Bug#834653: nlopt: typo in debian/rules (override_dh_auto_reconf -> override_dh_autoreconf)

On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 09:42:32PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Uploaded :) Do upgrade your lintian for your next package preparation > (eg. for at least Standards-Version: 4.0.0) I hope so, but not all warnings were fixed. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#834653: nlopt: typo in debian/rules (override_dh_auto_reconf -> override_dh_autoreconf)

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:32:09 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote: > I believe there is a typo in your debian/rules (override_dh_auto_reconf -> > override_dh_autoreconf). > > I don't believe this affects the working of the package, but if anyone > in the future added the "dh $@

Bug#862390: ship CMake config files with the nlopt package

severity 862390 wishlist thanks On Fri, 12 May 2017 09:51:29 +0200 sla...@staszic.waw.pl wrote: > These *.cmake files enable CMake users to use find_package(NLopt) in > their CMake scripts. > It would be great to ship these *.cmake files in the Debian package as > well. It should be easy, when

Bug#855600: src:nlopt: Please provide binary package for cxx library

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:03:19 -0800 Afif Elghraoui wrote: > Anyway, I see the packaging is still in SVN. I'll switch it to Git and > prepare a team upload. Please ask first other co-maintainers! Personally, I'm +1 for packaging in Git. Unfortunally, Christophe rejected this

Re: Wheezy backport of nlopt

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:37:40AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: just a heads up that 'm going to backport nlopt to Wheezy. Could you then push your changes in the repo, i.e. on the wheezy-backport branch? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Re: Wheezy backport of nlopt

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:55:47AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: Do I have access to it? Any member of debian-science group has. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org