Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
it is fine, the first upload is always tricky, after things are easier :) cheers, G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"James Clarke" Date:Sat, 17 Oct, 2015 at 17:33 Subject:Bug#787861: review: polyml Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository)

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-17 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling >> all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script >> requires gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have >> added those as dependencies for polyml. > > wond

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi James, > > >I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling >all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script requires >gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have added those >as dependencies for polyml. wonderful, I'

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-17 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, > I sponsored the package Thank you again for all your help. > (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is > nice to be subscribed) I have subscribed to debian-science as well. > However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi James, I sponsored the package (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is nice to be subscribed) However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags in a future release: CXXFLAGS missing (-fPIE): LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,now) CFLAGS missing (-

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-15 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, Apologies for the duplicate message, but I forgot to Cc the bug and debian-science. > well, for sure I suggest you to subscribe to debian-devel mail list and to > the package [1] at the bottom of the page. Done (although to the digest for debian-devel!) > you can also contact M

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >I have uploaded the latest version to mentors. Currently, the old maintainers >are still listed in debian/control. I’m happy to assume responsibility for bug >>reports etc, so do I need to add myself to Uploaders? I don’t want to tread >on anyone’s toes though if that’s bad form. well, fo

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-15 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, > On 15 Oct 2015, at 10:56, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > Hi James > > >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. > > > > please call it 5.5.2-1 and nothing more :) > you can push the same version many times on mentors with no problems. Changed >> 1) Do I need to send

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi James >I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. please call it 5.5.2-1 and nothing more :) you can push the same version many times on mentors with no problems. >1) Do I need to send a separate email to this then? I also filed #801793 for a >transition, but that has already been closed as u

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-14 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. 1) Do I need to send a separate email to this then? I also filed #801793 for a transition, but that has already been closed as unnecessary since there are no rdeps. 2) Added 6) The compiler is indeed forcing your code to be linked against

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

2015-10-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi James, >Thank you for continuing to look at this. I have just uploaded the newest >version (5.5.2-1~rc1) to https://mentors.debian.net/package/polyml. thanks to you for caring! >1) I have sent a request to join debian-science. Presumably I should wait >until the package is ready to be upl