Re: r-cran-drr_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-11-28 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Andreas, On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: Fixed in new upload. great, ... and accepted. I remember times when this kind of minor issues were part of an "accepted" mail since you trusted the maintainer to fix the issue in the next issue. Was anything wrong with this approach?

Re: r-cran-drr_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-11-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thorsten, On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 04:00:10PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > please remove the term "or (at your option) any later version" from the GPL-3 > license block. Fixed in new upload. I remember times when this kind of minor issues were part of an "accepted" mail since you

r-cran-drr_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-11-23 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Andreas, please remove the term "or (at your option) any later version" from the GPL-3 license block. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

Re: r-cran-drr_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-11-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thorsten, On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:00:11PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > according to DESCRIPTION the license is only GPL-3. Fixed in new upload. Thanks for your work as ftpmaster Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

r-cran-drr_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-11-21 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Andreas, according to DESCRIPTION the license is only GPL-3. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list