also sprach Dan Faerch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.27.2120 +0200]:
> > you know their algorithm against MAC table overflow?
> No i dont.. I would be very interrested in reading about it, if you know of
> a link.. Im sure that it would be possible to enforce some level of
> security..
it's quite s
also sprach Dan Faerch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.27.2120 +0200]:
> > you know their algorithm against MAC table overflow?
> No i dont.. I would be very interrested in reading about it, if you know of
> a link.. Im sure that it would be possible to enforce some level of
> security..
it's quite
Gareth Bowker wrote:
>If someone's already logged in, and they visit a webpage on the same domain
>which asks for a username and password for the same realm as the one used
to
>log in, the browser will send the username/password pair without asking the
>user for any confirmation.
>At least I assu
Gareth Bowker wrote:
>If someone's already logged in, and they visit a webpage on the same domain
>which asks for a username and password for the same realm as the one used
to
>log in, the browser will send the username/password pair without asking the
>user for any confirmation.
>At least I ass
also sprach vdongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.27.1812 +0200]:
> > Does the connection tracking hold the connections even if the
> > firewall
> > was flushed?
> >
> > If it is so, is it a bug or a feature?
> did you by chance forget to flush all tables and just flushed by doing
> iptables -F ??
> Does the connection tracking hold the connections even if the
> firewall
> was flushed?
>
> If it is so, is it a bug or a feature?
did you by chance forget to flush all tables and just flushed by doing
iptables -F ???
Gr,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
also sprach vdongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.27.1812 +0200]:
> > Does the connection tracking hold the connections even if the
> > firewall
> > was flushed?
> >
> > If it is so, is it a bug or a feature?
> did you by chance forget to flush all tables and just flushed by doing
> iptables -F ?
> Does the connection tracking hold the connections even if the
> firewall
> was flushed?
>
> If it is so, is it a bug or a feature?
did you by chance forget to flush all tables and just flushed by doing
iptables -F ???
Gr,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
hi ya
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Marcin Bednarz wrote:
> > but when i try to connect from 192.168.1.10 and 11 my server is allways
> > give a message :
> > ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
i just ran into that same silly exact message
turns out in our case... that t
hi ya
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Marcin Bednarz wrote:
> > but when i try to connect from 192.168.1.10 and 11 my server is allways
> > give a message :
> > ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
i just ran into that same silly exact message
turns out in our case... that
Steve Mickeler wrote:
>
> Trust not in switches.
>
> They too can be easily manipulated unless you have locked them down at a
> mac address and port level.
>
> 'apt-get install dsniff' ; 'man arpspoof'
Of course, which is one of the things I had in mind when I said:
> > topology. Switches tend
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:32:45AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Dan Faerch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.26.1955 +0200]:
> > Second more, if your users are allowed to have pages on the same
> > address as the login system, the browser can, without much effort,
> > be tricked into givi
Steve Mickeler wrote:
>
> Trust not in switches.
>
> They too can be easily manipulated unless you have locked them down at a
> mac address and port level.
>
> 'apt-get install dsniff' ; 'man arpspoof'
Of course, which is one of the things I had in mind when I said:
> > topology. Switches ten
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:32:45AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Dan Faerch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.26.1955 +0200]:
> > Second more, if your users are allowed to have pages on the same
> > address as the login system, the browser can, without much effort,
> > be tricked into giv
14 matches
Mail list logo
