on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:07:51PM -0400, Peter Cordes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:58:06AM -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
<...>
> Don't even bother with telnet, it's obsolete. Install sshd on any
> machines that don't have it yet, and don't install telnet on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, John Galt wrote:
JG>On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Dan Hutchinson wrote:
JG>
JG>>Has anyone implemented NSA's Secure-Enhanced Linux or has done any work
JG>>with it? NSA states it just adds Mandatory Access Controls. Does this
JG>>help pr
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:39:39PM -0800, William R. Ward wrote:
> date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
> date | Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
> I'm worried that the "date" entries are a consequence of
> some h
Mike Dresser writes:
>"William R. Ward" wrote:
>
>> I've replaced the legit usernames and IP's with "xxx" but left them in
>> for context. I'm worried that the "date" entries are a consequence of
>> some hacker activity, but I have been unable to find any other
>> symptoms. I did a web search and
"William R. Ward" wrote:
> I've replaced the legit usernames and IP's with "xxx" but left them in
> for context. I'm worried that the "date" entries are a consequence of
> some hacker activity, but I have been unable to find any other
> symptoms. I did a web search and did not find any mention o
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:40:01PM -0800, William R. Ward wrote:
> xx pts/3xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Wed Mar 21 14:17 still logged in
> date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
> date | Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
On 2001-03-21, William R. Ward wrote:
>My wtmp file seems to have some rather strange entries...
>
>xx pts/3xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Wed Mar 21 14:17 still logged in
>date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
>date | Wed Mar 2
My wtmp file seems to have some rather strange entries...
xx pts/3xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Wed Mar 21 14:17 still logged in
date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
date | Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, John Galt wrote:
JG>On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Dan Hutchinson wrote:
JG>
JG>>Has anyone implemented NSA's Secure-Enhanced Linux or has done any work
JG>>with it? NSA states it just adds Mandatory Access Controls. Does this
JG>>help p
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:39:39PM -0800, William R. Ward wrote:
> date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
> date | Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
> I'm worried that the "date" entries are a consequence of
> some
Mike Dresser writes:
>"William R. Ward" wrote:
>
>> I've replaced the legit usernames and IP's with "xxx" but left them in
>> for context. I'm worried that the "date" entries are a consequence of
>> some hacker activity, but I have been unable to find any other
>> symptoms. I did a web search an
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Dan Hutchinson wrote:
>Has anyone implemented NSA's Secure-Enhanced Linux or has done any work
>with it? NSA states it just adds Mandatory Access Controls. Does this
>help protect a system or just become a nusance?
I tried a few months ago, and it's a PITA with Debian. The
"William R. Ward" wrote:
> I've replaced the legit usernames and IP's with "xxx" but left them in
> for context. I'm worried that the "date" entries are a consequence of
> some hacker activity, but I have been unable to find any other
> symptoms. I did a web search and did not find any mention
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:40:01PM -0800, William R. Ward wrote:
> xx pts/3xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Wed Mar 21 14:17 still logged in
> date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
> date | Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
On 2001-03-21, William R. Ward wrote:
>My wtmp file seems to have some rather strange entries...
>
>xx pts/3xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Wed Mar 21 14:17 still logged in
>date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
>date | Wed Mar
Has anyone implemented NSA's Secure-Enhanced Linux or has done any work
with it? NSA states it just adds Mandatory Access Controls. Does this
help protect a system or just become a nusance?
Thanks in Advance
Dan
___
To get your own
My wtmp file seems to have some rather strange entries...
xx pts/3xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Wed Mar 21 14:17 still logged in
date { Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
date | Wed Mar 21 02:00 still logged in
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Dan Hutchinson wrote:
>Has anyone implemented NSA's Secure-Enhanced Linux or has done any work
>with it? NSA states it just adds Mandatory Access Controls. Does this
>help protect a system or just become a nusance?
I tried a few months ago, and it's a PITA with Debian. Th
Has anyone implemented NSA's Secure-Enhanced Linux or has done any work
with it? NSA states it just adds Mandatory Access Controls. Does this
help protect a system or just become a nusance?
Thanks in Advance
Dan
___
To get your ow
A colleague of mine successfully setup OpenLDAP and has interfaced several
server applications to it that were originally designed for Netscape Directory
Server. It's running fast and stable so far.
jc
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:25:40AM -0700, Moe Harley wrote:
> I'm playing with the idea of a
A colleague of mine successfully setup OpenLDAP and has interfaced several server
applications to it that were originally designed for Netscape Directory Server. It's
running fast and stable so far.
jc
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:25:40AM -0700, Moe Harley wrote:
> I'm playing with the idea of
21 matches
Mail list logo
