And pleanty of open relay servers, too.
obSec: You do have your SMTP transfer agent configured not to act as a
relay, right?
Curt-
-Original Message-
From: Petro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 03:09
To: Yooseong Yang
Cc: k l u r t; debian-security@lists.debian
And pleanty of open relay servers, too.
obSec: You do have your SMTP transfer agent configured not to act as a
relay, right?
Curt-
-Original Message-
From: Petro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 03:09
To: Yooseong Yang
Cc: k l u r t; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Ahh...hah.
I looked a few times in the 'make menuconfig' and saw that I included
everything in the kernel build. I didn't include Connection Tracking which
I thought I only needed for NAT, but it looks like this gave me the option
that I was missing. Thanks.
Oh, yeah I only used the default ru
On 17 Dec 2001 14:34:12 +1100
Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so assuming that dpkg (and/or apt?) can deal with embedded gpg
> signiatures in .deb files, how do we get maintainers to start
> using them?
File bugs?
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Jeff" == Bender, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> I am having troubles with IPTables. My rules are having troubles
Jeff> with handling "-m state --state ESTABLISHED" options. The error I
Jeff> get is "iptables: No chain/target/match by
- Original Message -
From: "Bender, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:08 PM
Subject: Problem with IPTables
> I am having troubles with IPTables. My rules are having troubles with
> handling "-m state --state ESTABLISHED" options. The error I get is
> "ip
i didn't see anything wrong with it, so i ran it:
bash# ./test.firewall
Start Rules
Allow DNS servers incoming traffic...done
i think your missing an option in your kernel when you compiled it last.
check your kernel config.
these are the commands i ran:
iptables -F
iptables -X
iptables -Z
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:48:13PM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> >can you speak korean? if so give them a call or a nasty email for us.
> I am be shameful of this kinda spam stuffs as a korean.
> I send an email to hanmail mail administrator about this kinda
> problem. If I got some mails from who
I am having troubles with IPTables. My rules are having troubles with
handling "-m state --state ESTABLISHED" options. The error I get is
"iptables: No chain/target/match by that name". Any ideas? Here is my
script below.
# http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jns/security/iptables/index.html
# Prepar
Ahh...hah.
I looked a few times in the 'make menuconfig' and saw that I included
everything in the kernel build. I didn't include Connection Tracking which
I thought I only needed for NAT, but it looks like this gave me the option
that I was missing. Thanks.
Oh, yeah I only used the default r
On 17 Dec 2001 14:34:12 +1100
Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so assuming that dpkg (and/or apt?) can deal with embedded gpg
> signiatures in .deb files, how do we get maintainers to start
> using them?
File bugs?
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, osci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Jeff" == Bender, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> I am having troubles with IPTables. My rules are having troubles
Jeff> with handling "-m state --state ESTABLISHED" options. The error I
Jeff> get is "iptables: No chain/target/match by
- Original Message -
From: "Bender, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:08 PM
Subject: Problem with IPTables
> I am having troubles with IPTables. My rules are having troubles with
> handling "-m state --state ESTABLISHED" options. The
i didn't see anything wrong with it, so i ran it:
bash# ./test.firewall
Start Rules
Allow DNS servers incoming traffic...done
i think your missing an option in your kernel when you compiled it last.
check your kernel config.
these are the commands i ran:
iptables -F
iptables -X
iptables -Z
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:48:13PM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> >can you speak korean? if so give them a call or a nasty email for us.
> I am be shameful of this kinda spam stuffs as a korean.
> I send an email to hanmail mail administrator about this kinda
> problem. If I got some mails from wh
I am having troubles with IPTables. My rules are having troubles with
handling "-m state --state ESTABLISHED" options. The error I get is
"iptables: No chain/target/match by that name". Any ideas? Here is my
script below.
# http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jns/security/iptables/index.html
# Prepa
Previously Hendrik Naumann wrote:
> All or just those that are not signed correctly?
All, since none are signed currently. If we only use signatures
from developers the debsig policy would also be huge since you
would need to list 500+ keys in it and update it regularly.
> Is there the possibilit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
> > Could anyone point me to some documentation about how this fits
> > within the 'usual' apt-get update apt-get install procedure.
>
> The idea is:
> * packages are signed using debsig and get one (or more) embedded
> signatures
> * apt & frien
>can you speak korean? if so give them a call or a nasty email for us.
