UDP Port 1035

2001-04-07 Thread Tim Uckun
What service runs on UDP port 1035? I did not see it in /etc/services and netstat says that it's active along with tcp 1 and 6 (and others but I know those). Is this normal or should I be scared? -- Tim Uckun Mobile Intelligence

Re: sshd port config and security

2001-04-07 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:57:51PM -0500, Vinh Truong wrote: * Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 15:23]: Sounds like you need to talk to your firewall administrator. If you trust him that is... How can you be sure that he's not snooping on the passing telnet traffic? hmm,

Re: sshd port config and security

2001-04-07 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
Yep. Ssh does. But telnet doesn't. And it *does* look a bit suspicious if your firewall administrator tries to encourage telnet and block ssh... Personally, I think this is more a case of the administrator just wanting to open "standard" services... and ssh isn't considered "standard". Most

Re: Ports to block?

2001-04-07 Thread David Dorgan
Simple solution. Turn off all services and justify each open port. At the network level block all but ports needed from the outside (e.g. ssh may be needed, but does the outside need to be able to get to it? or if you have a static ip on dialup you could add a rule for this to allow you to get

Re: empty log files

2001-04-07 Thread Peter Cordes
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:05:34AM -0500, S. Salman Ahmed wrote: Same here, installing klogd fixed the problem. kernel messages do get logged to /var/log/kern.log. Just out of curiosity I decided to remove klogd to see if the old problem would reappear, but after purging klogd from my

Re: sshd port config and security

2001-04-07 Thread Vinh Truong
* Jean-Marc Boursot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 21:09]: They allow telnet and not ssh? Nice! yeah, afraid of the port-forwarding capabilities in ssh. i can see their point but i'm just as leery of clear-text transmission. oh, well. So you can turn it off. should of thought of that myself. :)

Re: sshd port config and security

2001-04-07 Thread Vinh Truong
* Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 15:23]: Sounds like you need to talk to your firewall administrator. If you trust him that is... How can you be sure that he's not snooping on the passing telnet traffic? hmm, i thought that ssh encrypted traffic between server and client?

Re: sshd port config and security

2001-04-07 Thread Vinh Truong
* Patrick Maheral [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 16:57]: Is the firewall blocking all traffic that has a destination port 22, or or a source port 22? If only the latter, you can tell your ssh client to use a high port number. With OpenSSH, from work I use: ssh -P home #

Re: sshd port config and security

2001-04-07 Thread Peter Cordes
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:19:38AM -0500, Vinh Truong wrote: * Patrick Maheral [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 16:57]: Is the firewall blocking all traffic that has a destination port 22, or or a source port 22? If only the latter, you can tell your ssh client to use a high port number. With

UDP Port 1035

2001-04-07 Thread Tim Uckun
What service runs on UDP port 1035? I did not see it in /etc/services and netstat says that it's active along with tcp 1 and 6 (and others but I know those). Is this normal or should I be scared? -- Tim Uckun Mobile Intelligence

Re: UDP Port 1035

2001-04-07 Thread Berend De Schouwer
On 07 Apr 2001 01:27:54 -0700, Tim Uckun wrote: What service runs on UDP port 1035? I did not see it in /etc/services and netstat says that it's active along with tcp 1 and 6 (and others but I know those). bind does this. It actually binds a UDP port 1024 on startup. Try fuser -v -n udp

Re: UDP Port 1035

2001-04-07 Thread Alexander Hvostov
On 07 Apr 2001 09:34:44 +0200 Berend De Schouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 07 Apr 2001 01:27:54 -0700, Tim Uckun wrote: What service runs on UDP port 1035? I did not see it in /etc/services and netstat says that it's active along with tcp 1 and 6 (and others but I know those). bind

Re: UDP Port 1035

2001-04-07 Thread Tim Uckun
bind does this. It actually binds a UDP port 1024 on startup. Try fuser -v -n udp 1035 to find out. Ah it was bind. Thanks I did not know about the fuser command. Is this normal or should I be scared? First find out why its there before you panic. Either fuser or lsof will tell you.

Re: sshd port config and security

2001-04-07 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:57:51PM -0500, Vinh Truong wrote: * Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010406 15:23]: Sounds like you need to talk to your firewall administrator. If you trust him that is... How can you be sure that he's not snooping on the passing telnet traffic? hmm, i

Re: sshd port config and security

2001-04-07 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
Yep. Ssh does. But telnet doesn't. And it *does* look a bit suspicious if your firewall administrator tries to encourage telnet and block ssh... Personally, I think this is more a case of the administrator just wanting to open standard services... and ssh isn't considered standard. Most of the

Re: Ports to block?

2001-04-07 Thread David Dorgan
Simple solution. Turn off all services and justify each open port. At the network level block all but ports needed from the outside (e.g. ssh may be needed, but does the outside need to be able to get to it? or if you have a static ip on dialup you could add a rule for this to allow you to get to

Re: empty log files

2001-04-07 Thread Peter Cordes
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:05:34AM -0500, S. Salman Ahmed wrote: Same here, installing klogd fixed the problem. kernel messages do get logged to /var/log/kern.log. Just out of curiosity I decided to remove klogd to see if the old problem would reappear, but after purging klogd from my firewall