Can we talk
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Can we talk
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:33:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#852007: fixed in flint 2.5.2-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #852007,
regarding flint: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: src:flint
Version: 2.5.2-14
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-5, gcc-5-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g
Your message dated Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:00:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#819339: fixed in qd 2.3.17.dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #819339,
regarding qd: Rename library packages for g++5 ABI transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:55:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835953: fixed in yosys 0.6-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #835953,
regarding yosys: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: yosys
Version: 0.6-6
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-5, gcc-5-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g++, or
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:52:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#797718: fixed in flann 1.9.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #797718,
regarding flann: transition may be needed for g++-5 ABIs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#797649: fixed in dxflib 2.5.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #797649,
regarding dxflib: transition needed for g++-5 ABIs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
; > Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
> > C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
> > Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one
> > from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries bu
ps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
> Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one
> from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from
> this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols,
> dropping other symbols. If the
Processing control commands:
> unblock -1 by 791067
Bug #797718 [src:flann] flann: transition may be needed for g++-5 ABIs
797718 was blocked by: 791067
797718 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 797718: 791067
--
797718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797
Your message dated Sat, 5 Sep 2015 08:42:44 +0100
with message-id <20150905074244.ge3...@rano.org>
and subject line Re: libcolpack0v5: built with g++-4.9 on arm64 and sparc64
has caused the Debian Bug report #797758,
regarding libcolpack0v5: built with g++-4.9 on arm64 and sparc64
to be mar
arm64 was caused by this:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=shogun&suite=sid
On arm64 this happened because arm-arm-03 failed to regenerate its
chroot on Aug 2; a binNMU would presumably make the problem go away.
But perhaps you'd prefer to update the source to make sure tha
Source: flann
Version: 1.8.4-4.1
Severity: important
Control: block -1 by 791067
Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one
from testing
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 791067
Bug #797718 [src:flann] flann: transition may be needed for g++-5 ABIs
797718 was not blocked by any bugs.
797718 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 797718: 791067
--
797718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Source: dxflib
Version: 2.5.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: potentially breaks reverse-dependencies
Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental
Control: reopen -1
Control: found -1 3.1-5+b2
Control: fixed -1 1.4~rc2-2
It looks like there was a regression and mpich started to pass compiler
options via mpicxx.mpich again:
$ mpicxx.mpich -show
g++ -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security
-Wl,-z,relro -I/usr
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #624349 {Done: Torquil Macdonald Sørensen }
[libmpich2-dev] libmpich2-dev: Activates debugging compiler option -g
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may n
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:50:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751310: fixed in feel++ 1:0.98.0-final-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #751310,
regarding feel++: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.8)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:48:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751317: fixed in gringo 4.3.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #751317,
regarding gringo: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.8)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: gringo
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid jessie
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-4.7, gcc-4.7-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g
gcc/g++, or
with gcc-4.9/g++-4.9.
Please drop build dependencies of the form libstdc++6-4.7-dev, these
are not needed and fulfilled by build-essential.
Please keep this report open until the package uses the default
compiler version (or gcc-4.9) for the package build.
The severity of this report
Your message dated Sun, 18 May 2014 12:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#747999: fixed in fplll 4.0.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #747999,
regarding fplll: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.7)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: fplll
Version: 4.0.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid jessie
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-4.7, gcc-4.7-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g
25 matches
Mail list logo