I am be shameful of this kinda spam stuffs as a korean.
I send an email to hanmail mail administrator about this kinda
problem. If I got some mails from whom is concerned, I'll get posted of it.
Yooseong
Hello list,
Is postfix 0.0.2005.S(woody) also vulernable?
--
Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi,
on running debsums I find usr/bin/emacs19 and usr/bin/emacs-19.34 fail md5
check. So I then uninstall emacs19 package, ftp a fresh deb from debian site.
After (re)install debsums reports the same problem - but the install involved a
'byte compile' (and dpkg -s emacs19 shows no md5 data anywa
Previously Hendrik Naumann wrote:
> All or just those that are not signed correctly?
All, since none are signed currently. If we only use signatures
from developers the debsig policy would also be huge since you
would need to list 500+ keys in it and update it regularly.
> Is there the possibili
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
> > Could anyone point me to some documentation about how this fits
> > within the 'usual' apt-get update apt-get install procedure.
>
> The idea is:
> * packages are signed using debsig and get one (or more) embedded
> signatures
> * apt & frie
>can you speak korean? if so give them a call or a nasty email for us.
I am be shameful of this kinda spam stuffs as a korean.
I send an email to hanmail mail administrator about this kinda
problem. If I got some mails from whom is concerned, I'll get posted of it.
Yooseong
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hello list,
Is postfix 0.0.2005.S(woody) also vulernable?
--
Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* nrvale0
| > maybe have a look at cfengine?
| > or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
|
| I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
| that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
| something that should be protected and thus
hi,
on running debsums I find usr/bin/emacs19 and usr/bin/emacs-19.34 fail md5 check. So I
then uninstall emacs19 package, ftp a fresh deb from debian site. After (re)install
debsums reports the same problem - but the install involved a 'byte compile' (and dpkg
-s emacs19 shows no md5 data anyw
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Dietmar Braun wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> For months I am now listening to various debian lists, and I am quite happy
> about the help and the information I can gather from it.
>
> One annoying thing is the spam which comes regularly about once a week or
> so from hanmail.net
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Simon Hill wrote:
> so assuming that dpkg (and/or apt?) can
> deal with embedded gpg signiatures in .deb
> files, how do we get maintainers to start
> using them?
We deploy the required infrastructure to make good use of signatures in the
archive, test it, send email explai
* nrvale0
| > maybe have a look at cfengine?
| > or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
|
| I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
| that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
| something that should be protected and thu
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 06:22:03PM -0600, Daniel Rychlik wrote:
> How do I stop this from happening. Apparently my bud telented to port 25
> and somehow sent mail from my root account. Any suggestions, white papers
> or links? Id would like to block the telnet application all together, but I
> d
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Dietmar Braun wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> For months I am now listening to various debian lists, and I am quite happy
> about the help and the information I can gather from it.
>
> One annoying thing is the spam which comes regularly about once a week or
> so from hanmail.ne
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Simon Hill wrote:
> so assuming that dpkg (and/or apt?) can
> deal with embedded gpg signiatures in .deb
> files, how do we get maintainers to start
> using them?
We deploy the required infrastructure to make good use of signatures in the
archive, test it, send email expla
Example header:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from m1000.netcologne.de (m1000.netcologne.de [194.8.194.104])
by mailstore1.netcologne.de (Mirapoint)
with ESMTP id ADY56704;
Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:57:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.o
Hello list,
For months I am now listening to various debian lists, and I am quite happy
about the help and the information I can gather from it.
One annoying thing is the spam which comes regularly about once a week or
so from hanmail.net (see the headers below as example)...
Isn't it possib
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 06:22:03PM -0600, Daniel Rychlik wrote:
> How do I stop this from happening. Apparently my bud telented to port 25
> and somehow sent mail from my root account. Any suggestions, white papers
> or links? Id would like to block the telnet application all together, but I
>
Example header:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from m1000.netcologne.de (m1000.netcologne.de [194.8.194.104])
by mailstore1.netcologne.de (Mirapoint)
with ESMTP id ADY56704;
Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:57:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.o
Hello list,
For months I am now listening to various debian lists, and I am quite happy
about the help and the information I can gather from it.
One annoying thing is the spam which comes regularly about once a week or
so from hanmail.net (see the headers below as example)...
Isn't it possible
38 matches
Mail list logo