Proposal for new Security subsection for non-US

2002-06-21 Thread Matthew Grant
Dear All, It has come to my attention over the past 2 years that there are a number of deficiencies when dealing with the security software such as snort and Nessus in the current stable release. The list of problems are: o So out of date the exploit and signature databases are so out of date

Re: Updated Apache packages for testing?

2002-06-21 Thread Paul Haesler
Updated packages for testing/woody are up. I ran apt-get this morning and there they were. :) > I'm worried about the serious bug found in Apache reciently. > > Debian currently has only provided a patch for the stable version. > Anybody knows were I can get preliminar packages or something like

Updated Apache packages for testing?

2002-06-21 Thread Guille -bisho-
I'm worried about the serious bug found in Apache reciently. Debian currently has only provided a patch for the stable version. Anybody knows were I can get preliminar packages or something like that of apache 1.3.26? I have been trying to patch a source deb from the 1.3.24-3, but I have some pr

Re: sources.list for potato

2002-06-21 Thread vdongen
-Original Message- From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 16:05:10 +0200 Subject: Re: sources.list for potato > Previously Pavel Minev Penev wrote: > > And there is no > > > > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-security unstable/updates main > contrib non-

Re: sources.list for potato

2002-06-21 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Pavel Minev Penev wrote: > And there is no > > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-security unstable/updates main > contrib non-free > > , is it? No, and there never will be. Wichert. -- _ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sources.list for potato

2002-06-21 Thread Pavel Minev Penev
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:22:32AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hate to beat a dead horse, but > > > > > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian potato main contrib non-free > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/potato-proposed-updates/ >

Re: Upload speed of Apache 1.3.26?

2002-06-21 Thread Bernhard Reiter
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:57:41PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote: > On Don, 20 Jun 2002, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > > Given the importance of the problem I thought I'd ask > > how long it will approximately take until these packages will be > > available from the public ftp servers? > > Yesterday it was

Re: sources.list for potato

2002-06-21 Thread Jamie Heilman
Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > > For a truly stable Debian system, drop > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/potato-proposed-updates/ > > I wouldn't recommend that, on occasion a package makes it into > proposed-updates that really should not be install

Re: iptables question

2002-06-21 Thread Jean-Michel RAUX
Hi Prerouting is processed first, but you don't need to open port in INPUT. Packets must go through FORWARD table, so you may need something like: iptables -A FORWARD -i ppp0 -p tcp -d 192.168.1.2 --dport -j ACCEPT You can see a usefull "netfilter map" here : http://www.admin2k.com/Netfil

Re: iptables question

2002-06-21 Thread Jan Räther
On 22 Jun 2002 16:43:17 +0800 Crispin Wellington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 16:15, Jan Räther wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > i have just a simple question about iptables. I got a router running > > debian with iptables. The Standard Policy's for all chains are DROP. > > Now

Re: sources.list for potato

2002-06-21 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > For a truly stable Debian system, drop > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/potato-proposed-updates/ I wouldn't recommend that, on occasion a package makes it into proposed-updates that really should not be installed on a potato reason for some rea

Re: iptables question

2002-06-21 Thread Crispin Wellington
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 16:15, Jan Räther wrote: > Hi there, > > i have just a simple question about iptables. I got a router running > debian with iptables. The Standard Policy's for all chains are DROP. Now i > want to masq/route a few specific ports to some boxes inside my LAN, all > with 192.168

AW: DSA 131: Apache Vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Marcel Weber
Hi Good you mentioned it. All my boxes are behind firewalls. For the building from source, yes I know, it's a good idea to do this. The point is, I'm doing this on systems that are only maintained by myself, one system is even a linux box running a very own distribution, all built from source. But

iptables question

2002-06-21 Thread Jan Räther
Hi there, i have just a simple question about iptables. I got a router running debian with iptables. The Standard Policy's for all chains are DROP. Now i want to masq/route a few specific ports to some boxes inside my LAN, all with 192.168.1.x addresses. I do that with: iptables -A PREROUTING -t

Unidentified subject!

2002-06-21 Thread Patryk Dawidziuk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 unsubscribe Pozdrawiam :) [ Patryk Dawidziuk | @: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | administrator sieci ] [ ] [ pgp2.6.3i: http://biblio.bg.am.wroc.pl/~glut/pgp.glut.asc] [ gnu pgp