Hi,
Thanks for the comments.
Ah, I see your in-depth post on Bugtraq now (-;
http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/bugtraq0207/39/1.html
>From your Bugtraq post, I got the impression that since I haven't
changed the defaults in /etc/nsswitch.conf -- i.e. my networks: line
is:
networks: f
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Rafael wrote:
> As I said, I might hang around for some time
Please don't.
Please go back to whichever Red Hat list it was that threw you out for
spewing flame-bait all over them; with the attitude problem you
display, and ignorance of real-life conditions in the world of e-ma
Perhaps we should make a new list:
debian-rant-about-spam
Maybe then we could get rid of OT threads like this one...
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:28:27PM -0700, Rafael wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:28:35AM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>
> Realy?
>
>
>
pgpzsMcFOtXPh.pgp
Description: PG
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:28:35AM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:13:30PM -0700, Rafael wrote:
> >> Since I do not tolerate any level of spam
> >
> > If you do not tolerate any
LOJADOTELEMOVEL.com
--
A maior loja Portuguesa de acessórios e telemóveis
Qualidade e garantia de um bom serviço
--
Esta semana NÃO PERCA:
* * CAMPANHA DE VERÃO * *
Na compra de uma Bolsa 100% pele Ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
[SNIP]
> > reading message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7 of 16 (3715 octets)
> > ...procmail: Program failure (-11) of "/usr/bin/spamassassin"
> > procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded
> > fetchmail: MDA returned nonzero status 62720
> > not
Hi,
I've got more mails re this Spam mail than I've have
actual spam in the last month (I use filters, maybe
some of the complainers should ??). This mails had
nothing to do with the list and are also therefore
spam (in my book anyway).
As a previous mail said, spam happens, get used to it,
or
LOJADOTELEMOVEL.com
--
A maior loja Portuguesa de acessórios e telemóveis
Qualidade e garantia de um bom serviço
--
Esta semana NÃO PERCA:
* * CAMPANHA DE VERÃO * *
Na compra de uma Bolsa 100% pe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:13:30PM -0700, Rafael wrote:
>> Since I do not tolerate any level of spam
>
> If you do not tolerate any level of spam, you are not using e-mail.
> Sorry, but spam exists. I hate it
## Patrick Hsieh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2002_3.txt
> Is there anyone working around this problem?
If you want to have 2.4STABLE7 now on woody or sid, you can get
the source package for 2.4STABLE6 (apt-get source), patch with
the official squid patch
ht
http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2002_3.txt
Is there anyone working around this problem?
--
Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2002_3.txt
Is there anyone working around this problem?
__
Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2002:3
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I see a claim that glibc isn't vulnerable at:
>
> http://www.kb.cert.org/CERT_WEB/vul-notes.nsf/id/AAMN-5BMSW2
>
> Any comments?
GNU libc in its current version does contain incorrect code from BIND
4.9. It is vulnerable, though not in the way initially described by
15 matches
Mail list logo
