BD insighttoolkit4-dev Uninstallable on most archs previously built

RM Bug is #821297 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#821299: vmtk: BD insighttoolkit4-dev Uninstallable on most archs previously built

Source: vmtk Version: 1.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBS but previously did Insighttoolkit no longer builds for archs except i386 and amd6, therefore the B-D is no longer available. To get forward with decrufting old packaged (vmtk keeps them from being removed) I filed #xx to get

Bug#821298: vmtk: FTBFS on all amd64 / i386

Source: vmtk Version: 1.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS See buildd logs for details: Snippet: dh_install -ppython-vmtk debian/tmp/usr/lib/vmtk/*PythonD.* usr/lib dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "debian/tmp/usr/lib/vmtk/*PythonD.*" (tried in "." and "debian/tmp")

Bug#821297: RM: vmtk [arm64 armel armhf mips mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x alpha hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 m68k mips64el powerpcspe ppc64 sh4 sparc64 x32] -- RoQA; B-Ds no longer avai

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal vmtk B-D on libinsighttoolkit4-dev which is no longer built. This request removes from all archs except amd64 and i386. (I will file a seperate bug against vmtk once I have the bug number, as this RC for vmtk) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

getfem++_5.0-1_ppc64el.changes is NEW

binary:libgetfem5++ is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the

Bug#820450: yade: FTBFS with glibc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope

Hi Gert, thanks for your patch. I will apply it shortly. Regards Anton 2016-04-17 10:17 GMT+02:00 Gert Wollny : > Hi, > > I've updated the patch to use the std:: namespace prefix instead of > "using std::xxx" - in the header files this is a cleaner approach. > > Best,

Processing of getfem++_5.0-1_ppc64el.changes

getfem++_5.0-1_ppc64el.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: getfem++_5.0-1.dsc getfem++_5.0.orig.tar.gz getfem++_5.0-1.debian.tar.xz libgetfem++-dev_5.0-1_ppc64el.deb libgetfem5++-dbgsym_5.0-1_ppc64el.deb libgetfem5++_5.0-1_ppc64el.deb

Bug#820450: yade: FTBFS with glibc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope

Hi,  I've updated the patch to use the std:: namespace prefix instead of  "using std::xxx" - in the header files this is a cleaner approach.  Best,  Gert  --- a/gui/qt4/GLViewer.cpp +++ b/gui/qt4/GLViewer.cpp @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ if(not(rb->bound)){ rb->updateBound();} min=rb->bound->min;

Bug#818817: woo: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope (patch)

Control: tags -1 patch  Hi,  the attached patch adds std:: to all instances of isnan and isinf in the c++ code, and this fixes the bug.  Best,  Gert  --- a/core/Cell.cpp +++ b/core/Cell.cpp @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ // spin tensor W=.5*(gradV-gradV.transpose()); spinVec=.5*leviCivita(W); - //

Processed: Re: woo: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope (patch)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch  Bug #818817 [woo] woo: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope Added tag(s) patch. -- 818817: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818817 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --