-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-071-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Wichert Akkerman
August 10, 2001
-
This is about the 4th time in as many years that I changed my e-mail client
and every time I feel I have gained.
I'm now using mutt now and am still in the process of finetuning. However,
I have the following problem, of which I didn't find a solution yet.
I am using gpg and in communication
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001, Marc Leeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
: kmail sends the gpg messages inline, and upon arrival decodes them
: immediately. In my config, mutt sends them as attachments.
: When I get a kmail message, I have to save it to file and manually
: decode it (not that difficult, but
Hello list
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:03:15PM +1000, Matt Hope wrote:
[...]
: When my friends (2 differnt ones, one of which is planning to switch
: to mutt) get the mails, they get it in an attachment, have to save it
: and decode it manually (apparently kmail is expecting inline messages).
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:19:42PM +0200, Martin Domig wrote:
I am using the same procmail filter and can say that it works
perfectly for incoming pgp/gpg mails. However, this does not solve the
problem with other mail clients that want to have inline PGP messages, and
those are many.
Is
Hello,
I'm not sure this is aan security issue, but i could be exploitable...
From time to time one of my nic's just dies and in /var/log/messages i
have stuff like this:
Aug 9 16:08:59 server kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame c7f9f460 vs
c7f9f460.
Aug 9 16:08:59 server kernel: eth1:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 06:05:38PM +0200, Viljo Marrandi wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure this is aan security issue, but i could be exploitable...
From time to time one of my nic's just dies and in /var/log/messages i
have stuff like this:
Aug 9 16:08:59 server kernel: eth1: Oversized
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:55:49AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
kmail sends the gpg messages inline, and upon arrival decodes them
immediately. In my config, mutt sends them as attachments.
When I get a kmail message, I have to save it to file and manually
decode it (not that difficult, but
On 01-08-09 Martin Domig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:03:15PM +1000, Matt Hope wrote:
[...]
: When my friends (2 differnt ones, one of which is planning to switch
: to mutt) get the mails, they get it in an attachment, have to save it
: and decode it manually (apparently kmail is
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
option pgp_create_traditional. That option might help you very much,
but instead I would suggest that the other MUA's get fixed.
Um, wouldn't that be every other MUA asid from mutt and maybe one or two
others?
-Rob
--
To
I have a little problem with apt-get, i think i am not doing it the
proper way.
When there is a announce that certain package has a bug, (like
gnupg v1.0.5) you can read in www.debian.org that there is a new
package to download (1.0.6-0potato1). Thats OK, but i can't download it
with my
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
option pgp_create_traditional. That option might help you very much,
but instead I would suggest that the other MUA's get fixed.
Um, wouldn't that be every other
Your message, Re: Mutt and inline gpg,
was not delivered to the following recipient:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason: System error: Please re-send your message later.
Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message, Re: Mutt and inline gpg,
was not delivered to the following recipient:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason: System error: Please re-send your message later.
Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message, Port 6000/X11 Won't Close!,
was not delivered to the following recipient:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason: System error: Please re-send your message later.
Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
First, you should (keep cool and ... ;o) ) know which dns server you are
running. Look in the processes (ps -ax) if there is something like bind or
djbdns, or anything that could be a dns server. The lsof command can help
(look at what listens to port 53), as the dpkg and apt-get
This is about the 4th time in as many years that I changed my e-mail client
and every time I feel I have gained.
I'm now using mutt now and am still in the process of finetuning. However,
I have the following problem, of which I didn't find a solution yet.
I am using gpg and in communication with
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001, Marc Leeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
: kmail sends the gpg messages inline, and upon arrival decodes them
: immediately. In my config, mutt sends them as attachments.
: When I get a kmail message, I have to save it to file and manually
: decode it (not that difficult, but
Hello list
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:03:15PM +1000, Matt Hope wrote:
[...]
: When my friends (2 differnt ones, one of which is planning to switch
: to mutt) get the mails, they get it in an attachment, have to save it
: and decode it manually (apparently kmail is expecting inline messages).
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:19:42PM +0200, Martin Domig wrote:
I am using the same procmail filter and can say that it works
perfectly for incoming pgp/gpg mails. However, this does not solve the
problem with other mail clients that want to have inline PGP messages, and
those are many.
Is
It sounds like the real fix for this is to change kmail's behavior
If none of the involved parties is willing to, I volunteer to take
it to the kmail mailing list at:
subscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
archive:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kmailr=1w=2
I did notice that there is a bug
Hello,
I'm not sure this is aan security issue, but i could be exploitable...
From time to time one of my nic's just dies and in /var/log/messages i
have stuff like this:
Aug 9 16:08:59 server kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame c7f9f460 vs
c7f9f460.
Aug 9 16:08:59 server kernel: eth1:
Viljo,
actually I can´t help with the error you posted.
But to complete the collection here´s an error that I see frequently on the
external interfaces of our routers.
Suspect short first fragment.
eth0 PROTO=6 213.13.177.121:0 217.29.8.82:0 L=20 S=0x00 I=63073 F=0x6000
T=102 (#0)
They do not
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 06:05:38PM +0200, Viljo Marrandi wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure this is aan security issue, but i could be exploitable...
From time to time one of my nic's just dies and in /var/log/messages i
have stuff like this:
Aug 9 16:08:59 server kernel: eth1: Oversized
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:55:49AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
kmail sends the gpg messages inline, and upon arrival decodes them
immediately. In my config, mutt sends them as attachments.
When I get a kmail message, I have to save it to file and manually
decode it (not that difficult, but
On 01-08-09 Martin Domig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:03:15PM +1000, Matt Hope wrote:
[...]
: When my friends (2 differnt ones, one of which is planning to switch
: to mutt) get the mails, they get it in an attachment, have to save it
: and decode it manually (apparently kmail is
Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That option might help you very much, but instead I would suggest
that the other MUA's get fixed.
I'd like to see all mailers complying with RFC2822 first.
--
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors!
If at first you don't succeed,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:17:33PM -0700, Dale Southard wrote:
Marko Kreen marko@l-t.ee writes:
I think this
is not good, it takes away flexibility. IMHO it would be better
if only /etc/init.d/rc ( rcS) checks whether a service should be
auto-started on boot. That way the responsibility
Marko Kreen marko@l-t.ee writes:
If the ``do I run service X'' check is done in rcS it means that each
init.d script is either on or off. This would eliminate the
possibility of having more than one check in a script -- for example,
it would be logical to configure the existing Debian
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:38:52PM -0700, Dale Southard wrote:
Marko Kreen marko@l-t.ee writes:
Well, we have basically one init script per package. Now I want
state, that _nothing_ from this package gets started. Do I need
examine the init script then one-by-one disable all vars?
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
option pgp_create_traditional. That option might help you very much,
but instead I would suggest that the other MUA's get fixed.
Um, wouldn't that be every other MUA asid from mutt and maybe one or two
others?
-Rob
Marko Kreen marko@l-t.ee writes:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:38:52PM -0700, Dale Southard wrote:
Marko Kreen marko@l-t.ee writes:
Well, we have basically one init script per package. Now I want
state, that _nothing_ from this package gets started. Do I need
examine the init script
I have a little problem with apt-get, i think i am not doing it the
proper way.
When there is a announce that certain package has a bug, (like
gnupg v1.0.5) you can read in www.debian.org that there is a new
package to download (1.0.6-0potato1). Thats OK, but i can't download it
with my
Hi
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:51:30PM +0200, Alberto Cort?s wrote:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
What are the official sources if you want to have an up to date,
secure
-. Alberto Cortés (2001-08-09) :
| I have a little problem with apt-get, i think i am not doing it the
| proper way.
|
|When there is a announce that certain package has a bug, (like
| gnupg v1.0.5) you can read in www.debian.org that there is a new
| package to download
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
option pgp_create_traditional. That option might help you very much,
but instead I would suggest that the other MUA's get fixed.
Um, wouldn't that be every other
Your message, Re: Mutt and inline gpg,
was not delivered to the following recipient:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason: System error: Please re-send your message later.
Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at
Hi Martin!
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001, Martin Domig wrote:
Is there a way to make mutt send inline PGP messages instead of the
MIME attachment form?
Although there is a way to tell mutt not to use PGP/MIME, Don't Do It. Mutt
will mistype the message as application/pgp and royally screw up the
Your message, Re: Mutt and inline gpg,
was not delivered to the following recipient:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason: System error: Please re-send your message later.
Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---BeginMessage---
Hi Martin!
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001, Martin Domig wrote:
Is there a way to make mutt send
I use debian 2.2 (woody/unstable) with kernal 2.4.7, i use login.app to login
to X. I believe i have the --no-listen command set. However, no madder what i
do port 6000 still remains open. I really want to close this port for security
reasons! can someone please help me?! - Thank you!
--
Your message, Port 6000/X11 Won't Close!,
was not delivered to the following recipient:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason: System error: Please re-send your message later.
Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---BeginMessage---
I use debian 2.2 (woody/unstable) with kernal 2.4.7, i use login.app to login
to X.
41 matches
Mail list logo
