libc 2.0.x versions are in slink, in potato this is upgraded to 2.1.x
versions, so you won't be able to use libsafe with slink because the libc6
version is to early. The newer libc6 versions won't be uploaded to slink,
you'll have to upgrade to potato (or create a slink system with a lot
potato, bu
Ron
Ron Rademaker wrote:
>
> I've packages libsafe_1.3-1_i386.deb earlier this week, I don't know if
> you downloaded that version?
Yes, tried to install it and the --install script came back with...
"dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libsafe: Libsafe
depends on libc6 (>=2.12)
I've packages libsafe_1.3-1_i386.deb earlier this week, I don't know if
you downloaded that version? If you got it from rademaker.dhs.org, you got
that version... As long as you are using an ldso version that is higher
then the one it depends on, it shouldn't be a problem, I would advice you
to ins
Tollef,
There are other security bugs that 2.2.16 fixes, y'know.
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a--- C UL P L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w
O--- M- V- PS+ PE- Y PGP t+ 5 X- R tv
libc 2.0.x versions are in slink, in potato this is upgraded to 2.1.x
versions, so you won't be able to use libsafe with slink because the libc6
version is to early. The newer libc6 versions won't be uploaded to slink,
you'll have to upgrade to potato (or create a slink system with a lot
potato, b
Ron
Ron Rademaker wrote:
>
> I've packages libsafe_1.3-1_i386.deb earlier this week, I don't know if
> you downloaded that version?
Yes, tried to install it and the --install script came back with...
"dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libsafe: Libsafe
depends on libc6 (>=2.12
Dear All
I've been able to find and download libsafe_1.3-1_i386.deb
Before I install it does anyone know of any issues with libsafe and
Debian 2.1 ?? Will it just install without problems or do I need to
alter a few config files ??
Thank you
--
Richard
Sheffield Linux
User's Group
http://ww
I've packages libsafe_1.3-1_i386.deb earlier this week, I don't know if
you downloaded that version? If you got it from rademaker.dhs.org, you got
that version... As long as you are using an ldso version that is higher
then the one it depends on, it shouldn't be a problem, I would advice you
to in
* =?iso-8859-15?Q?Jean-Philippe_Gu=E9rard?=
| It seems that both a new kernel version (2.2.16), and a new version
| of sendmail have been released to fix a very serious security bug.
|
| See http://www.sendmail.org/sendmail.8.10.1.LINUX-SECURITY.txt>
|
| Shouldn't both sendmail and the current
It seems that both a new kernel version (2.2.16), and a new version
of sendmail have been released to fix a very serious security bug.
See http://www.sendmail.org/sendmail.8.10.1.LINUX-SECURITY.txt
Shouldn't both sendmail and the current kernel be updated ASAP ?
Also :
-
Tollef,
There are other security bugs that 2.2.16 fixes, y'know.
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a--- C UL P L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w
O--- M- V- PS+ PE- Y PGP t+ 5 X- R t
Dear All
I've been able to find and download libsafe_1.3-1_i386.deb
Before I install it does anyone know of any issues with libsafe and
Debian 2.1 ?? Will it just install without problems or do I need to
alter a few config files ??
Thank you
--
Richard
Sheffield Linux
User's Group
http://w
* =?iso-8859-15?Q?Jean-Philippe_Gu=E9rard?=
| It seems that both a new kernel version (2.2.16), and a new version
| of sendmail have been released to fix a very serious security bug.
|
| See http://www.sendmail.org/sendmail.8.10.1.LINUX-SECURITY.txt>
|
| Shouldn't both sendmail and the current
It seems that both a new kernel version (2.2.16), and a new version
of sendmail have been released to fix a very serious security bug.
See http://www.sendmail.org/sendmail.8.10.1.LINUX-SECURITY.txt
Shouldn't both sendmail and the current kernel be updated ASAP ?
Also :
14 matches
Mail list logo
