Bug#811191: [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite

2016-01-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:lapack Version: 3.6.0-2 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch Regressed compared to 3.5.0. According to https://ci.debian.net/packages/l/lapack/unstable/amd64/ lapack fails the lapack-testsuite, but is very terse about what exactly failed: adt-run [11:49:05]: test

Bug#811191: [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite

2016-01-16 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le samedi 16 janvier 2016 à 19:24 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 16.01.2016 18:00, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > I was aware of the failure but decided to nevertheless add  that >  > testsuite as an autopkgtest, in order to make the test failures > more visible. > > I'll never understand

Bug#811191: [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite

2016-01-16 Thread Matthias Klose
On 16.01.2016 18:00, Sébastien Villemot wrote: I was aware of the failure but decided to nevertheless add that > testsuite as an autopkgtest, in order to make the test failures more visible. I'll never understand why people do that ... once Debian adds succeeding autopkg tests as a

Processed: Re: Bug#811191: [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite

2016-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #811191 [src:lapack] [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > retitle -1 some test fails in LAPACK testsuite Bug #811191 [src:lapack] [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite Chang

Bug#811191: [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite

2016-01-16 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Control: severity -1 normal Control: retitle -1 some test fails in LAPACK testsuite Le samedi 16 janvier 2016 à 17:29 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : > Package: src:lapack > Version: 3.6.0-2 > Severity: important > Tags: sid stretch > > Regressed compared to 3.5.0. > > According to >