Bug#707338: Bug#707341: upgrade to important, python-uno should go away

2015-05-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ Good that you didn't reply to me at the submitter at all. But instead to all the bugs I filed? So I didn't see your reply at all. Until now. ] On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:18:26PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > Well, since ATM there is neither any python-wxgtk3 (which > would also mean having to

Bug#707338: Bug#707341: upgrade to important, python-uno should go away

2014-09-22 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 08:03:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:07:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 04:23:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > still supporting python-uno gives much headache (for example it's build > > > > is

Bug#707338: Bug#707341: upgrade to important, python-uno should go away

2014-09-22 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:18:26PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert a écrit : > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:07:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 04:23:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > still supporting python-uno gives much headache (for example it's build is > > > a big h

Bug#707338: Bug#707341: upgrade to important, python-uno should go away

2014-06-30 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:07:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 04:23:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > still supporting python-uno gives much headache (for example it's build is > > a big hack and right now it's broken for wizard/lightproof usage inside LO. > > I am