Re: Bug#845348: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Daniele, thanks for the quick response. On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:34:26PM +0100, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote: > On 2016-11-24 08:24, Andreas Tille wrote: > >I'll checkout gtkdataboxmm myself since I was once sponsering this - no > >idea whether Daniele remains active on this package. > >

Re: Bug#845348: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-24 Thread Daniele E. Domenichelli
On 2016-11-24 08:24, Andreas Tille wrote: I'll checkout gtkdataboxmm myself since I was once sponsering this - no idea whether Daniele remains active on this package. I haven't used gtkdataboxmm for a long time now, and I'm no longer developing it upstream. I think that, unless someone wants

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-24 Thread peter green
On 24/11/16 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote: The other problem is that libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev should not be any more in the pool at all and I have no idea why this is the case. Binary packages that are no longer built by a source package are not removed instantly, they will be cleaned up by

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2016-11-24 9:04, Andreas Tille wrote: The other problem is that libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev should not be any more in the pool at all and I have no idea why this is the case. As with almost every other transition, it's still in the archive because other packages in the archive still

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Adrian, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:27:18AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > I'm now realising that the first option has installable candidates which > > is astonishing since I assumed that with a new source package upload the > > binaries created by the previous version would vanish from the

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:40:43AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi again, > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote: > > > > brp-pacu: has a build-dependency on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev | > > libgtkdatabox-dev . Unfortunately buildds only look at the first option > > I'm

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Andreas Tille] >> xoscope: build-depends on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev explicitly I'll take care of this one, if the maintainer do not fix it quickly. I just submitted a patch to BTS solving the build problem by changing libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev go libgtkdatabox-dev. Thank you for the warning.

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote: > > brp-pacu: has a build-dependency on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev | > libgtkdatabox-dev . Unfortunately buildds only look at the first option I'm now realising that the first option has installable candidates which is

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Peter, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote: > As a derivative maintainer I noticed that there appears to be a gtkdatabox > transition going on. Looking at the list archives for debian-release I see > no mention of it on there. That might have been a race condition

What is going on with gtkdatabox?

2016-11-23 Thread peter green
As a derivative maintainer I noticed that there appears to be a gtkdatabox transition going on. Looking at the list archives for debian-release I see no mention of it on there. Specifically it seems that the libgtkdatabox source package has renamed every binary package it generates.