On 08/12/2014 10:48 PM, Christoph Berg wrote: > As postgis is also in the Recommends, the extra Recommends: > postgresql-9.4-postgis-2.1 should be redundant and could as well be > removed so science-geography doesn't need to track the PostgreSQL > version. This would be the nicer solution imho. > > Markus, what do you think about upgrading postgis' Suggests on > postgresql-9.4-postgis-2.1 to a Recommends?
As discussed, the suggestion from postgis has been upgraded to a recommendation. Starting with postgis_2.1.3+dfsg-4 (currently in the NEW queue), it's therefore sufficient to (only) recommend postgis, rather than postgresql-X.Y-postgis. Regards Markus Wanner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
