Une eau douce chez vous pour 1 € par jour

2016-12-10 Thread Hygieau
Contre le calcaire, le ligne terne, les problèmes de peau, ... Vous aimez le confort ? Découvrez en plus sur l'adoucisseur d'eau. CE MOIS-CI VOTRE ADOUCISSEUR LIVRÉ ET POSÉ CHEZ VOUS à partir de 1€ PAR JOUR* Faites confiance au N°1 du traitement d'eau L´installation d´un adoucisseur perm

pysph is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-12-10 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
pysph 0~20160514.git91867dc-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-01-16 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 846771: python-traits: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 2.7 returned exit code 13 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-sc

r-cran-isocodes_2016.12.09-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:12:48 +0100 Source: r-cran-isocodes Binary: r-cran-isocodes Architecture: source Version: 2016.12.09-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team Changed-By: Sébastien V

Processing of r-cran-isocodes_2016.12.09-1_source.changes

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
r-cran-isocodes_2016.12.09-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: r-cran-isocodes_2016.12.09-1.dsc r-cran-isocodes_2016.12.09.orig.tar.gz r-cran-isocodes_2016.12.09-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.o

Re: Bug#847699: apophenia FTBFS on several architectures: distances: The error is 0.0220695, which is too big (> 0.02).

2016-12-10 Thread Jerome BENOIT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Adrian, thanks for your hint. On 10/12/16 18:05, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: apophenia > Version: 1.0+ds-4 > Severity: serious > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apophenia&suite=sid > > ... > PASS: lognormal_test > FAIL: ../

yade_2016.06a-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:18:05 +0100 Source: yade Binary: yade libyade python-yade yade-doc Architecture: source Version: 2016.06a-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By:

Processing of yade_2016.06a-7_source.changes

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
yade_2016.06a-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yade_2016.06a-7.dsc yade_2016.06a-7.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@list

Bug#846445: marked as done (openfoam: add libfl-dev to Build-Depends)

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:05:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#846445: fixed in openfoam 4.0+dfsg1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #846445, regarding openfoam: add libfl-dev to Build-Depends to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:48:12 +0100 Source: ovito Binary: ovito ovito-doc Architecture: source Version: 2.8.0+dfsg2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Anton Gladky

openfoam_4.0+dfsg1-8_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:53:51 +0100 Source: openfoam Binary: openfoam libopenfoam openfoam-examples Architecture: source Version: 4.0+dfsg1-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers C

Processing of openfoam_4.0+dfsg1-8_source.changes

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
openfoam_4.0+dfsg1-8_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openfoam_4.0+dfsg1-8.dsc openfoam_4.0+dfsg1-8.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-m

Bug#846702: marked as done (yorick-hdf5: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2)

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:45:30 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#846702: yorick-hdf5: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2 has caused the Debian Bug report #846702, regarding yorick-hdf5: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2 to be

Processing of ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-2_source.changes

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-2.dsc ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-main

Bug#847699: apophenia FTBFS on several architectures: distances: The error is 0.0220695, which is too big (> 0.02).

2016-12-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: apophenia Version: 1.0+ds-4 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apophenia&suite=sid ... PASS: lognormal_test FAIL: ../eg/test_updating PASS: ../eg/transform PASS: test_apop = apophenia 1.0: tests/test-suite.log ==

Bug#835406: marked as done (trilinos: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures)

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:52:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#847431: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #835406, regarding trilinos: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#836130: marked as done (trilinos: FTBFS without __sync_val_compare_and_swap_8)

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:52:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#847431: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #835406, regarding trilinos: FTBFS without __sync_val_compare_and_swap_8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#650794: marked as done (python-pytrilinos: Please build package against default python)

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:52:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#847431: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #650794, regarding python-pytrilinos: Please build package against default python to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#847431: Removed package(s) from unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 12.10.1-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package trilinos has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/847431 Th

Bug#847431: Removed package(s) from unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libtrilinos-amesos-dev | 12.6.4-1+b1 | armhf, i386 libtrilinos-amesos12 | 12.6.4-1+b1 | armhf, i386 libtrilinos-amesos2-12 | 12.6.4-1+b1 | armhf, i386 libtrilinos-amesos2-dev | 12.6.4-1+b1

Bug#847430: Removed package(s) from unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libdeal.ii-8.4.2 |8.4.2-2 | armhf, i386 libdeal.ii-dev |8.4.2-2 | armhf, i386 --- Reason --- ROM; trilinos broken on 32-bit

r-cran-rnetcdf 1.8-2-1 MIGRATED to testing

2016-12-10 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the r-cran-rnetcdf source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.6.3-1-1 Current version: 1.8-2-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wil

apertium-apy_0.9.1~r343-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:11:19 +0530 Source: apertium-apy Binary: apertium-apy Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.1~r343-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team Changed-By: Kartik Mistry D

Processing of apertium-apy_0.9.1~r343-2_amd64.changes

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
apertium-apy_0.9.1~r343-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-apy_0.9.1~r343-2.dsc apertium-apy_0.9.1~r343-2.debian.tar.xz apertium-apy_0.9.1~r343-2_all.deb apertium-apy_0.9.1~r343-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (r

ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 14:24:27 +0100 Source: ovito Binary: ovito ovito-doc Architecture: source Version: 2.8.0+dfsg2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Anton Gladky

Bug#802481: marked as done (apertium-en-ca: please make the build reproducible)

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:06:57 +0530 with message-id and subject line Fixed in 0.9.3~r61328-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #802481, regarding apertium-en-ca: please make the build reproducible to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Processing of ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-1_source.changes

2016-12-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-1.dsc ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2.orig.tar.xz ovito_2.8.0+dfsg2-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers

Bug#847654: Qt5 version is required

2016-12-10 Thread matt . nottingham
Package: python-qwt Version: 0.5.5-1 Severity: wishlist With the removal of Qt4 from repository as we go forward, it is becoming more important that a Qt5 version of this package is produced. Looking at the homepage for this package, it should just require 'recompiling'? Thanks, Matt -- Syste