Marco Giardini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> after all the reading on nterm, i've found on my server (using nmap)
> that the following port are open:
>
> 736
> 751
> 745
>
> since no kerberos is installed, i'd like to know what are the
> services on these ports and how to remove them.
Do a `net
Marco Giardini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> after all the reading on nterm, i've found on my server (using nmap)
> that the following port are open:
>
> 736
> 751
> 745
>
> since no kerberos is installed, i'd like to know what are the
> services on these ports and how to remove them.
Do a `ne
... what a mess!
> This does indeed make things clear.
> Thank you, a lot...
This was referred to the explanations, of course.
Thanks!
Sergio
This does indeed make things clear.
Thank you, a lot...
Sorry Paul, I believe I misunderstood you because of ... of your
"hey - stop that", which I understood as the subject of your mail
rather than your (ambiguous) no-spam trick. It's ok ;-)
I feel better now.
Sergio
Okay , maybe that was a lame way to put it, but i did indeed mean that what
nmap tells you is not authorative and we already determined that it was not
about nterm (whatever that is) anyway.
/paul
(xcuse the no-history, blame
'mail':)
after all the reading on nterm, i've found on my server (using nmap)
that the following port are open:
736
751
745
since no kerberos is installed, i'd like to know what are the
services on these ports and how to remove them.
Thanks
.oesse.
--
---
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 06:02:14PM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> >actually i dont think it is really relevant what nterm really is, cos
> >that is just something nmap came up with.
>
> It is relevant because it is a tcp service that I may NOT want to
> give or use, because it is running on my
>nterm (no terminal) is a meta-package that doesnt install any
>terminalemulator. this is the default for most installs
>
>actually i dont think it is really relevant what nterm really is, cos
>that is just something nmap came up with.
>
>/paul
It is relevant because it is a tcp service that I m
nterm (no terminal) is a meta-package that doesnt install any terminalemulator.
this is the default for most installs
actually i dont think it is really relevant what nterm really is, cos that is
just something nmap came up with.
/paul
>> Could you please tell me the name of the package that nterm belongs to?
>None. It is probably even no linux program. It is mentioned at:
> http://www.sdesign.com/securitytest/portlist.html
So, where does nterm come from?
Sergio
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:11:15PM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> >nterm: is totally wrong as it has nothing to do with gnome and is just
> >another
> > programm that listens on this port on some machines.
> > (the term was found in some /etc/services)
> Could you please tell me the
> BTW, I forwarded your bug to gnome-devel-list.
Well done. Thanks.
Sergio
>nterm: is totally wrong as it has nothing to do with gnome and is just another
> programm that listens on this port on some machines.
> (the term was found in some /etc/services)
Could you please tell me the name of the package that nterm belongs to?
Sergio
... what a mess!
> This does indeed make things clear.
> Thank you, a lot...
This was referred to the explanations, of course.
Thanks!
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This does indeed make things clear.
Thank you, a lot...
Sorry Paul, I believe I misunderstood you because of ... of your
"hey - stop that", which I understood as the subject of your mail
rather than your (ambiguous) no-spam trick. It's ok ;-)
I feel better now.
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Okay , maybe that was a lame way to put it, but i did indeed mean that what nmap tells
you is not authorative and we already determined that it was not about nterm (whatever
that is) anyway.
/paul
(xcuse the no-history, blame
'mail':)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
after all the reading on nterm, i've found on my server (using nmap)
that the following port are open:
736
751
745
since no kerberos is installed, i'd like to know what are the
services on these ports and how to remove them.
Thanks
.oesse.
--
--
"CH" == Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
CH> Argh :-) Your're all still looking for the wrong thing:
CH> nterm: is totally wrong as it has nothing to do with gnome and is just
another
CH>programm that listens on this port on some machines.
CH>(the term wa
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:53:37PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> I find nothing in the latest (0.5.4) orbit source tree with rgrep
> {nterm,1026} *
Argh :-) Your're all still looking for the wrong thing:
nterm: is totally wrong as it has nothing to do with gnome and is just another
pr
Hi,
just want to report that the update
php3 3.0.16-2potato -> 3.0.17-0potato2 breaks my webmailer
(package imp 2.2.3)
Well, it does not break imp completely, only sending
attachments with the webmail interface fails
(apache-ssl error.log reports a segfault).
