On 06/03/2016 10:55 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 06/03/2016 10:07 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that
>>> PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once
Hi-
I'm not that familiar with the Debian side of things
but am standing up a Debian system this weekend and
hoping to take a look at updating the previous work
by Henning Glawe. If you have any PDL specific questions,
please feel free to email me directly.
--Chris
(PDL-2.016 release manager)
On 06/03/2016 10:07 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that
>> PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once did some
>> ad-hoc fixes Upstream CCed me whether I could
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Perl team,
>
> I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that
> PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once did some
> ad-hoc fixes Upstream CCed me whether I could do something as Debian
> S
We've just released PDL-2.016.
https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/mailman/message/35124607/
--Chris
On 5/30/2016 06:02, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Perl team,
I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that
PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once did some
ad
Hi Perl team,
I've got a request from PDL upstream who fully correctly noticed that
PDL is not properly maintained inside Debian. Since I once did some
ad-hoc fixes Upstream CCed me whether I could do something as Debian
Science team member. I had a look and updated Git[1] a bit but I
noticed th
