Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, just a warning for those who have asked for fixing all tests on all architectures: If I get no answer to the problems their prefered solution to the current situation is creating for me who seems the only one who is concerned about getting lots of packages kicked from testing I'll fall back

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:03:49PM +0100, James Clarke wrote: > On 16 Oct 2017, at 11:08, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:21:46PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > >>> raise nose.SkipTest("known failure of test_stata on non-little > >>> endian")

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-16 Thread James Clarke
On 16 Oct 2017, at 11:08, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:21:46PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: >>> raise nose.SkipTest("known failure of test_stata on non-little endian") >>> E NameError: name 'nose' is not defined >> >> You need an 'import nose'

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:21:46PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > raise nose.SkipTest("known failure of test_stata on non-little endian") > > E NameError: name 'nose' is not defined > > You need an 'import nose' first, if the test doesn't already have one. If the 'import nose' is

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
raise nose.SkipTest("known failure of test_stata on non-little endian") E NameError: name 'nose' is not defined You need an 'import nose' first, if the test doesn't already have one. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, for arm64 the method I uploaded has seemed to work but for mips and s390x it ends up in ... ERRORS ERROR collecting debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/tests/io/test_stata.py

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yaroslav, thanks for those hints that somehow came to late since I just read it after I implemented some hopefully working solution. I just uploaded and we'll see what might happen. Every reader here is invited to fix it if not / enhance it if not happy. :-) Kind regards Andreas. On

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-14 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 14/10/17 07:54, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 08:00:36PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > ... > > pandas_datareader: None > > usage: pytest.py [options] [file_or_dir] [file_or_dir] [...] > > pytest.py: error: unrecognized

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-14 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 14/10/17 07:54, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 08:00:36PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: I might try to pick some of the failed tests from the logs. I did so once with kind of iterative uploads for python-cogent package by checking the logs of the failing architectures. If you

Bug#877419: [Help] Exclusion did not worked (Was: Bug#877419: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] ...)

2017-10-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 08:00:36PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I might try to pick some of the failed tests from the logs. I did so > once with kind of iterative uploads for python-cogent package by > checking the logs of the failing architectures. If you think the proper > way would be to