[SECURITY] [DSA 158-1] New gaim packages fix arbitrary program execution

2002-08-27 Thread Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -- Debian Security Advisory DSA 158-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze August 27th, 2002

Re: static sshd

2002-08-27 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For one, I've never seen the requirement for /var/empty pop up before, which makes me think debian has things built differently than I. apt-get source ssh and look into debian/rules to see what the Maintainer does?! -- begin OjE-ist-scheisse.txt bye,

Re: static sshd (off topic re nuking bin laden)

2002-08-27 Thread Peter Cordes
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:00:35AM +0100, Dale Amon wrote: Nuke bin Laden: Dale Amon, CEO/MD improve the global Islandone Society gene pool. www.islandone.org Nuclear explosions generate radioactive fallout (or make the cave they were set off in

Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Daniel J. Rychlik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is great, Just great. I run a mail server on dsl service provided by mabell. I wrote a perl script that mails me some reports on activities on my server everyday. I wake up this morning and I have an alarm. Obviously, non of these were

Re: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Karl Breitner
Daniel J. Rychlik wrote: This is great, Just great. I run a mail server on dsl service provided by mabell. I wrote a perl script that mails me some reports on activities on my server everyday. I wake up this morning and I have an alarm. Obviously, non of these were relayed from my server

Re: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi Karl. Karl Breitner wrote: What can I say Daniel, except welcome to the harsh reality of a postmaster. Hmm, as I'm to become a postmaster in a few days, too, I would like to learn a bit more about that. Most probably this list is not intended for chat like this, so I would be happy to

Re: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Mika Boström
Karl Breitner wrote: Welcome to the world of SPAMfighting Our new server has an official IP since last saturday, and no domain name pointing to it yet besides a dyndns-account I abused for testing purpose. Within these three days of operation I had several persons trying to get access to

Re: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Dale Amon
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:11:21PM +0300, Mika Bostr?m wrote: Karl Breitner wrote: Welcome to the world of SPAMfighting Our new server has an official IP since last saturday, and no domain name pointing to it yet besides a dyndns-account I abused for testing purpose. Within these three

Re: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:12:51AM -0500, Daniel J. Rychlik wrote: This is great, Just great. I run a mail server on dsl service provided by mabell. I wrote a perl script that mails me some reports on activities on my server everyday. I wake up this morning and I have an alarm. Obviously,

Re: static sshd

2002-08-27 Thread Dale Amon
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:27:46AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: apt-get source ssh and look into debian/rules to see what the Maintainer does?! Yes, someone else suggested that. Which was rather easy since those were the base sources I was working with anyway. It at least showed that the option

unsubscribe

2002-08-27 Thread malar

Re: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 at 11:32:53PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: PS: actually, the only other thing you could do is set firewall rules blocking inbound tcp port 25. if your mail server is the primary MX for your domain then you would also need a secondary MX and open the firewall for just that

Re: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020827 17:07]: On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:12:51AM -0500, Daniel J. Rychlik wrote: PS: actually, the only other thing you could do is set firewall rules blocking inbound tcp port 25. if your mail server is the primary MX for your domain then you would also

Re: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Rolf Kutz
* Quoting Craig Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): PS: actually, the only other thing you could do is set firewall rules blocking inbound tcp port 25. if your mail server is the primary MX for your domain then you would also need a secondary MX and open the firewall for just that machine.

Re: static sshd

2002-08-27 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Dale Amon wrote: I'm building a static sshd and am having a bit of hassle figuring out which configure options are needed for debian compatibility. , | Since glibc does not support 'int optreset;' functionality | implemented in most BSDes. We have to include our own.

Re: static sshd

2002-08-27 Thread Dale Amon
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:34:44PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Dale Amon wrote: I'm building a static sshd and am having a bit of hassle figuring out which configure options are needed for debian compatibility. , | Since glibc does not support 'int

RE: Mail relay attempts

2002-08-27 Thread Jones, Steven
Ive found port sentry really good for detecting port scans and then routeing the return packets to no where. :) Thing -Original Message- From: Rolf Kutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2002 4:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian. Org Subject: Re: Mail relay attempts *

cryptoloop confusion

2002-08-27 Thread Jeff
I've decided to learn how to setup an encrypted filesystem using the cryptoloop method and I'm having troubles getting my kernal source patched correctly. I've read the Loopback Encrypted Filesystem HOWTO, but it's outdated. Here are a number of patches for kernel 2.4.18 and I'm confused as to

Re: cryptoloop confusion

2002-08-27 Thread Pedro Diaz Jimenez
Hi, [Probably not related much to your problems, but you might find it interesting] If all you want is file system encryption you can try the loop-AES patche http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/ If used it for a long time on my laptop and it's been perfectly usable (stable, fast to some excent,

Re: cryptoloop confusion [repost]

2002-08-27 Thread Pedro Diaz Jimenez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 holy cow, what was I thinking when I wrote this? I hope the original post was understandable, but here is the corrected version Sorry for the repost folks Cheers Pedro On Wednesday 28 August 2002 00:44, Pedro Diaz Jimenez wrote: Hi, [Probably

Re: Bug#149714: libfam0 Does not depend on fam

2002-08-27 Thread James M. Cape
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 19:30, Cedric Ware wrote: [...] change in the description to warn about libfam0 being useless w/o a fam daemon somewhere would be a welcome addition :-). I would heartfully deinstall libfam0 if KDE did not depend on it. :-) Now, I realize that there is a problem