Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:18:30AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote: > [binutils] just turn it off > > @Felix Agreed? sure, makes sense! let's postpone the static link bfd thing. thank you felix -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:07:11PM +0200, Massimiliano Leoni wrote: > The latest update of binutils to version 2.26.1-1 makes it imopssible to > compile against trilinos. The linker complains > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libbfd-2.26-system.so, needed by > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/..

Re: Trilinos packages

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:58:02PM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > As for the prefixing of the libraries with "trilinos_", I'd rather > refrain from it for the moment. The arguments I can see for this i see. perhaps it would be helpful to dig out the the referenced 'discussion with the ftpmaster' fo

Re: Trilinos packages

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:22:23AM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > I would suggest to first go with a monolithic > package and split it up at a later point. yes. the old trilinos debian source package had a libname.patch and a soname.patch, these fix the names for a monolithic package. i suggest to

Re: Trilinos packages

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:15:49PM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > A quick poll on the Trilinos package naming: > Right now, we have "libtrilinos", which triggers a > package-name-doesnt-match-sonames warning since none of the Trilinos > libraries is called libtrilinos.* (rather libepetra.*, libbelos

Re: Trilinos packages

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 01:51:24PM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > I checked all other dependencies manually and found that > libparmetis-dev was the only thing from non-free. I removed it from > the list; please retry building. the build succeeded without the ENABLE_ParMETIS switch (takes forever..

Re: Trilinos packages

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:33:26AM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Are there general Debian guidelines for such situations? i'm sorry i don't know or care. i'm not even sure in which way non-free is (not) a part of debian. > What's your opinion on this? imo it's best to avoid trouble (here: non-fr

Re: Trilinos packages

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Strange, libparmetis-dev should be in jessie, cf. > . indeed it is, and i missed that. curiously, parmetis is non-free, and that is why i missed it. from my understanding (to some

Re: Trilinos packages

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 12:39:57AM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > 1) Set VCS=fields > > 2) Standards-Version is 3.9.5 now > > 3) Use DEP-3 for patches (Description, Author, Last-Updates is enough) > > 4) Remove some unnecessary comments from debian/rules. > > It should be as short as possible.