The flaw disappears when downgradin
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 06:02:14PM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> >actually i dont think it is really relevant what nterm really is, cos
> >that is just something nmap came up with.
>
> It is relevant because it is a tcp service that I may NOT want to
> give or use, because it is running on my
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I suspect it's determined more by the corba layer, or something of that
>> ilk, at startup-time. It would be more to the point if you did
>> $ sudo netstat -pant | grep LIST | grep -Ei 'gnome|session'
>>
>> I think it's something Sergio
>nterm (no terminal) is a meta-package that doesnt install any
>terminalemulator. this is the default for most installs
>
>actually i dont think it is really relevant what nterm really is, cos
>that is just something nmap came up with.
>
>/paul
It is relevant because it is a tcp service that I
nterm (no terminal) is a meta-package that doesnt install any terminalemulator.
this is the default for most installs
actually i dont think it is really relevant what nterm really is, cos that is just
something nmap came up with.
/paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
>> Could you please tell me the name of the package that nterm belongs to?
>None. It is probably even no linux program. It is mentioned at:
> http://www.sdesign.com/securitytest/portlist.html
So, where does nterm come from?
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:11:15PM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> >nterm: is totally wrong as it has nothing to do with gnome and is just another
> > programm that listens on this port on some machines.
> > (the term was found in some /etc/services)
> Could you please tell me the nam
> BTW, I forwarded your bug to gnome-devel-list.
Well done. Thanks.
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>nterm: is totally wrong as it has nothing to do with gnome and is just another
> programm that listens on this port on some machines.
> (the term was found in some /etc/services)
Could you please tell me the name of the package that nterm belongs to?
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
"CH" == Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
CH> Argh :-) Your're all still looking for the wrong thing:
CH> nterm: is totally wrong as it has nothing to do with gnome and is just another
CH>programm that listens on this port on some machines.
CH>(the term wa
>I suspect it's determined more by the corba layer, or something of that
>ilk, at startup-time. It would be more to the point if you did
> $ sudo netstat -pant | grep LIST | grep -Ei 'gnome|session'
>
>I think it's something Sergio's running as part of gnome-session, if not
>the session its
>If it's configurable, it should default to Off. (Like it does here,
>somehow, really.)
I agree.
> gnome-session 1.2.2.1-3 from woody
I am running gnome-session 1.0.55-2 from woody on a ppc.
Chances are that it is default to off in this later release.
Sergio
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:53:37PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> I find nothing in the latest (0.5.4) orbit source tree with rgrep {nterm,1026} *
Argh :-) Your're all still looking for the wrong thing:
nterm: is totally wrong as it has nothing to do with gnome and is just another
prog
Hi,
just want to report that the update
php3 3.0.16-2potato -> 3.0.17-0potato2 breaks my webmailer
(package imp 2.2.3)
Well, it does not break imp completely, only sending
attachments with the webmail interface fails
(apache-ssl error.log reports a segfault).
The flaw disappears when downgradi
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I suspect it's determined more by the corba layer, or something of that
>> ilk, at startup-time. It would be more to the point if you did
>> $ sudo netstat -pant | grep LIST | grep -Ei 'gnome|session'
>>
>> I think it's something Sergi
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SB> Christian,
>
> SB> I see that you do not have any service in port 1026.
> SB> Are you running GNOME at all?
>
> I did "rgrep -w nterm *" and "rgrep -w 1026 *" in gnome-libs and g
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Great. So, you are running GNOME, but you have no nterm service
SB> and gnome-session listening to it. And you are running Debian
SB> (potato/woody?). Please report the version of gnome-session
SB> installed on your system too. Did y
Great. So, you are running GNOME, but you have no nterm service
and gnome-session listening to it. And you are running Debian
(potato/woody?). Please report the version of gnome-session
installed on your system too. Did you do anything to avoid
this, or it comes straight out of the box? The
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Christian,
SB> I see that you do not have any service in port 1026.
SB> Are you running GNOME at all?
I did "rgrep -w nterm *" and "rgrep -w 1026 *" in gnome-libs and gnome-core
source tree and I find nothing.
Christian
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Christian,
SB> I see that you do not have any service in port 1026.
SB> Are you running GNOME at all?
Yes of course.
Christian
Christian,
I see that you do not have any service in port 1026.
Are you running GNOME at all?
Sergio
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Please post the result of the following command, as root:
--> nmap your.machine.name
SB> Do not post the machine name and IP; just the result.
