lol, i was just checking if the mailing list was still working.
i did not get a massage for a while.
On Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:37 PM, Stephen Andrew
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This is a test sorry[tm].
As sorry[tm] development has taken longer than expected due to
apologetic
alt.humor.debian.org?
At 01:24 PM 10/31/2001 +0100, Daniel Polombo wrote:
Hans wrote:
i did not get a massage for a while.
I'm very sorry to hear that. As a matter of fact, neither did I. But are
you sure this is appropriate content for this list? :)
--
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I noticed repeated UDP 62516 access attempts on our network. Now I'm
wondering what is going on. Anyone have any info/ideas.
The attempts repeat every 5 seconds and come in packages of 3. The
first two originate from port 62516 and the third from a steadily
increasing port above 1024. The
lol, i was just checking if the mailing list was still working.
i did not get a massage for a while.
On Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:37 PM, Stephen Andrew
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a test sorry[tm].
As sorry[tm] development has taken longer than expected due to
apologetic
Hans wrote:
i did not get a massage for a while.
I'm very sorry to hear that. As a matter of fact, neither did I. But are you
sure this is appropriate content for this list? :)
--
Daniel
alt.humor.debian.org?
At 01:24 PM 10/31/2001 +0100, Daniel Polombo wrote:
Hans wrote:
i did not get a massage for a while.
I'm very sorry to hear that. As a matter of fact, neither did I. But are
you sure this is appropriate content for this list? :)
--
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I noticed repeated UDP 62516 access attempts on our network. Now I'm
wondering what is going on. Anyone have any info/ideas.
The attempts repeat every 5 seconds and come in packages of 3. The
first two originate from port 62516 and the third from a steadily
increasing port above 1024. The
7 matches
Mail list logo