Re: vtk6 and #773424

2015-12-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I have commited the libvtk6-java enabled packaging to Git. I'd volunteer to upload this to unstable and test with the packaging I have in mind that depends from libvtk6-java. I would consider to unarchive and reopen #773422 and try to sort out the things with the help of the Debian Java team

Bug#773422: vtk6 and #773424

2015-01-17 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Andrea, sure, if there is an interest in this kind of vtk-binding, we can try to recover it, providing autopkgtest to be sure in a functionality of this part of the library. Feel free to open a wishlist-bug with the hope to find a volunteer for that. Debain-java team was not asked for the cons

Re: vtk6 and #773424

2015-01-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Anton, besides this I wonder whether we could / should / are able to get libvtk6-java back since the removal in #773422 was no solution everybody is happy about. Did you tried consulting debian-java list (and if not would you be interested if somebody else would try?) I'm tempted to reopen th

Re: vtk6 and #773424

2015-01-13 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Gert, unblock request was filed already #774646. Need to wait for release-team decision. Cheers Anton 2015-01-13 12:05 GMT+01:00 Gert Wollny : > Hi all, > > since #773424 was an RC bug that would result in the removal of vtk6 and > various other packages from jessie, shouldn't someone reque

vtk6 and #773424

2015-01-13 Thread Gert Wollny
Hi all, since #773424 was an RC bug that would result in the removal of vtk6 and various other packages from jessie, shouldn't someone request an unblock of the latest upload that closed this bug so that it can migrate? many thanks, Gert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signe