SB> nmap is a Debian package, but you can also grab it from
SB> www.insecure.org/nmap
(
Please post the result of the following command, as root:
--> nmap your.machine.name
Do not post the machine name and IP; just the result.
nmap is a Debian package, but you can also grab it from
www.insecure.org/nmap
Sergio
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I can reproduce this bug.
>>
>> $ sudo netstat -np | egrep 1026
>>
>> Nothing.
SB> You mean you can -not- reproduce it.
yes
SB> Try "netstat -anp | egrep 1026" as root.
SB> Please follow the discussion on debian-security.
The sam
>I can reproduce this bug.
>
>$ sudo netstat -np | egrep 1026
>
>Nothing.
You mean you can -not- reproduce it.
Try "netstat -anp | egrep 1026" as root.
Please follow the discussion on debian-security.
Sergio
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Package: gnome-session
SB> Version: all versions
SB> Severity: grave
SB> -- Description of Bug
SB> GNOME-SESSION makes available the "nterm" tcp/ip service in port 1026:
--> netstat -anp | egrep 1026
SB> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:10
>> This is a little confusing. I have that nterm is the name of the
>> service in port 1026, and I have gnome-session listening to it.
>
>Ports above 1024 are free for any user program like gnome-session to use.
>It's nothing to do with any nterm service. If you had an nterm service it
>would
Hello
[I Cc'ed the maintainer of gnome-session.]
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Colin Phipps wrote:
> As to why it listens on all interfaces, pass, probably it needs to so gnome
> apps running on different machines can communicate.
>
> #include
We should made *this* configurable by
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> This is a little confusing. I have that nterm is the name of the
> service in port 1026, and I have gnome-session listening to it.
Ports above 1024 are free for any user program like gnome-session to use.
It's nothing to do wit
>But was there an explanation why gnome-session has to listen on every IP
>and not only on 127.0.0.1?
No, there is no doc -a-t- -a-l-l-. It's scary!
Hallo
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:55:55AM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> --> netstat -anp | egrep 1026
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:10260.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> 295/gnome-session
But was there an explanation why gnome-session has to listen on every IP
and not only on 1
Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a little confusing. I have that nterm is the name of the service
> in port 1026, and I have gnome-session listening to it.
>
> I looked for manuals, docs and all sort of infos on the local system,
> including searching content on /etc. I c
... what is worse is that I do not manage to get rid of it.
Sergio
This is a little confusing. I have that nterm is the name of the
service in port 1026, and I have gnome-session listening to it.
I looked for manuals, docs and all sort of infos on the local system,
including searching content on /etc. I could not find anything on
nterm & gnome-session & po
Previously Sergio Brandano wrote:
> ... by the way, what is nterm? there are no docs on that too.
A quick search (10 second) on google reveals that is might be a nroff
based printing service, used on AIX at least.
Wichert.
--
... by the way, what is nterm? there are no docs on that too.
Too bad there are no docs on it.
>It has nothing to do with nterm, and it's just session management. This
>has been discussed in various fora several times now.
>I suspect it's determined more by the corba layer, or something of that
>ilk, at startup-time. It would be more to the point if you did
> $ sudo netstat -pant | grep LIST | grep -Ei 'gnome|session'
>
>I think it's something Sergio's running as part of gnome-session, if not
>the session it
Previously Sergio Brandano wrote:
> There is no documentation on the nterm service, including its purpose
> and security issues. I first reported the fact at the genesis of the
> GNOME project, about two years ago. I hope this time there will be
> a public answer.
It has nothing to do with nte
>If it's configurable, it should default to Off. (Like it does here,
>somehow, really.)
I agree.
> gnome-session 1.2.2.1-3 from woody
I am running gnome-session 1.0.55-2 from woody on a ppc.
Chances are that it is default to off in this later release.
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: gnome-session
Version: all versions
Severity: grave
-- Description of Bug
GNOME-SESSION makes available the "nterm" tcp/ip service in port 1026:
--> netstat -anp | egrep 1026
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:10260.0.0.0:* LISTEN
295/gnome-session
There is
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SB> Christian,
>
> SB> I see that you do not have any service in port 1026.
> SB> Are you running GNOME at all?
