Hi Ghis,
On 12/14/2016 09:30 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Thanks for your contribution. Let me know if a long-term solution comes up
> later.
Sure. I closed the bug on the changelog, but, you can keep it open to track
the final and long term solution.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing lis
cy=medium
+
+ * Avoid running tests with long double on ppc64el due to failing tests
+(Closes: #844403)
+ * Add build-dependency for latex.
+
+ -- Breno Leitao Fri, 09 Dec 2016 16:12:51 -0500
+
nfft (3.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version 3.3.2
diff -Nru nfft-3.3
Hello Ghislain,
On 12/09/2016 07:01 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> I might eventually just bypass testing for ppc64el to let the package
> transition to testing, unless you think you are gonna have a fix ready very
> soon. With the transition window extended to 10 days and the soft-freeze
> deadli
We just created a pull request to have this fixed upstream.
https://github.com/pydata/numexpr/pull/235
Should we create a Debian patch also?
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debi
On 11/27/2016 07:16 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:49:29 -0200 Breno Leitao wrote:
>> I am looking at this issue, and the first test set is checkall.
>>
>> If I run it inside dpkg-buildpackage, it fails as in the log, but, if I run
>> it isolated,
I am looking at this issue, and the first test set is checkall.
If I run it inside dpkg-buildpackage, it fails as in the log, but, if I run
it isolated, I see no errors, as showed:
$ ./checkall 2>&1 | grep -i fail
$
Looking all tests I see "-> OK". Anyway, I am continue to debug what is the
On 11/20/2016 07:41 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Lots of failures like:
>
Yes. I just tried it here, and more than 40 tests failed.
It is usually off by 1, and I am wondering if we are being bite by a similar
issue I found on OpenJDK, where there are math inconsistency when using
optimization hig
Is anyone looking/debugging this issue?
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
ebian/changelog 2012-05-13 10:38:30.0 -0400
+++ critterding-1.0-beta12.1/debian/changelog 2016-07-17 17:11:02.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+critterding (1.0-beta12.1-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fixing FTBFS on GCC 6. (Closes: 811621)
+
+ -- Breno Leitao
-beta12.1/debian/changelog 2016-07-17 17:11:02.0
-0400
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+critterding (1.0-beta12.1-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fixing FTBFS on GCC 6. (Closes: 811621)
+
+ -- Breno Leitao Sun, 17 Jul 2016 16:46:12 -0400
+
critterding (1.0-beta12.1-1.2
I am looking at this problem, and I understand that the following patch fixes
this problem:
--- critterding-1.0-beta12.1.orig/src/brainz/brainz.cpp
+++ critterding-1.0-beta12.1/src/brainz/brainz.cpp
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ Brainz::Brainz()
// clear Motor Outputs
Source: clblas
Version: 6
Severity: wishlist
Currently, clblas has altivec disabled due to bug #798024.
This causes some performance issue on ppc64el platform.
I am opening this bug to track altivec enablement for clblas.
I might also work to have this solved.
Breno
-- System Information:
Debi
Control: retitle -1 "healpy FTBFS on arm64, ppc64 and ppc64el test failure"
Hi,
The same problem happen on ppc64el, as the following log shows:
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_logs/logs/healpy_1.8.1-1_ppc64el.build
I created the following upstream bug also:
https
Package: mmdb
Version: 1.25.5-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the
Source: blitz++
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the
Source: libgtkdatabox
Version: 0.9.2.0
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the outdated package autotools files, mainly because
it fails to understand that the new architectures has sup
Package: opencv
Version: 2.4.8+dfsg1-2.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
With the recent changes in tbb package, now it builds on ppc64el, so, we should
enable opencv to depend on tbb as the other architectures.
I just created
I am still facing the same issue on package 2.0.0-5, which is suppose
to contain the fix.
I tested on ppc64el, take a look at the problem, which seems to be the same.
The following tests FAILED:
1 - INTEGRATION_audio (Timeout)
3 - INTEGRATION_cfm_damp
Package: libmatio
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
The package libmatio does not build on new architecture because the libtool
files is not updated automatically by either autoreconf (just updates the
config fil
Hi Sylvestre,
On 06/26/2014 02:33 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 26/06/2014 09:53, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> Source: timblserver
>> /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -g -O2
>> -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-secur
Source: ticcutils
Version: 0.4-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
The package ticcutils fails to build on ppc64el, as on new architectures,
because the config.{guess,sub}
Package: healpix-cxx
Version: 3.11.2-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Hi,
The package healpix-cxx fails to build on ppc64el, as on new architectures,
because the config.{guess,sub} files
I just reproduced this bug on the ppc64el buildd. This is exact some error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
http://deb1.ltc.br.ibm.com/wanna-buildd-upstream/logs/pynac_0.2.6-1_ppc64el-20140510-0908.build
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
23 matches
Mail list logo
