> On Tue 11 Jun 2002 19:54, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > There is a lot of collaboration between the respective security
> > teams for the major Linux distributions. As a result of this,
> > they all tend to release necessary security updates at the same
> > time. Known security updates are rarel
On Tue 11 Jun 2002 19:54, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > reminded me of a flap that arose over a list of
> > vulnerabilities posted by platform, etc on SecurityFocus:
> >
> >http://securityfocus.com/vulns/stats.shtml
>
> I'm not sure this data is worth much. Debian, Redhat, SuSE, et al
> typ
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 07:20:50PM -0400, Jeff Bonner wrote:
> I am certainly not in a position to say which is more secure, but this
> reminded me of a flap that arose over a list of vulnerabilities posted
> by platform, etc on SecurityFocus:
>
>http://securityfocus.com/vulns/stats.shtml
I'm
On Tue 11 Jun 2002 11:54, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I look for good comparison about the security of Debian and Redhat or
> SuSE systems, especial about number of found local exploits or DOS
> attacks. I assume that Debian Stable should be less invulnerable since
> the software is more tested, but I w
On 11 Jun 2002 14:31, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > There is already a response to this report, and the
> > maintainer (I think?) is asking for confirmation, because he
> > isn't seeing the same errors. I assume it's okay with
> > everyone involved, so I have put together a list of those of
> > us for
> "Jeff" == Jeff Bonner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> Christian Kurz was kind enough to file a bug report for me,
Jeff> at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=149436,
Jeff> which describes this problem.
Jeff> There is already a response to this report, and th
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Proud Debian-User wrote:
> Jun 11 19:01:14 abyss kernel: martian source 10.10.151.255 from
> 10.10.151.43, on dev eth0
> Jun 11 19:03:19 abyss kernel: martian source 10.10.150.1 from 10.10.151.43,
> on dev eth0
>
> in the last 5 days these logging messages increases.
> Normall
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Proud Debian-User wrote:
> Jun 11 19:01:14 abyss kernel: martian source 10.10.151.255 from
> 10.10.151.43, on dev eth0
> Jun 11 19:03:19 abyss kernel: martian source 10.10.150.1 from 10.10.151.43,
> on dev eth0
Looks like someone has a screwed up netmask to me.
--
"One dis
On Tue 11 Jun 2002 08:27, Jussi Ekholm wrote @ debian-security:
> > >June 4 19:36:26 firegate sshd[24364]: PAM pam_putenv:
> > >delete non-existent entry; MAIL
> >
> > I'm not sure exactly why it's carping like that, but take a
> > look at your /etc/pam.d/ssh . Removing the noenv option
Hi
Jun 11 19:01:14 abyss kernel: martian source 10.10.151.255 from
10.10.151.43, on dev eth0
Jun 11 19:03:19 abyss kernel: martian source 10.10.150.1 from 10.10.151.43,
on dev eth0
in the last 5 days these logging messages increases.
Normally i ignore them, but now there are 7 machines in my net
Hello people,
I look for good comparison about the security of Debian and Redhat or
SuSE systems, especial about number of found local exploits or DOS
attacks. I assume that Debian Stable should be less invulnerable since
the software is more tested, but I would need some argumentation help to
con
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jeff Bonner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020604 16:47]:
>>June 4 19:36:26 firegate sshd[24364]: PAM pam_putenv: delete
>>non-existent entry; MAIL
>
> I'm not sure exactly why it's carping like that, but take a look at your
> /etc/pam.d/ssh . Removing t
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:57:34AM +0200, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote:
>
> As a native dutch speaker I find it very easy to remember 'netstat
> -tulpen':
> -t: tcp
> -u: udp
> -l: show only listening sockets
> -p: show pid and program using the socket
> -e: display aditional information.
> -n: numeric
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:39, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:17:02PM -0400, James wrote:
> > I use: netstat -vat | grep LISTEN
> >
> > That will tell you everything that is really listening on your server.
> >
> Not really, IIRC it will not show you udp s
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:17:02PM -0400, James wrote:
> I use: netstat -vat | grep LISTEN
>
> That will tell you everything that is really listening on your server.
>
Not really, IIRC it will not show you udp servers.
You might want to check Tiger's test: check_listeningprocs
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.comThe most personalized portal on the Web!
16 matches
Mail list logo
