On 23-08-15 19:59, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Thanks, Bas. Agreed and accepted. Will upload in a
> few moments.
Thanks. I'll finish up the new osrm revision to close its RC bug after
libstxxl hits the mirrors.
> Feel free to join debian-science group on Alioth, I will
> accept your request, if you wan
Thanks, Bas. Agreed and accepted. Will upload in a
few moments.
Feel free to join debian-science group on Alioth, I will
accept your request, if you want.
Best regards
Anton
2015-08-23 19:34 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg :
> My proposed changes are attached because cannot push to debian-scie
On 23-08-15 19:15, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 23/08/15 16:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 23-08-15 16:59, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> The "SONAME bump" option was only really meant to be taken if the library
>>> had an upstream SONAME bump pending anyway (for instance icu and boost
>>> went th
On 23/08/15 16:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 23-08-15 16:59, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> The "SONAME bump" option was only really meant to be taken if the library
>> had an upstream SONAME bump pending anyway (for instance icu and boost
>> went this route). If there is not a SONAME change alre
tags 791173 +pending
thanks
Hi Sebastiaan
thanks for you effort, but I have just pushed it already.
Thanks
Anton
2015-08-23 17:10 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg :
> On 23-08-15 16:59, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> The "SONAME bump" option was only really meant to be taken if the library
>> had an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 791173 +pending
Bug #791173 [src:libstxxl] libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC
5 is the default
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
791173: http://bugs.debia
On 23-08-15 16:59, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The "SONAME bump" option was only really meant to be taken if the library
> had an upstream SONAME bump pending anyway (for instance icu and boost
> went this route). If there is not a SONAME change already in the pipeline,
> you should do the "v5" rename
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 18:57:37 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> It looks like libstxxl needs a transition after al.
>
> At least osrm is a reverse dependency, it cannot be built due to
> undefined references to stxxl::print_msg() and others.
Indeed. When I closed the bug with "no rdeps, don
severity 791173 +serious
thanks
Hi,
I am fixing it now. I think just a soname-bump would be
enough.
Cheers
Anton
2015-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00 D Haley :
> Hi All,
>
> Apologies for being late to fix this bug. I had previously looked into it
> and from the above instructions, I had seen the bump
Hi All,
Apologies for being late to fix this bug. I had previously looked into
it and from the above instructions, I had seen the bump was needed, but
have only just had the time to work on this.
I have contacted upstream to see which of the two options they would
prefer. My preference is fo
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #791173 {Done: Simon McVittie } [src:libstxxl] libstxxl:
library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791173 to the same values
previously set
--
791173: http://bugs.debian.
Control: reopen -1
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:03:51 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:12:19 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
> >maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
> >break s
Package: src:libstxxl
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11
Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
Packages which are built
13 matches
Mail list logo
