On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Would you be able to give any better replacement for the deprecated
> libvte9 which does not require a gtk3 port? Sorry for my very naive
> attempt but I simply have no idea about GTK porting issues.
I am unaware of any such library. The la
Hi Jeremy,
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:03:27PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I see that you pushed a commit to Build-Depend on libvte-2.91-dev. But
> vte2.91 is gtk3 only so this bug is also a request to port rasmol to
> gtk3.
Would you be able to give any better replacement for the deprecated
libv
Andreas,
I see that you pushed a commit to Build-Depend on libvte-2.91-dev. But
vte2.91 is gtk3 only so this bug is also a request to port rasmol to
gtk3.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debia
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Graham,
On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:11:06 +0200 you wrote:
> I'll have a look when I get a chance, possibly at debcamp next month.
I've commited some general packaging changes (short dh would be a nice
thing to have as well but I did not want to fiddle around with this in
a st
Hi,
I had a look into the said issue but failed with
...
No package 'vte' found
Package vte was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `vte.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'vte' found
...
When looking at the upstream pa
