On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:31:24AM +0100, Oliver M . Bolzer wrote:
> I've heard Razor is (configurabule) part of SpamAssassin. I'd recommend
> disabling that check because somebody is tagging about 1/3 of Bugtraq mail
> in Razor thus sending it to the Spam folder.
Or you can add
whitelist_from
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:03:54PM -0600, Bryan Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> My ISP uses SpamAssassin and it works quite nicely. Not
> perfectly, but well enough that I like it. It's filtered
> out about 8M bytes of spam in the past 16 days. SpamAssassin
> puts some new headers
Heh, what's funny is that SpamAssassin tagged this message
you sent as spam and sent it to my spam folder.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bryan
Andersen
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:04 PM
Sebastian Rittau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> > Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > We could start by blocking @aol.com =)
>
> > Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't
> > even know it was there u
Heh, what's funny is that SpamAssassin tagged this message
you sent as spam and sent it to my spam folder.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bryan
Andersen
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:0
Sebastian Rittau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> > Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > We could start by blocking @aol.com =)
>
> > Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't
> > even know it was there
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We could start by blocking @aol.com =)
> Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't
> even know it was there until people started replying to it, and i
Michael Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:56:56AM +0100, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > please can me tell somebody how to make MD5 passwords in order
> > to supply it to ftppasswd file?
>
> You just need to call the standard crypt() function with the
> apropr
martin f krafft wrote:
> that was me, and no, noone has mentioned any bad aspects yet, other than your
> users having to type the old password twice. however, it's not the
> solution i amlooking for, so i am implementing a highly secure way to do it
> over and
> SSL/TLS-encrypted webform with emph
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We could start by blocking @aol.com =)
> Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't
> even know it was there until people started replying to it, and
And if one do:
procedure example is
type C_String_Type is array (1..10) of Character;
a : C_String_type;
begin
a := ('1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','A','B','C','D');
end example;
then when compiling:
% gnatmake example.adb
gnatgcc -c example.adb
example.
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002 (11:13) :
>
> hi ya ralf
>
> i would have thought that gcc would barf on b[20]='X'
> and similarly for theother variable assignments since its not prev
> allocated/defined.. and yet explicitly assigned (incorrectly??)...
Why there are no range te
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:05:54PM +0100, Ralf Dreibrodt wrote:
> and then no user, who has a valid shell has to enter the old password
> from user x, when he wants to change the password of user x.
> perhaps even if x=root ;-)
You have to enter it once for the ssh daemon anyways. He just wanted to
Michael Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:56:56AM +0100, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > please can me tell somebody how to make MD5 passwords in order
> > to supply it to ftppasswd file?
>
> You just need to call the standard crypt() function with the
> aprop
martin f krafft wrote:
> that was me, and no, noone has mentioned any bad aspects yet, other than your
> users having to type the old password twice. however, it's not the
> solution i amlooking for, so i am implementing a highly secure way to do it over and
> SSL/TLS-encrypted webform with emphas
Hi,
David N Moore wrote:
>
> i'm a new poster here, but one thing that strikes me is that the
> source to passwd should be hanging around somewhere. It wouldn't be
> incredibly difficult to make a custom version which does not ask for
> the original password, right? Then you could set it to be
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:17:59AM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:23:35AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> >
> >
> > also sprach Rob VanFleet
> > > On this list (I beleive) I saw someone mention the use of /bin/passwd
> > > as a shell for mail-only users so they can easily
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:23:35AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>
>
> also sprach Rob VanFleet
> > On this list (I beleive) I saw someone mention the use of /bin/passwd
> > as a shell for mail-only users so they can easily change their password
> > without having to ask someone. Is this a secur
And if one do:
procedure example is
type C_String_Type is array (1..10) of Character;
a : C_String_type;
begin
a := ('1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','A','B','C','D');
end example;
then when compiling:
% gnatmake example.adb
gnatgcc -c example.adb
example
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002 (11:13) :
>
> hi ya ralf
>
> i would have thought that gcc would barf on b[20]='X'
> and similarly for theother variable assignments since its not prev
> allocated/defined.. and yet explicitly assigned (incorrectly??)...
Why there are no range t
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:05:54PM +0100, Ralf Dreibrodt wrote:
> and then no user, who has a valid shell has to enter the old password
> from user x, when he wants to change the password of user x.
> perhaps even if x=root ;-)
You have to enter it once for the ssh daemon anyways. He just wanted t
Hi,
David N Moore wrote:
>
> i'm a new poster here, but one thing that strikes me is that the
> source to passwd should be hanging around somewhere. It wouldn't be
> incredibly difficult to make a custom version which does not ask for
> the original password, right? Then you could set it to be
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:17:59AM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:23:35AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> >
> >
> > also sprach Rob VanFleet
> > > On this list (I beleive) I saw someone mention the use of /bin/passwd
> > > as a shell for mail-only users so they can easil
On Jan 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> it indeed sounds VERY interesting (not only to me) :-)
> although I never dealt with special kernel modifications.
> But I'll give it a go..can anyone recommend any other
> kernel security patch sites? ..would be great!
>
the only thing you need to bear in
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:23:35AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>
>
> also sprach Rob VanFleet
> > On this list (I beleive) I saw someone mention the use of /bin/passwd
> > as a shell for mail-only users so they can easily change their password
> > without having to ask someone. Is this a secu
To all:
Sorry about including the list in reply.
David.
On Jan 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> it indeed sounds VERY interesting (not only to me) :-)
> although I never dealt with special kernel modifications.
> But I'll give it a go..can anyone recommend any other
> kernel security patch sites? ..would be great!
>
the only thing you need to bear in
To all:
Sorry about including the list in reply.
David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:03:26 -0500 (EST), Emmanuel Valliet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There was a good article of Aleph One on buffer overflows called
>'Smashing the stack for fun and profit'. Phrack 49.
>Search the web and enjoy :)
I found this one to be quite informative too:
http://www.cultd
Hi,
Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> We could start by blocking @aol.com =)
Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't
even know it was there until people started replying to it, and i had to
look up the original posting in my spam folder..
Greets,
Ro
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:56:56AM +0100, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> please can me tell somebody how to make MD5 passwords in order
> to supply it to ftppasswd file?
You just need to call the standard crypt() function with the
apropriate arguments. You can use perl or python or C or
what
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:03:26 -0500 (EST), Emmanuel Valliet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There was a good article of Aleph One on buffer overflows called
>'Smashing the stack for fun and profit'. Phrack 49.
>Search the web and enjoy :)
I found this one to be quite informative too:
http://www.cult
Hi everyone,
please can me tell somebody how to make MD5 passwords in order
to supply it to ftppasswd file?
Thanks
Rainer Sigl
also sprach Rob VanFleet
> On this list (I beleive) I saw someone mention the use of /bin/passwd
> as a shell for mail-only users so they can easily change their password
> without having to ask someone. Is this a secure option, or am I
> missing some glaring problems? If so, what are some othe
Hi,
Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> We could start by blocking @aol.com =)
Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't
even know it was there until people started replying to it, and i had to
look up the original posting in my spam folder..
Greets,
R
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:56:56AM +0100, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> please can me tell somebody how to make MD5 passwords in order
> to supply it to ftppasswd file?
You just need to call the standard crypt() function with the
apropriate arguments. You can use perl or python or C or
wha
36 matches
Mail list logo
