also sprach Dan Hutchinson (on Fri, 13 Jul 2001 03:51:49PM -0400):
> Does anyone know of a secure network file system
> like Active Directories from Microsoft
^
hahahahaha!
um. do you read bugtraq
or: have you ever administered one of those dreadfully sad
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Dan Hutchinson wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know of a secure network file system like Active Directories
> from Microsoft, or Novell NDS that works with UNIX O/S's like Linux,
> Sun, HP-UX and also with Windows Systems like 95, 98,ME,NT, and 2000.
>
> Just curious
> Dan
>
>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 03:51:49PM -0400, Dan Hutchinson wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know of a secure network file system like Active Directories
> from Microsoft, or Novell NDS that works with UNIX O/S's like Linux,
> Sun, HP-UX and also with Windows Systems like 95, 98,ME,NT, and 2000.
>
> J
Hello,
Does anyone know of a secure network file system like Active Directories
from Microsoft, or Novell NDS that works with UNIX O/S's like Linux,
Sun, HP-UX and also with Windows Systems like 95, 98,ME,NT, and 2000.
Just curious
Dan
I know of NIS, but is that the best UNIX has
_
also sprach Dan Hutchinson (on Fri, 13 Jul 2001 03:51:49PM -0400):
> Does anyone know of a secure network file system
> like Active Directories from Microsoft
^
hahahahaha!
um. do you read bugtraq
or: have you ever administered one of those dreadfully sad
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Dan Hutchinson wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know of a secure network file system like Active Directories
> from Microsoft, or Novell NDS that works with UNIX O/S's like Linux,
> Sun, HP-UX and also with Windows Systems like 95, 98,ME,NT, and 2000.
>
> Just curious
> Dan
>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 03:51:49PM -0400, Dan Hutchinson wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know of a secure network file system like Active Directories
> from Microsoft, or Novell NDS that works with UNIX O/S's like Linux,
> Sun, HP-UX and also with Windows Systems like 95, 98,ME,NT, and 2000.
>
>
Hello,
Does anyone know of a secure network file system like Active Directories
from Microsoft, or Novell NDS that works with UNIX O/S's like Linux,
Sun, HP-UX and also with Windows Systems like 95, 98,ME,NT, and 2000.
Just curious
Dan
I know of NIS, but is that the best UNIX has
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 10:52:09AM +0200, Anders Gjære wrote:
> do sudo default allow the sudo-user to run every program,
> or just the program you spesify?
>
> how will sudo work if you use the "time" command?
>
> like "time vim /etc/passwd"
before asking these questions try reading the sudo a
also sprach Anders Gj?re (on Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:52:09AM +0200):
> do sudo default allow the sudo-user to run every program,
> or just the program you spesify?
the latter, of course.
> how will sudo work if you use the "time" command?
> like "time vim /etc/passwd"
if you allow time with arbitra
do sudo default allow the sudo-user to run every program,
or just the program you spesify?
how will sudo work if you use the "time" command?
like "time vim /etc/passwd"
anders gjære
kvalito.no / concept.fr
-Original Message-
From: Michel Kaempf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13. juli
hi ya
in sudo.conf ... you define what commands users can run as root...
so as long as chown is not listed... they cant "chown" anything sitting
anywhere
c ya
alvin
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Michel Kaempf wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > i am not certain that would solve it en
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> i am not certain that would solve it entirely though, how are you
> restricting them to only chown files in a certain directory?
Just an idea.. does your sudoers file protect you from attacks like the
one below?
sudo chown /place/chown/is/allowed/../../
finally pulled down pgp50i, and elm can now encrypt/decrypt successfully,
but signing fails. "pgp returned error code 7" or something close to that.
anyone have a hint on making these co=operate? both are present stable
distro's.
Curt-
---
Curt Howland Senior Network Engineer
[EMAIL
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 10:52:09AM +0200, Anders Gjære wrote:
> do sudo default allow the sudo-user to run every program,
> or just the program you spesify?
>
> how will sudo work if you use the "time" command?
>
> like "time vim /etc/passwd"
before asking these questions try reading the sudo
also sprach Anders Gj?re (on Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:52:09AM +0200):
> do sudo default allow the sudo-user to run every program,
> or just the program you spesify?
the latter, of course.
> how will sudo work if you use the "time" command?
> like "time vim /etc/passwd"
if you allow time with arbitr
do sudo default allow the sudo-user to run every program,
or just the program you spesify?
how will sudo work if you use the "time" command?
like "time vim /etc/passwd"
anders gjære
kvalito.no / concept.fr
-Original Message-
From: Michel Kaempf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13. ju
hi ya
in sudo.conf ... you define what commands users can run as root...
so as long as chown is not listed... they cant "chown" anything sitting
anywhere
c ya
alvin
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Michel Kaempf wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > i am not certain that would solve it e
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> i am not certain that would solve it entirely though, how are you
> restricting them to only chown files in a certain directory?
Just an idea.. does your sudoers file protect you from attacks like the
one below?
sudo chown /place/chown/is/allowed/../..
finally pulled down pgp50i, and elm can now encrypt/decrypt successfully,
but signing fails. "pgp returned error code 7" or something close to that.
anyone have a hint on making these co=operate? both are present stable
distro's.
Curt-
---
Curt Howland Senior Network Engineer
[EMAIL
20 matches
Mail list logo