Hi,
Just thought I'd chip inn some support for LDAP. Also a kerberos
pointer:
www.bayour.com has a very good ldap+kerberos howto for debian written by
Turbo Fredrikson.
Also you should check out directory administrator for admining your
directory. A simple ldap client for administrating ldap
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:51:50AM +0800, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
Just wanted to make it clear the the email i sent about Neomail was
purely to let other people know about a program that i thought was worth
mentioning, it had nothing to do with Ernie Miller and was not intended
to be
Sayin Internet Kullanicisi,
Turkiye'de yayin yapanlar basta olmak uzere, Dunya'daki tum sifreli TV kanallarini
cozen ve basit bir TV kartiyla bu yayinlari bilgisayarinizdan size izleme olanagi
saglayan, sifre kirici programlarin kayitli oldugu,
DECODER CD (v2.0) satisa sunulmustur (40 EURO +
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:36:17PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
this also allows crackers to access your userbase, unlike libpam-ldap,
where you are not forced to allow userpassword read access to the
database. The cracker just needs to hack this machine, read the password
from config and
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:51:50AM +0800, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to make it clear the the email i sent about Neomail was
purely to let other people know about a program that i thought was worth
mentioning, it had nothing to do with Ernie Miller and was not intended
In article 20020408094142.GA3342@espresso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:51:50AM +0800, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
Just wanted to make it clear the the email i sent about Neomail was=20
purely to let other people know about a program that i thought was worth=
mentioning,
Hi,
Is anyone aware of a vulnerablity that is characterised by the following
against a www server?
or is the ^E etc just a way of trying to hide the variuos attempts below?
[Sat Apr 6 02:44:07 2002] [error] [client 24.101.140.253] Invalid
method in request ^E^A
[Sat Apr 6 02:44:07 2002]
The access request for /..À¯../..À¯../cmd1.exe indicates that this
is some kind of Microsoft bug (no suprises there). I recieve plenty
of probes like this a day, it's probably just some hacker running an
automated script to check for vulnerable sites. Nothing to worry
about unless you're
--
Pozdrowienia,
Bartek.
###
# Keep It Sipmle Stupid! #
# http://sknauk.wpk.p.lodz.pl #
###
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I am using potato, from 6 month now, and well, I like it very much, but
something is chocking me very much:
some log files, some configuration files, and some other things I don't
expected are world readable.
So, I know, I could change it by hand. But it seems a generic behaviour
of
Gabor Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Basically, I'd like to keep the setup as closed as possible so I make
a hole in /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks during the PREINIT stage to let
the DHCPDISCOVER broadcast out (and a reply back in eventually, taking
this one step
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:13:41PM +0200, Victor Vuillard wrote:
the fswcert tool, which is used to extract private key from
certificate was before in freeswan package. I was not able to find it in
1.95 version of freeswan. Anyone knows why it has been removed ???
Because it's no longer
On Tuesday, 2002-04-09 at 00:03:20 -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:13:41PM +0200, Victor Vuillard wrote:
the fswcert tool, which is used to extract private key from
certificate was before in freeswan package. I was not able to find it in
1.95 version of freeswan.
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
I suspect that if all your boxes are running Debian that your life will
be made easier by all the Debian kerberos packages.
This is an interesting thread, and this comment just gave me an idea.
What if you use FreeS/WAN (or really, any sort of IPsec)?
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:22:12PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
What if you use FreeS/WAN (or really, any sort of IPsec)? It can be set
up in a mode that's called opportunistic encryption that will use IPsec
for communication when it's available and allow other traffic to proceed
as normal. In
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:14:26PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
Two choices (I like lists :) ):
(1) use libpam-ldap:
i recommend this. Even though the current pam system is a pain to
modify.. if you modify one file and it gets updated in the package it
will nag about it.. you can't tell if
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:23:17AM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:14:26PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
Two choices (I like lists :) ):
(1) use libpam-ldap:
i recommend this.
I also recommend this.
(2) don't use libpam-ldap:
You don't have to use
Hi,
Just thought I'd chip inn some support for LDAP. Also a kerberos
pointer:
www.bayour.com has a very good ldap+kerberos howto for debian written by
Turbo Fredrikson.
Also you should check out directory administrator for admining your
directory. A simple ldap client for administrating ldap
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:51:50AM +0800, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
Just wanted to make it clear the the email i sent about Neomail was
purely to let other people know about a program that i thought was worth
mentioning, it had nothing to do with Ernie Miller and was not intended
to be
Sayin Internet Kullanicisi,
Turkiye'de yayin yapanlar basta olmak uzere, Dunya'daki tum sifreli TV
kanallarini cozen ve basit bir TV kartiyla bu yayinlari bilgisayarinizdan size
izleme olanagi saglayan, sifre kirici programlarin kayitli oldugu,
DECODER CD (v2.0) satisa sunulmustur (40 EURO +
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:36:17PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
this also allows crackers to access your userbase, unlike libpam-ldap,
where you are not forced to allow userpassword read access to the
database. The cracker just needs to hack this machine, read the password
from config and
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:51:50AM +0800, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to make it clear the the email i sent about Neomail was
purely to let other people know about a program that i thought was worth
mentioning, it had nothing to do with Ernie Miller and was not intended
to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:51:50AM +0800, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
Just wanted to make it clear the the email i sent about Neomail was=20
purely to let other people know about a program that i thought was worth=
mentioning, it had nothing
Hi,
Is anyone aware of a vulnerablity that is characterised by the following
against a www server?
or is the ^E etc just a way of trying to hide the variuos attempts below?
[Sat Apr 6 02:44:07 2002] [error] [client 24.101.140.253] Invalid
method in request ^E^A
[Sat Apr 6 02:44:07 2002]
The access request for /..À¯../..À¯../cmd1.exe indicates that this
is some kind of Microsoft bug (no suprises there). I recieve plenty
of probes like this a day, it's probably just some hacker running an
automated script to check for vulnerable sites. Nothing to worry
about unless you're running
--
Pozdrowienia,
Bartek.
###
# Keep It Sipmle Stupid! #
# http://sknauk.wpk.p.lodz.pl #
###
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I am using potato, from 6 month now, and well, I like it very much, but
something is chocking me very much:
some log files, some configuration files, and some other things I don't
expected are world readable.
So, I know, I could change it by hand. But it seems a generic behaviour
of
--
Pozdrowienia,
Bartek.
###
# Keep It Sipmle Stupid! #
# http://sknauk.wpk.p.lodz.pl #
###
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 23:45:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Bartłomiej Świercz [EMAIL
Gabor Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Basically, I'd like to keep the setup as closed as possible so I make
a hole in /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks during the PREINIT stage to let
the DHCPDISCOVER broadcast out (and a reply back in eventually, taking
this one step
31 matches
Mail list logo