>
> I did "rgrep -w nterm *" and "rgrep -w 1026 *" in gnome-libs and
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Great. So, you are running GNOME, but you have no nterm service
SB> and gnome-session listening to it. And you are running Debian
SB> (potato/woody?). Please report the version of gnome-session
SB> installed on your system too. Did
Great. So, you are running GNOME, but you have no nterm service
and gnome-session listening to it. And you are running Debian
(potato/woody?). Please report the version of gnome-session
installed on your system too. Did you do anything to avoid
this, or it comes straight out of the box? The
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Christian,
SB> I see that you do not have any service in port 1026.
SB> Are you running GNOME at all?
I did "rgrep -w nterm *" and "rgrep -w 1026 *" in gnome-libs and gnome-core
source tree and I find nothing.
Christian
--
To
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Christian,
SB> I see that you do not have any service in port 1026.
SB> Are you running GNOME at all?
Yes of course.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Christian,
I see that you do not have any service in port 1026.
Are you running GNOME at all?
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Please post the result of the following command, as root:
--> nmap your.machine.name
SB> Do not post the machine name and IP; just the result.
SB> nmap is a Debian package, but you can also grab it from
SB> www.insecure.org/nmap
Please post the result of the following command, as root:
--> nmap your.machine.name
Do not post the machine name and IP; just the result.
nmap is a Debian package, but you can also grab it from
www.insecure.org/nmap
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I can reproduce this bug.
>>
>> $ sudo netstat -np | egrep 1026
>>
>> Nothing.
SB> You mean you can -not- reproduce it.
yes
SB> Try "netstat -anp | egrep 1026" as root.
SB> Please follow the discussion on debian-security.
The sa
>I can reproduce this bug.
>
>$ sudo netstat -np | egrep 1026
>
>Nothing.
You mean you can -not- reproduce it.
Try "netstat -anp | egrep 1026" as root.
Please follow the discussion on debian-security.
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Package: gnome-session
SB> Version: all versions
SB> Severity: grave
SB> -- Description of Bug
SB> GNOME-SESSION makes available the "nterm" tcp/ip service in port 1026:
--> netstat -anp | egrep 1026
SB> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:1
>> This is a little confusing. I have that nterm is the name of the
>> service in port 1026, and I have gnome-session listening to it.
>
>Ports above 1024 are free for any user program like gnome-session to use.
>It's nothing to do with any nterm service. If you had an nterm service it
>woul
Hello
[I Cc'ed the maintainer of gnome-session.]
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Colin Phipps wrote:
> As to why it listens on all interfaces, pass, probably it needs to so gnome
> apps running on different machines can communicate.
>
> #include
We should made *this* configurable by
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> This is a little confusing. I have that nterm is the name of the
> service in port 1026, and I have gnome-session listening to it.
Ports above 1024 are free for any user program like gnome-session to use.
It's nothing to do wi
>But was there an explanation why gnome-session has to listen on every IP
>and not only on 127.0.0.1?
No, there is no doc -a-t- -a-l-l-. It's scary!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:55:55AM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> --> netstat -anp | egrep 1026
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:10260.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>295/gnome-session
But was there an explanation why gnome-session has to listen on every IP
and not only on 1
Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a little confusing. I have that nterm is the name of the service
> in port 1026, and I have gnome-session listening to it.
>
> I looked for manuals, docs and all sort of infos on the local system,
> including searching content on /etc. I
... what is worse is that I do not manage to get rid of it.
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a little confusing. I have that nterm is the name of the
service in port 1026, and I have gnome-session listening to it.
I looked for manuals, docs and all sort of infos on the local system,
including searching content on /etc. I could not find anything on
nterm & gnome-session & p
Previously Sergio Brandano wrote:
> ... by the way, what is nterm? there are no docs on that too.
A quick search (10 second) on google reveals that is might be a nroff
based printing service, used on AIX at least.
Wichert.
--
... by the way, what is nterm? there are no docs on that too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Too bad there are no docs on it.
>It has nothing to do with nterm, and it's just session management. This
>has been discussed in various fora several times now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Sergio Brandano wrote:
> There is no documentation on the nterm service, including its purpose
> and security issues. I first reported the fact at the genesis of the
> GNOME project, about two years ago. I hope this time there will be
> a public answer.
It has nothing to do with nt
Package: gnome-session
Version: all versions
Severity: grave
-- Description of Bug
GNOME-SESSION makes available the "nterm" tcp/ip service in port 1026:
--> netstat -anp | egrep 1026
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:10260.0.0.0:* LISTEN
295/gnome-session
There i
84 matches
Mail list logo
