On 03/04/17 23:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Leopold,
>
> the license block still contains the "or (at your option) any later
> version"-clause.
>
>Thorsten
Hi Thorsten!!!
I understood finally the difference of GPL-3 and GPL-3+. I'm sorry if I'm so
dummy, but I didn't find any
El 30/03/17 a les 07:25, dada ha escrit:
> Hello Mattia and Andreas,
> Thank you for your very quick reply and clear explanations !
> I will read carefully the documentation about copyright statement and
> fix the related problems.
> Thank you again, See you soon, Damien.
[...]
I would recommend
El 28/03/17 a les 00:51, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda ha escrit:
> El 27/03/17 a les 23:00, Thorsten Alteholz ha escrit:
>>
>> Hi Leopold,
>>
>> V8/inst/doc/v8_intro.html doesn't really look like the preferred form for
>> modifications. So please ask upstream
El 27/03/17 a les 23:00, Thorsten Alteholz ha escrit:
>
> Hi Leopold,
>
> V8/inst/doc/v8_intro.html doesn't really look like the preferred form for
> modifications. So please ask upstream for the real source of this file.
>
Hi Thorsten,
I didn't see that js encrypted code there.
Thanks,
El 27/03/17 a les 23:00, Thorsten Alteholz ha escrit:
>
> Hi Leopold,
>
> if your package is licensed under GPL-3, you should not use the
> GPL-3+ template in your debian/copyright.
>
ought,
it's curious. dh-make -s -c gpl3 generate this template:
License: GPL-3.0+
This program is free
El 27/03/17 a les 23:00, Thorsten Alteholz ha escrit:
>
> Hi Leoppold,
>
> please mention Cory LaViska in your debian/copyright.
>
Hi Thorsten,
neither decopy or debmake noticed about that copyright. Also
licensecheck failed :-(
Tomorrow I will fix.
Leopold
--
--
Linux User 152692
Hi Andreas,
On 20/03/17 17:42, Andreas Tille wrote:
[]
>
> What about trying to maintain these yourself inside the Debian Science
> team. Packaging CRAN packages became tremendiously easy since Gordon
> Ball has written the debhelper module. Just download the tarballs from
> CRAN unpack
Hi,
I have seen that there are people around here have done a great job with
R-cran. So, I can only say a big thanks.
But, if I could ask something, I would need this two packages:
https://cran.r-project.org/package=V8
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shinyjs
There are dependencies of a
El Dimecres, 19 d'octubre de 2016, a les 09:31:40, Johannes Schauer va
escriure:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to package ROS bfl but have several questions for the ROS people
> among you.
>
> ROS bfl (http://wiki.ros.org/bfl) seems to be a copy of orocos bfl
> (http://www.orocos.org/bfl). Not only does
I have deleted the hack to activate the SSE code. It seems that has no sense.
Upstream clarifies in its CMakeLists: #always disable, for now.
It justs add -native as parameter to the compiler making it not generic. So
it's better to disable.
Please Jochen, could you upload it?
Best regards,
Hi guys,
Gianfranco Costamagna was working on this package yesterday. He pushed a NMU
and it's on delayed queue [1].
Just to inform you if you didn't know it.
Leo
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html
El Dimecres, 31 d'agost de 2016, a les 06:54:52, Anton Gladky va escriure:
> Hi
El Dimarts, 30 d'agost de 2016, a les 19:03:32, Gianfranco Costamagna va
escriure:
> control: reopen -1
> control: reassign -1 src:kido
> control: found -1 0.1.0+dfsg-1
> control: tags -1 patch
> control: tags -1 pending
>
> >I can confirm that this is not a bug in flann. As I said in a previous
El Dilluns, 29 d'agost de 2016, a les 12:34:15, Gianfranco Costamagna va
escriure:
> Source: flann
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1.9.1+dfsg-2
>
> Justification: breaks reverse dependencies.
>
> Hi, the latest flann broke kido build, now it fails with a missing LZ4 link.
there's no missing
El Dimarts, 13 d'octubre de 2015, a les 07:24:08, Rene Engelhard va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:27:15AM +, Wookey wrote:
> > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
> >
> > wookey pushed a change to branch master
> > in repository collada-dom.
>
--
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
--
El Dimecres, 6 de maig de 2015, a les 19:54:45, Anton Gladky va escriure:
Dear all,
what do you think, will it be possible for you to migrate
packages octovis and utopia-documents within the next
few weeks into Qt5, so we will then be able to escape keeping
libqglviewer built against qt4,
Dear ftp-masters,
I have pushed tree packages: catkin, bloom and catkin-pkg by error. Please
delete them. Sorry for the noise.
Leopold
--
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally
Hi James,
thanks for reporting it and the patch.
I have created a new version of the package. It's here:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/pcl
Now I will ask to the sponsor to upload the new version and ask to ftp-master
to unblock it.
Best regards,
Leopold
El Dimecres, 25 de febrer de
Source: pcl
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
pcl is an important library to work with pointcloulds. To have a debian
package is an important thing and one of the effects if to have the same
software for differents archs.
Currently, pcl it's only in amd64 and
A Divendres, 14 de novembre de 2014, Jakub Wilk va escriure:
Package: libgazebo-dev
Version: 3.0.0+dfsg-3
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
libgazebo-dev is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but the following file is
architecture-dependent:
anything :-(. After, I didn't pay attention in the warning in mentors. I'm
sorry.
Please upload it,
Best regards,
Leopold
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2014-10-26 3:21 GMT+09:00 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda l...@alaxarxa.net:
Yes,
thanks to report it.
it's a serious. Please, Jochen, could
Yes,
thanks to report it.
it's a serious. Please, Jochen, could you patch it in upstream?
Anyway, there's a new version of pcl 1.7.2-2 in:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/pcl
This new version solved the bug installing that files in:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/pcl/
following fhs and
Hi,
I'm thinking to package another piece of software under about robotics. When I
have login to alioth and chdir to /git/debian-science/packages I have realised
that:
$ ls -1 | grep .git | wc -l
425
so, we have 425 folders containing 425 git repos.
I thought that the packages from robotics
A Dijous, 13 de març de 2014, Anton Gladky va escriure:
Hi Jose,
as I understand, you will maintain this package under
Debian-Science team? If so, please, change debian/control
accordingly. Also it would be good, if the package will be
multiarched.
Hi Jose,
I agree with Anton about the
in the debian directory?
Regards,
Leopold
[1]
http://metadata.ftp-
master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/boost1.54/boost1.54
_1.54.0-5_changelog
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
l...@alaxarxa.net
wrote:
A Dimecres, 5 de març de 2014, Steve M
A Dimecres, 5 de març de 2014, Steve M. Robbins va escriure:
On March 3, 2014 09:22:01 AM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
[1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8731
[2] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84950
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904
A Diumenge, 2 de març de 2014, Jose Luis Rivero va escriure:
On 03/01/2014 04:01 AM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
On 03/01/2014 01:44 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
It's too late here and I'm too much tired. Jose if you could, please
take one
eye on this.
Yes, no problem. I
El Divendres, 28 de febrer de 2014, a les 19:22:43, Jose Luis Rivero va
escriure:
On 02/28/2014 06:26 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Leopold,
since I have trouble building ompl when I tried to sponsor it (see
extract of build log below) in a pbuilder environment I think it really
helps
28 matches
Mail list logo
