statsmodels 0.8.0-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-01-26
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
866446: openpyxl: depends on obsolete python-imaging (replace with python3-pil
or python-pil)
884294: pandas: pandas FTBFS: test failure
--
debian-science-maintainers
statsmodels 0.8.0-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-01-26
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
884294: pandas: pandas FTBFS: test failure
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
statsmodels 0.8.0-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-12-13
It is affected by these RC bugs:
880245: statsmodels: FTBFS: RuntimeError: Kernel died before replying to
kernel_info
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
statsmodels 0.8.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-10-28
It is affected by these RC bugs:
873512: statsmodels: statsmodels FTBFS with Cython 0.26
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
875723: python3-pandas: Pandas is not installable
--
debian-science-maintainers
statsmodels 0.8.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-10-11
It is affected by these RC bugs:
873512: statsmodels: statsmodels FTBFS with Cython 0.26
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
867406: jdcal: python-jdcal/python3-jdcal: missing dependencies
872314: pytables:
statsmodels 0.8.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-10-11
It is affected by these RC bugs:
873512: statsmodels: statsmodels FTBFS with Cython 0.26
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On August 16, 2017 8:11:50 PM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi Yaroslav,
>
>> apparently it is a problem in recent pandas, which isn't yet resolved
>or
>> worked around in statsmodels
>>
>https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/issues/3841#issuecomment-318630239
>> so we might
Hi Yaroslav,
> apparently it is a problem in recent pandas, which isn't yet resolved or
> worked around in statsmodels
> https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/issues/3841#issuecomment-318630239
> so we might just need to wait a bit more
I've checked the Gitlab issue but I have no idea what
statsmodels 0.8.0~rc1+git59-gef47cd9-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing
on 2017-09-01
It is affected by these RC bugs:
868977: statsmodels: FTBFS: TypeError: data type not understood
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
statsmodels 0.8.0~rc1+git59-gef47cd9-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing
on 2017-09-01
It is affected by these RC bugs:
868977: statsmodels: FTBFS: TypeError: data type not understood
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
statsmodels 0.8.0~rc1+git59-gef47cd9-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing
on 2017-04-26
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
857067: dsdp: dsdp FTBFS on s390x: Build killed with signal TERM after 150
minutes of inactivity
858260: pandas: FTBFS
statsmodels 0.8.0~rc1+git43-g1ac3f11-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing
on 2017-01-29
It is affected by these RC bugs:
841610: statsmodels: FTBFS: TypeError: cannot sort an Index object in-place,
use sort_values instead
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
848771: numexpr:
12 matches
Mail list logo