Bug#876300: libsundials-dev: libsundials-serial-dev is gone

2017-12-24 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 24/12/2017 04:10, Dima Kogan ha scritto: >> Should there be a transitional package to ease the migration ? > > There's nothing that depends on libsundials-serial-dev, so it's not > obvious to me we need a migration package. Why do you think we need it? > > dima Hi dima, It will cause breakag

Bug#876300: libsundials-dev: libsundials-serial-dev is gone

2017-09-20 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: libsundials-dev Version: 2.7.0+dfsg-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, on stretch libsundials-serial-dev is available. With the update 2.7.0 release this is not available anymore. I assume it is replaced by libsundials-dev. Should there be a transitional package to ease the migration

Bug#848859: [bug #25503] test failures

2017-02-11 Thread Paolo Greppi
Additional Item Attachment, bug #25503 (project getfem): File name: test-suite.log Size:1 KB File name: auto_gmm_torture01_lusolve.cc Size:2 KB ___ Reply to this item at: __

Bug#848859: [bug #25503] test failures

2017-02-10 Thread Paolo Greppi
URL: Summary: test failures Project: Getfem Submitted by: paolog Submitted on: Fri 10 Feb 2017 07:20:43 PM UTC Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 -

Bug#848859: reproducible here

2017-02-10 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, on a sid 2-core amd64 VM after locally building the package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" I have launched 200 times the test suite alone with "time make check &> xxx" (it takes about 3 min each so it's quicker than building the entire package). I get these 11 failures: 112:FAIL: make_gmm_tes

Bug#812157: status update

2016-10-09 Thread Paolo Greppi
The issue is still present in sundials 2.6.2. In the recently released 2.7.0 upstream have temporarily removed sundialsTB "until the development team has some cycles to spend updating it. We are optimistic that this will happen in the coming year." Upstream has already been notified of this, see: