argh, this sounds like the sort of thing that would've been useful
when i set up rsync on our company backup machine (as opposed to writing
a small shell that chrooted and ran rsync).
it doesn't appear to be in debian unstable; apt-cache shows no third
party module for it, and it's most definitely
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes. Somehow, if you're going to run something, it needs to be in the
> > jail. Various alternatives to consider for various reasons : busybox,
> > rbash, sash.
> > What would be nice would be a union-mount, so you could graft a "real"
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 04:35:14PM +0100, Tim Haynes wrote:
> Rishi L Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the only way to accomplish a chroot IS to include all the files
> > in the jail that the user needs.
> [snip]
>
> Yes. Somehow, if you're going to run something, it needs to be in
I would be interested only in the chroot patch. Is there any
reason you have not contributed it to openssh? Do you want me to do it?
Best regards
Javi
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:24:13PM +0300, Ivan Dimitrov wrote:
> recently i've worked on a small patch for openssh that
On Friday 26 October 2001 09:14 am, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> I have been asked for this and I was trying to figure out how to do it
> (would document it later on in the Securing-Debian-Manual). So please,
> excuse me if you feel this is off-topic.
>
> The problem is, how can an admin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 04:35:14PM +0100, Tim Haynes wrote:
> Rishi L Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the only way to accomplish a chroot IS to include all the files
> > in the jail that the user needs.
> [snip]
>
> Yes. Somehow, if you're going to run something, it needs to be in
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:25:28PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> That's a wrong assumption. At least RedHat contains a pam_chroot.so
> module which can be used in connection with the latest ssh to limit a
> user into a chroot. I'm just wondering if that module is packaged
> already for debian or n
argh, this sounds like the sort of thing that would've been useful
when i set up rsync on our company backup machine (as opposed to writing
a small shell that chrooted and ran rsync).
it doesn't appear to be in debian unstable; apt-cache shows no third
party module for it, and it's most definitel
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes. Somehow, if you're going to run something, it needs to be in the
> > jail. Various alternatives to consider for various reasons : busybox,
> > rbash, sash.
> > What would be nice would be a union-mount, so you could graft a "real
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 04:35:14PM +0100, Tim Haynes wrote:
> Rishi L Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the only way to accomplish a chroot IS to include all the files
> > in the jail that the user needs.
> [snip]
>
> Yes. Somehow, if you're going to run something, it needs to be in
I would be interested only in the chroot patch. Is there any
reason you have not contributed it to openssh? Do you want me to do it?
Best regards
Javi
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:24:13PM +0300, Ivan Dimitrov wrote:
> recently i've worked on a small patch for openssh that
On Friday 26 October 2001 09:14 am, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> I have been asked for this and I was trying to figure out how to do it
> (would document it later on in the Securing-Debian-Manual). So please,
> excuse me if you feel this is off-topic.
>
> The problem is, how can an admi
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:25:28PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> That's a wrong assumption. At least RedHat contains a pam_chroot.so
> module which can be used in connection with the latest ssh to limit a
> user into a chroot. I'm just wondering if that module is packaged
> already for debian or
13 matches
Mail list logo
