Previously Aurelio Turco wrote:
Furthermore:
http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US
does not appear to exist.
security.debian.org is hosted in a non-US location and doesn't have
a seperate non-US archive.
Wichert.
--
Then how are the packages so stored elsewhere differentiated?
Or are the packages under the debian-non-US directory distributed under the
other headings when grabbing from this particular server?
Previously Aurelio Turco wrote:
Furthermore:
http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US
Hello!
Anybody know of a tool like PGPDisk for Linux?
Cya Arnd
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:47:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Anybody know of a tool like PGPDisk for Linux?
Google for Linux encrypted loopback, should give results.
--
Lionel
pgpg8CvXAWNIt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[-snip-]
Speaking of KeyServers is there a .deb for one of 'em around somewere?
greets Uwe
--
X-Tec GmbH
Institute for Computer and Network Security
WWW : http://www.x-tec.de/
Found three articles on freshmeat.net
search for 'encrypted loopback'
- loopy
Utility for creation and mounting of encrypted loopback device
filesystems.
- Pam mount
SMB, NCP, or loopback-encrypted volume mounting upon login.
- secret stash
Provides automounting of an encrypted
* Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello!
Anybody know of a tool like PGPDisk for Linux?
cfs is in stable.
- Rolf
Hello,
Am 13:28 03/08/02 +0200 hat Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn geschrieben:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Michelle Konzack wrote:
there is a Debian-Package ssl-nfs (or secure-nfs) in the Mirror...
It is much more save the all other trics with your Networks.
And what mirror would that be? Any pointers?
Consors France, à
la pointe de l'innovation en matière
I'm using Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29) on a sid (debian unstable) box with a
2.4.16 kernel.
Over the past several months, I have been receiving email messages that
(probably) contain various forms of malware. In these messages, there
are two attachments: the first is the (DOS/Win) executable, and the
Hi,
Over the past several months, I have been receiving email messages that
(probably) contain various forms of malware. In these messages, there
are two attachments: the first is the (DOS/Win) executable, and the
second is a similarly named non-executable. Both attachments have the
Hi Sylvain,
I should have looked a little closer at _ALL_ of the headers. I missed
the alternative part. I just thought it was strange that an exe was
hidden from view. I was worried that openning the attachment might
open the wrong one, however, i rarely open attachments anyway.
Thanks,
I am new to this computer stuff and wondered if I could get some pointers
on it all.
Thanks,
Geoff
Also, look for bestcrypt. It's at www.jetico.com.
-Anne
This one time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Anybody know of a tool like PGPDisk for Linux?
Cya Arnd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Subscribe
Thanks,
Geoff
* Patrick Maheral ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020808 08:22]:
Is there a way tell Mutt to list all attachments? If so, why isn't this
the default behaviour?
Does view-attachments (bound by default to 'v') not work? It should
show all attachments, even to multipart/alternative messages. From that
Did the above mentioned hole ever get fixed in potato bitchx?
Seems that it should have been, but the exploit is well over a year old,
and I see nothing in the changelog.
Mike
Geoffery wrote:
I am new to this computer stuff and wondered if I could get some
pointers on it all.
I don't know if I should be laughing or crying.
-davidu
Which bug? this url does not work
-Roger
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:19:34 -0400 (EDT)
Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did the above mentioned hole ever get fixed in potato bitchx?
Seems that it should have been, but the exploit is well over a year old,
and I see nothing in the
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Roger Ward wrote:
Which bug? this url does not work
oops.
http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5QP020K35O.html
It's the DNS parsing code bug.
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 21:29, David U. wrote:
Geoffery wrote:
I am new to this computer stuff and wondered if I could get some
pointers on it all.
I don't know if I should be laughing or crying.
Let's laugh...
;)
-davidu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
I've got a problem with logcheck that I wondered if anyone
else has been seeing.
Just after the logrotation in the early morning, I get one
screwed up logcheck report back from each machine. The report
contains fragments of months old data.
For the other 23 hours of the day, all log reports are
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Roger Ward wrote:
Which bug? this url does not work
Seems he typed the URL manually or something, the last character is an O
and not 0, I found the correct article:
http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5QP020K35O.html
// Thomas
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:47:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Anybody know of a tool like PGPDisk for Linux?
Cya Arnd
I just build my kernels with the linux crypto patches and
then mount loopback files.
I also use it for crypto swap.
http://www.kerneli.org/cryptoapi/
I've got a problem with logcheck that I wondered if anyone
else has been seeing.
Just after the logrotation in the early morning, I get one
screwed up logcheck report back from each machine. The report
contains fragments of months old data.
For the other 23 hours of the day, all log
http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/286087/2002-07-30/2002-08-05/0
I haven't seen anything about this from Debian. They site GNU libc
2.2.5 as being vulnerbale, and that is the version of libc6 on my
system.
The last vulnerability fix I see in the changelog is the resolver one.
David Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've got a problem with logcheck that I wondered if anyone
else has been seeing.
Just after the logrotation in the early morning, I get one
screwed up logcheck report back from each machine. The report
contains fragments of months old data.
Now now :P *chuckle*
Geoff,
This is not a window$-based mailing list, but one for Debian
GNU/Linux. I would suggest search some of the online forums or usergroups
for futher window$ information.
Regards,
William
At 09:47 PM 8/08/02 +0200, Laurent Luyckx wrote:
On Thu, 2002-08-08
Dale == Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dale I've got a problem with logcheck that I wondered if anyone else
Dale has been seeing.
Dale Just after the logrotation in the early morning, I get one screwed
Dale up logcheck report back from each machine. The report contains
Dale fragments of
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:39:36AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
I've seen it only once, a few days ago, but that was after I changed
the /etc/logcheck/logcheck.logfiles. There were also a bunch of
warnings from logcheck that it could not create files in
/var/lib/logcheck/. Have not seen it
31 matches
Mail list logo
