Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

hi christopher... anytime someone has physical access to the machine... you already have a security problem ( my definition ) i am not sure that you can get physical access as root from the options shown in /etc/auto.misc but if oyu are correctwow...wonder how many people tried it...

Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

hi christopher... anytime someone has physical access to the machine... you already have a security problem ( my definition ) i am not sure that you can get physical access as root from the options shown in /etc/auto.misc but if oyu are correctwow...wonder how many people tried it..

Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

severity 66556 normal thanks On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Christopher W. Curtis wrote: [ snipped 'sploit ] I do not consider this a problem. If you have console access to a machine, you can do much more damage than creating trojan floppys. Please search the list archives for discussions about mbr, and

SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

I'm obviously doing something wrong ... I've written to the maintainer of the autofs package according to the page summary listed under 'packages' from the website, and as I also saw somewhere else (dpkg -s listing?). I filed a bug report against autofs and marked it as release critical. I have

Re: SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

severity 66556 normal thanks On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Christopher W. Curtis wrote: [ snipped 'sploit ] I do not consider this a problem. If you have console access to a machine, you can do much more damage than creating trojan floppys. Please search the list archives for discussions about mbr, an

SECURITY PROBLEM: autofs [all versions]

I'm obviously doing something wrong ... I've written to the maintainer of the autofs package according to the page summary listed under 'packages' from the website, and as I also saw somewhere else (dpkg -s listing?). I filed a bug report against autofs and marked it as release critical. I have