On Mon 10 Jun 2002 18:00, Anne Carasik wrote:
> > After reading the manpage to quote above, I noticed that it's
> > only applicable to SSH1 anyway, so I guess it doesn't matter.
> > :)
>
> What, compression? Compression should work with both SSH1 and SSH2
> protocols.
Yes, that's what I was refe
Someone explain this to me:
This guy is sitting back, waiting for suckers to visit his exploit-laden
website, correct?
grok.
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 01:33, Kim chulmin wrote:
You're not going to believe what's happening to me now.
someone is doing an experiment on me.
I mean an experiment on a
This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
> On Mon 10 Jun 2002 13:23, Anne Carasik wrote:
> > This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
> As in, "This one time, at band camp..."? >;) Also, sorry about
> the wretched linebreaks, folks. Good ol Outlook.
Yes, exactly. :) I got tired of the typical attribution lin
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:13:06PM -0400, Jeff Bonner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote...
> 3) Any reason you *wouldn't* want to use compression in SSH?
Besides the potential save on bandwidth, it depends on what you
transfer over the wire. If you are lucky, the space saving is so big
that you save mor
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon 10 Jun 2002 15:30, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> Should have absolutely no problems connecting to sshd on Woody
> or Sid from Windows using SecureCRT 3.4 or SecureFX 1.9 as I run 3.4.1
> and 1.9.6 respectively from Windows 2000 with no problem on multiple
> machines... I set the SSH Server
On Mon 10 Jun 2002 13:24, Mark Janssen wrote:
> Run the ssh daemon with debugging on (2 levels or more) and check the
> output:
>
> sshd -d -d -d -p
> ssh -v -p 127.0.0.1
>
> Look at all the pretty output...
>
Yeah, after I wrote that message, I tried to connect with a cipher
that SSH *does
On Mon 10 Jun 2002 13:23, Anne Carasik wrote:
> This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
As in, "This one time, at band camp..."? >;) Also, sorry about
the wretched linebreaks, folks. Good ol Outlook.
> Check the man page for what ciphers SSH2 accepts. I usually
> leave it on Blowfish because it's
Should have absolutely no problems connecting to sshd on Woody
or Sid from Windows using SecureCRT 3.4 or SecureFX 1.9 as I run 3.4.1
and 1.9.6 respectively from Windows 2000 with no problem on multiple
machines... I set the SSH Server to "Auto Detect" and left all Ciphers
and MAC options c
Quoting Thomas Thurman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I can see how [speed of line] and [whether to use compression] are
> related, and how [trustedness of line] and [whether to use encryption] are
> related. But I don't see how anyone could say that "If your data's going
> over a high-speed line, there's
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting Anne Carasik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
> > > 3) Any reason you *wouldn't* want to use compression in SSH?
> >
> > Yes, if you're going over a high speed line, no reason to use
> > compression. If you're co
Quoting Anne Carasik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
> > 3) Any reason you *wouldn't* want to use compression in SSH?
>
> Yes, if you're going over a high speed line, no reason to use
> compression. If you're connecting through a slow line (like a
> modem), use compression
Do netstat -anp as root instead, it gives process pid and name
-Original Message-
From: Ryan J Goss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 12:04:03 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: netstat output
> When I do a netstat -an, how do I properly decipher the output? To
> me it
> looks like a lot of po
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 19:13, Jeff Bonner wrote:
> Questions:
>
> 1) Are all those ciphers actually available in my SSH package?
Run the ssh daemon with debugging on (2 levels or more) and check the
output:
sshd -d -d -d -p
ssh -v -p 127.0.0.1
Look at all the pretty output...
debug2: kex_par
Hi Jeff,
This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
> I've been playing around with a Woody installation, connecting to it via
> SSH2, with SecureCRT 3.4 for Win32. I think I've finally figured out what
> encryption types this Debian package (ssh 3.0.2p1-9) supports, but please
> correct me if I'm wrong
I use: netstat -vat | grep LISTEN
That will tell you everything that is really listening on your server.
You should be able to use "lsof" to find out what is actually listening
on those ports.
- James
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan J Goss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, J
I've been playing around with a Woody installation, connecting to it via
SSH2,
with SecureCRT 3.4 for Win32. I think I've finally figured out what
encryption
types this Debian package (ssh 3.0.2p1-9) supports, but please correct
me if I'm
wrong -- http://www.openssh.org/features.html lists *only*
Ryan J Goss wrote:
When I do a netstat -an, how do I properly decipher the output? To me it
looks like a lot of ports are listening, is there a way to determine what
daemon is running on those ports?
netstat -anp will tell you which processes.
lsof -i : will tell you more specifically who (e.g
When I do a netstat -an, how do I properly decipher the output? To me it
looks like a lot of ports are listening, is there a way to determine what
daemon is running on those ports?
--Ryan Goss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems Staff
"Counting in octal is just like counting in decimal--if you don't use
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:03:11PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 12:51:00AM -0500, Jor-el wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> >
> > > Just a guess...
> > > but it probably has something to do with another package may
> > > be utilizing that ID
>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:21:05PM +0200, D.J. Bolderman wrote:
> Hello ppl,
>
> What are some important things to watch on your debian box ? I'm checking
> logfiles periodically, and run chkrootkit once in a while.
> Are there any parameters in debian that can be turned on for some more
> detaile
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 08:28:24PM +0200, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, I set up my server with aide and tiger to check it's integrity. The
> reports are mailed to root which one is redirected to an other localadress
> and to a second adresse on a other server. My question is now: is it
> pos
I think that you're a bit harsh, it is not necessary.
if anyone take a look at debian lists, one would see, that there are spanish,
french, and so on lists (even developers' lists as well).
every list has a netiquette/faq or anything. if the "official" language of
this list is not mentioned ther
Previously Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> Can anybody suggest a suitable forum/mailing list to ask for help on
> this?
The security-audit list comes to mind. Google can tell you where to
find it :)
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 04:57, Jean Christophe ANDRÃ wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> Probably a stupid question but... I can see lots of you on this list
> frequently signing their e-mails, do you use some kind of GPG agent?
afaik gpg-agent is only just developping. Search gpg-devel list for it.
btw,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 09:31:09AM +0200, VERBEEK, Francois wrote:
> I didn't intend to start an extensive discussion when replying to
> Aurelien's question. Anyway, I'd just like to say to close the
> debate that something that makes the web so strong is that anyone
> can express himself in it
I didn't intend to start an extensive discussion when replying to Aurelien's
question.
Anyway, I'd just like to say to close the debate that something that makes the
web so strong is that anyone can express himself in its own language. I
understand and strongly agree that distribution lists lik
27 matches
Mail list logo
